Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer

Effect of water and P fertilizer coupling on corn yield,P uptake,and P utilization efficiency with drip irrigation in a calcareous soil

Zhang Guo-qia

18
claims
44
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objectives 】In drip irrigation agriculture system, according to phosphorus nutrition demand characteristic of maize in different growth stage,water coupling with P fertilizer application is an effective way of improving P resources efficiency as well as decreasing soil P fixation in calcareous soil. However,more information is needed about how to improve P utilization efficiency in drip irrigated fields. The objective of this field study was to compare the effect of different P fertilizers on drip-irrigated corn yield and P utilization. 【Methods】The experiment included four treatments:( i) no P fertilizer( CK),( ii) P2O581 kg /ha of solid diammonium phosphate( DAP) fertilizer basal applied at planting and 54 kg topdressed( T1),( iii) P2O581 kg /ha of liquid phosphoric acid( PA) fertilizer applied at planting and 54 kg topdressied( T2),( iv) P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3).【Results】The yield was 20622 kg/ha in the T3 treatment,37% higher than in the CK,25%higher than in the T1,and 10% higher than in the T2 treatment. The total biomass,grain number per panicle and grain weight per 1000 grains were also the highest in the T3treatment( P 0. 05). At tasseling stage,14. 0 kg /haof P was absorbed in the CK treatment,22. 7 kg in the T1 treatment,21. 0 kg in the T2 treatment and 18. 3 kg in the T3 treatment. At maturity,total P absorption was 68. 4 kg /ha,77. 8 kg /ha,. 87. 2 kg /ha and 91. 9 kg /ha for CK,T1,T2,and T3,respectively. The amount of P absorption in the T3 treatment was significantly higher than in the other treatments( P 0. 05),indicating that topdressing of P significantly improved the P nutrition of corn. The apparent recovery efficiency of the P fertilizer( REP) was 16. 6% in the T1 treatment,32. 6% in the T2 treatment and 40. 6% in the T3 treatment. The T3 treatment increased REP by 8- 24 percentage points compared with the T1 and T2treatments. The agronomic efficiency of the P fertilizer( AEP) for T1,T2 and T3 was 7. 9,22. 7 and 40. 6kg /kg respectively. The T3 treatment increased AEP by 17. 9- 32. 7 kg /kg compared with the T1 and T2treatments.【Results】Liquid P fertilizer topdressing with drip irrigation significantly improves the P nutrition and P fertilizer utilization efficiency of corn,can be regarded as an efficient P fertilizer application strategy in calcareous soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield in the T3 treatment was 37% higher than in the CK.

Treatment
P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)e2
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
37%e1
Qualifier
20622 kg/hae1
Comparator
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The yield was 20622 kg/ha in the T3 treatment,37% higher than in the CK,25%higher than in the T1,and 10% higher than in the T2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1043 · show in text ↑
e2

“P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield in the T3 treatment was 25% higher than in the T1 treatment.

Treatment
P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)e2
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
25%e1
Comparator
T1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The yield was 20622 kg/ha in the T3 treatment,37% higher than in the CK,25%higher than in the T1,and 10% higher than in the T2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1043 · show in text ↑
e2

“P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield in the T3 treatment was 10% higher than in the T2 treatment.

Treatment
P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)e2
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
10%e1
Comparator
T2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The yield was 20622 kg/ha in the T3 treatment,37% higher than in the CK,25%higher than in the T1,and 10% higher than in the T2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1043 · show in text ↑
e2

“P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T3 treatment gave the highest total biomass, grain number per panicle and grain weight per 1000 grains.

Treatment
P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)e2
Outcome
total biomass,grain number per panicle and grain weight per 1000 grainse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The total biomass,grain number per panicle and grain weight per 1000 grains were also the highest in the T3treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1161 · show in text ↑
e2

“P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P absorption at tasseling stage was 18.3 kg/ha in the T3 treatment, higher than 14.0 kg/ha in the CK.

Organ / stage
tasseling stagee1
Treatment
P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)e2
Outcome
P was absorbede1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
18. 3 kge1
Comparator
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“At tasseling stage,14. 0 kg /haof P was absorbed in the CK treatment,22. 7 kg in the T1 treatment,21. 0 kg in the T2 treatment and 18. 3 kg in the T3 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1332 · show in text ↑
e2

“P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P absorption in the T3 treatment at maturity was significantly higher than in the other treatments.

Organ / stage
maturitye2
Treatment
P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)e3
Outcome
total P absorptione2
Direction
highere1
Value
91. 9 kg /hae2
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The amount of P absorption in the T3 treatment was significantly higher than in the other treatments( P 0. 05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1571 · show in text ↑
e2

“At maturity,total P absorption was 68. 4 kg /ha,77. 8 kg /ha,. 87. 2 kg /ha and 91. 9 kg /ha for CK,T1,T2,and T3,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1459 · show in text ↑
e3

“P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–897 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total P absorption at maturity was 68.4 kg/ha in the CK.

