Paper · 2000 · Xi'nan Nongye Daxue xuebao

THE EFFECT OF NOVEL CHEMICAL GAMETOCIDE NO.1 ON THE CONTENT OF CHOROPHYLL IN COTTON

Chen Shi-hong

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of chemical gametocide NO.1 on the content of chorophyll in cotton leaves was studied. The results showed that the content of chorophyll (chorophyll a, chorophyll b and total chorophyll) was decreased firstly and then increased after the first spraying chemical gametocide, the content of chorophyll was decreased monotonously after the second spraying chemical gametocide. Chorophyll a , chorophyll b and total chorophyll were decreased by 19%, 25% and 18% after14d, respectively. Adding metal ion (Mn 2+ ) to chemical gametocide, the similar result was obtained. PPJ and Mn 2+ could effectively increase the content of chorophyll in cotton leaves. The effects of treatment time and the content of PPJ on the content of chorophyll in cotton leaves were studied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the first gametocide spray, cotton chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll initially decreased and then increased.

Treatment
first spraying chemical gametocidee0
Outcome
chorophyll a, chorophyll b and total chorophylle0
Direction
decreased firstly and then increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of chorophyll (chorophyll a, chorophyll b and total chorophyll) was decreased firstly and then increased after the first spraying chemical gametocide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“the content of chorophyll in cotton leaves was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the second spray, cotton chlorophyll content decreased monotonically.

Treatment
second spraying chemical gametocidee0
Outcome
content of chorophylle0
Direction
decreased monotonouslye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of chorophyll was decreased monotonously after the second spraying chemical gametocide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–383 · show in text ↑
e1

“the content of chorophyll in cotton leaves was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chorophyll a declined by 19% after 14 days.

Outcome
Chorophyll ae0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
19%e0
Qualifier
after14de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chorophyll a , chorophyll b and total chorophyll were decreased by 19%, 25% and 18% after14d, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–491 · show in text ↑
e1

“the content of chorophyll in cotton leaves was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

chorophyll b declined by 25% after 14 days.

Outcome
chorophyll be0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
25%e0
Qualifier
after14de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chorophyll a , chorophyll b and total chorophyll were decreased by 19%, 25% and 18% after14d, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–491 · show in text ↑
e1

“the content of chorophyll in cotton leaves was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

total chorophyll declined by 18% after 14 days.

Outcome
total chorophylle0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
18%e0
Qualifier
after14de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chorophyll a , chorophyll b and total chorophyll were decreased by 19%, 25% and 18% after14d, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–491 · show in text ↑
e1

“the content of chorophyll in cotton leaves was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Mn2+ to the gametocide gave a similar chlorophyll response.

Treatment
Adding metal ion (Mn 2+ ) to chemical gametocidee0
Outcome
similar resulte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding metal ion (Mn 2+ ) to chemical gametocide, the similar result was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–574 · show in text ↑
e1

“the content of chorophyll in cotton leaves was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPJ increased cotton leaf chorophyll content.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
PPJe0
Outcome
content of chorophylle0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PPJ and Mn 2+ could effectively increase the content of chorophyll in cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mn 2+ increased cotton leaf chorophyll content.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Mn 2+e0
Outcome
content of chorophylle0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PPJ and Mn 2+ could effectively increase the content of chorophyll in cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–659 · show in text ↑

application · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 21 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.