Paper · 2011 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effects of Fertilization on Quality Characters of Continuous Cropping Sweet Sorghum Stem

Luo Feng

3
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The effects of fertilizer on quality characters of continuous cropping sweet sorghum stem were studied to overcome continuous cropping obstacle.[Method] The sweet sorghum varieties Sweet 2 was used to study the effects of fertilization on brix and crude protein content of continuous cropping sweet sorghum stem.[Result] Continuous cropping obstacle could reduce forage quality of sweet sorghum.When preceding crop was sweet sorghum,employing continuous cropping fertilizer 600 kg/hm2 adding nitrogen fertilizer 450 kg/hm2,phosphate fertilizer 450 kg/hm2 and potassium fertilizer 150 kg/hm2,brix and the crude protein content of sweet sorghum were the highest.When preceding crop wasn't sweet sorghum,employing phosphate fertilizer 450 kg/hm2 and continuous cropping fertilizer 600 kg/hm2,brix and the crude protein content of sweet sorghum were the highest.[Conclusion] The research could provide essential scientific evidence for overcoming continuous cropping obstacle of sweet sorghum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous cropping could reduce the forage quality of sweet sorghum.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Material
Sweet 2e0
Organ / stage
stemt0
Treatment
Continuous croppinge1
Outcome
forage qualitye1
Direction
reducee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum Stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sweet sorghum varieties Sweet 2 was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–209 · show in text ↑
e1

“Continuous cropping obstacle could reduce forage quality of sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When sweet sorghum was the preceding crop, the fertilizer mix of 600 kg/hm2 continuous-cropping fertilizer with N 450, P 450 and K 150 kg/hm2 gave the highest brix and crude protein content.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Material
Sweet 2e0
Organ / stage
stemt0
Treatment
continuous cropping fertilizer 600 kg/hm2 adding nitrogen fertilizer 450 kg/hm2,phosphate fertilizer 450 kg/hm2 and potassium fertilizer 150 kg/hm2e2
Outcome
brix and the crude protein contente2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
When preceding crop was sweet sorghume2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum Stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sweet sorghum varieties Sweet 2 was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“When preceding crop was sweet sorghum,employing continuous cropping fertilizer 600 kg/hm2 adding nitrogen fertilizer 450 kg/hm2,phosphate fertilizer 450 kg/hm2 and potassium fertilizer 150 kg/hm2,brix and the crude protein content of sweet sorghum were the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When the preceding crop was not sweet sorghum, phosphate fertilizer 450 kg/hm2 with continuous-cropping fertilizer 600 kg/hm2 gave the highest brix and crude protein content.

Taxon
sweet sorghumt0
Material
Sweet 2e0
Organ / stage
stemt0
Treatment
phosphate fertilizer 450 kg/hm2 and continuous cropping fertilizer 600 kg/hm2e3
Outcome
brix and the crude protein contente3
Direction
higheste3
Qualifier
When preceding crop wasn't sweet sorghume3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum Stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sweet sorghum varieties Sweet 2 was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–209 · show in text ↑
e3

“When preceding crop wasn't sweet sorghum,employing phosphate fertilizer 450 kg/hm2 and continuous cropping fertilizer 600 kg/hm2,brix and the crude protein content of sweet sorghum were the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–869 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · SorghumResults differ

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

rotation · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

potassium · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

53 papers: 47 positive, 6 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

rotation · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.