Organ / stage
maturitye1
Outcome
total P absorptione1
Value
68. 4 kg /hae1
Qualifier
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“At maturity,total P absorption was 68. 4 kg /ha,77. 8 kg /ha,. 87. 2 kg /ha and 91. 9 kg /ha for CK,T1,T2,and T3,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total P absorption at maturity was 77.8 kg/ha in the T1 treatment.

Organ / stage
maturitye1
Outcome
total P absorptione1
Value
77. 8 kg /hae1
Qualifier
T1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“At maturity,total P absorption was 68. 4 kg /ha,77. 8 kg /ha,. 87. 2 kg /ha and 91. 9 kg /ha for CK,T1,T2,and T3,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total P absorption at maturity was 87.2 kg/ha in the T2 treatment.

Organ / stage
maturitye1
Outcome
total P absorptione1
Value
87. 2 kg /hae1
Qualifier
T2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“At maturity,total P absorption was 68. 4 kg /ha,77. 8 kg /ha,. 87. 2 kg /ha and 91. 9 kg /ha for CK,T1,T2,and T3,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The apparent recovery efficiency of the P fertilizer was 16.6% in the T1 treatment.

Outcome
apparent recovery efficiency of the P fertilizere1
Value
16. 6%e1
Qualifier
T1 treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The apparent recovery efficiency of the P fertilizer( REP) was 16. 6% in the T1 treatment,32. 6% in the T2 treatment and 40. 6% in the T3 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1653–1800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The apparent recovery efficiency of the P fertilizer was 32.6% in the T2 treatment.

Outcome
apparent recovery efficiency of the P fertilizere1
Value
32. 6%e1
Qualifier
T2 treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The apparent recovery efficiency of the P fertilizer( REP) was 16. 6% in the T1 treatment,32. 6% in the T2 treatment and 40. 6% in the T3 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1653–1800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The apparent recovery efficiency of the P fertilizer was 40.6% in the T3 treatment.

Outcome
apparent recovery efficiency of the P fertilizere1
Value
40. 6%e1
Qualifier
T3 treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The apparent recovery efficiency of the P fertilizer( REP) was 16. 6% in the T1 treatment,32. 6% in the T2 treatment and 40. 6% in the T3 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1653–1800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T3 treatment increased REP by 8-24 percentage points compared with the T1 and T2 treatments.

Treatment
P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)e2
Outcome
REPe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8- 24 percentage pointse1
Comparator
T1 and T2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The T3 treatment increased REP by 8- 24 percentage points compared with the T1 and T2treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1897 · show in text ↑
e2

“P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–897 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The agronomic efficiency of the P fertilizer was 7.9 kg/kg in the T1 treatment.

Outcome
agronomic efficiency of the P fertilizere1
Value
7. 9e1
Qualifier
T1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The agronomic efficiency of the P fertilizer( AEP) for T1,T2 and T3 was 7. 9,22. 7 and 40. 6kg /kg respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–2010 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The agronomic efficiency of the P fertilizer was 22.7 kg/kg in the T2 treatment.

Outcome
agronomic efficiency of the P fertilizere1
Value
22. 7e1
Qualifier
T2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The agronomic efficiency of the P fertilizer( AEP) for T1,T2 and T3 was 7. 9,22. 7 and 40. 6kg /kg respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–2010 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The agronomic efficiency of the P fertilizer was 40.6 kg/kg in the T3 treatment.

Outcome
agronomic efficiency of the P fertilizere1
Value
40. 6kg /kge1
Qualifier
T3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The agronomic efficiency of the P fertilizer( AEP) for T1,T2 and T3 was 7. 9,22. 7 and 40. 6kg /kg respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–2010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T3 treatment increased AEP by 17.9-32.7 kg/kg compared with the T1 and T2 treatments.

Treatment
P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)e2
Outcome
AEPe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
17. 9- 32. 7 kg /kge1
Comparator
T1 and T2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The T3 treatment increased AEP by 17. 9- 32. 7 kg /kg compared with the T1 and T2treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2012–2103 · show in text ↑
e2

“P2O5135 kg /ha of liquid PA topdressed( T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–897 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid P fertilizer topdressing with drip irrigation can be regarded as an efficient P fertilizer application strategy in calcareous soil.

Treatment
Liquid P fertilizer topdressing with drip irrigatione1
Outcome
P nutrition and P fertilizer utilization efficiencye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Liquid P fertilizer topdressing with drip irrigation significantly improves the P nutrition and P fertilizer utilization efficiency of corn,can be regarded as an efficient P fertilizer application strategy in calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2113–2337 · show in text ↑

phosphoric acid · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.