Paper · 2008 · Anhui nongye kexue

Study on the Effects of Boron with Different Concentrations on Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Insect-resistant Cotton

Xuebin Zhang

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The purpose was to study the biological and biochemical influence of spraying boron on insect-resistant cotton.[Method] The boric acid with concentrations of 0,0.1% and 0.3% was sprayed on Yumian1 and insect-resistant cotton and the leaves,calyces,petals and pistils were taken to determine their boron,protein and soluble sugar contents.[Result] The available boron content of soil in experimental field was 0.17 mg/kg,belonging to the soil lack of boron.Spraying boric acid increased boron contents in each part of cotton obviously and their change degrees were pistils leaves petals.After spraying boron,the protein content increased significantly in leaves and increased slightly in petals,and that in pistils had bigger difference between 2 varieties and had no obvious regularity.The soluble sugar content decreased slightly in leaves,increased significantly in petals,decreased little in pistils of insect-resistant cotton and had no obvious change in pistils of Yumian1.[Conclusion] The boron contents increased significantly and the content changes of protein and soluble sugar were different in each part of cotton after spraying boron.Considering comprehensively,spraying boron with the concentration of 0.1% on insect-resistant cotton was more suitable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Experimental soil had low available boron at 0.17 mg/kg.

Outcome
available boron content of soile0
Value
0.17 mg/kge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The available boron content of soil in experimental field was 0.17 mg/kg,belonging to the soil lack of boron.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid spraying increased boron content in cotton organs.

Treatment
Spraying boric acide0
Outcome
boron contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying boric acid increased boron contents in each part of cotton obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After boron spraying, protein content increased significantly in leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
spraying borone0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After spraying boron,the protein content increased significantly in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After boron spraying, protein content increased slightly in petals.

Organ / stage
petalse0
Treatment
spraying borone1
Outcome
protein contente1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased slightly in petals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“After spraying boron,the protein content increased significantly in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content in pistils differed between the two varieties without a regular pattern after boron spraying.

Organ / stage
pistilse0
Outcome
protein contente1
Qualifier
no obvious regularitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“that in pistils had bigger difference between 2 varieties and had no obvious regularity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–797 · show in text ↑
e1

“the protein content increased significantly in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugar content decreased slightly in leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
spraying borone1
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble sugar content decreased slightly in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–852 · show in text ↑
e1

“After spraying boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugar content increased significantly in petals.

Organ / stage
petalse0
Treatment
spraying borone2
Outcome
soluble sugar contente1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased significantly in petals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“The soluble sugar content decreased slightly in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–852 · show in text ↑
e2

“After spraying boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugar content decreased slightly in insect-resistant cotton pistils.

Taxon
insect-resistant cottone0
Organ / stage
pistilse0
Treatment
spraying borone2
Outcome
soluble sugar contente1
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decreased little in pistils of insect-resistant cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“The soluble sugar content decreased slightly in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–852 · show in text ↑
e2

“After spraying boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugar content in Yumian1 pistils showed no obvious change.

Material
Yumian1e0
Organ / stage
pistilse0
Treatment
spraying borone2
Outcome
soluble sugar contente1
Direction
no obvious changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had no obvious change in pistils of Yumian1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–989 · show in text ↑
e1

“The soluble sugar content decreased slightly in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–852 · show in text ↑
e2

“After spraying boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered 0.1% boron spraying most suitable for insect-resistant cotton.

Taxon
insect-resistant cottone0
Treatment
spraying boron with the concentration of 0.1%e0
Outcome
more suitablee0

Verbatim

e0

“spraying boron with the concentration of 0.1% on insect-resistant cotton was more suitable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1276 · show in text ↑

boron atom · physiology: osmolytes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

boric acid · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

boron atom · quality: protein · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · quality: protein · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 43 positive, 7 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

application · physiology: osmolytes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.