Paper · 2005 · Soils and fertilizers

Effects of biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer on yield , quality of tomato and soil

Xiao-Ling Han; Naiwen Zhang

12
claims
37
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper described the influence of different fertilizers on tomato planted in protected soil . The results showed that biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer expressed quite important effects on yield, quality of tomato and soil nutrient. Compared with the NPK chemical compound fertilizer and control, the yield, soluble sugar content, organic acid content, and VC content in tomato were increased 7.34%~13.64%, 18.2%~23.2%, 8.3%~15.6%, 13.2%~15.1% respectively , while the nitrate content of tomato were reduced 22.9%~23.8%. The content of organic matter, alkaline N, available P, available K in tested soil were increased by 8.25%~10.48%, 9.43%~14.71%, 11.29%~15.00%, 13.60%~18.34% respectively; the number of bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi were increased by 45.45%~60.00%, 14.29%~33.33%, 44.19%~100.00%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer increased tomato yield compared with NPK fertilizer and control.

Treatment
biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
7.34%~13.64%e1
Comparator
NPK chemical compound fertilizer and controle1
Setting
protected soile5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer expressed quite important effects on yield, quality of tomato and soil nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–250 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the NPK chemical compound fertilizer and control, the yield, soluble sugar content, organic acid content, and VC content in tomato were increased 7.34%~13.64%, 18.2%~23.2%, 8.3%~15.6%, 13.2%~15.1% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–475 · show in text ↑
e5

“This paper described the influence of different fertilizers on tomato planted in protected soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer increased tomato soluble sugar content compared with NPK fertilizer and control.

Treatment
biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizere0
Outcome
soluble sugar contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
18.2%~23.2%e1
Comparator
NPK chemical compound fertilizer and controle1
Setting
protected soile5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer expressed quite important effects on yield, quality of tomato and soil nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–250 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the NPK chemical compound fertilizer and control, the yield, soluble sugar content, organic acid content, and VC content in tomato were increased 7.34%~13.64%, 18.2%~23.2%, 8.3%~15.6%, 13.2%~15.1% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–475 · show in text ↑
e5

“This paper described the influence of different fertilizers on tomato planted in protected soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer increased tomato organic acid content compared with NPK fertilizer and control.

Treatment
biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizere0
Outcome
organic acid contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8.3%~15.6%e1
Comparator
NPK chemical compound fertilizer and controle1
Setting
protected soile5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer expressed quite important effects on yield, quality of tomato and soil nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–250 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the NPK chemical compound fertilizer and control, the yield, soluble sugar content, organic acid content, and VC content in tomato were increased 7.34%~13.64%, 18.2%~23.2%, 8.3%~15.6%, 13.2%~15.1% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–475 · show in text ↑
e5

“This paper described the influence of different fertilizers on tomato planted in protected soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer increased tomato VC content compared with NPK fertilizer and control.

Treatment
biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizere0
Outcome
VC contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
13.2%~15.1%e1
Comparator
NPK chemical compound fertilizer and controle1
Setting
protected soile5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer expressed quite important effects on yield, quality of tomato and soil nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–250 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the NPK chemical compound fertilizer and control, the yield, soluble sugar content, organic acid content, and VC content in tomato were increased 7.34%~13.64%, 18.2%~23.2%, 8.3%~15.6%, 13.2%~15.1% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–475 · show in text ↑
e5

“This paper described the influence of different fertilizers on tomato planted in protected soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer reduced tomato nitrate content compared with NPK fertilizer and control.

Treatment
biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizere0
Outcome
nitrate contente2
Direction
reducede2
Value
22.9%~23.8%e2
Comparator
NPK chemical compound fertilizer and controle1
Setting
protected soile5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer expressed quite important effects on yield, quality of tomato and soil nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–250 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the NPK chemical compound fertilizer and control, the yield, soluble sugar content, organic acid content, and VC content in tomato were increased 7.34%~13.64%, 18.2%~23.2%, 8.3%~15.6%, 13.2%~15.1% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–475 · show in text ↑
e2

“while the nitrate content of tomato were reduced 22.9%~23.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–538 · show in text ↑
e5

“This paper described the influence of different fertilizers on tomato planted in protected soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer increased the content of organic matter in tested soil.

Treatment
biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizere0
Outcome
content of organic mattere3
Direction
increasede3
Value
8.25%~10.48%e3
Setting
protected soile5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer expressed quite important effects on yield, quality of tomato and soil nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–250 · show in text ↑
e3

“The content of organic matter, alkaline N, available P, available K in tested soil were increased by 8.25%~10.48%, 9.43%~14.71%, 11.29%~15.00%, 13.60%~18.34% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–710 · show in text ↑
e5

“This paper described the influence of different fertilizers on tomato planted in protected soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer increased alkaline N in tested soil.

Treatment
biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizere0
Outcome
alkaline Ne3
Direction
increasede3
Value
9.43%~14.71%e3
Setting
protected soile5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer expressed quite important effects on yield, quality of tomato and soil nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–250 · show in text ↑
e3

“The content of organic matter, alkaline N, available P, available K in tested soil were increased by 8.25%~10.48%, 9.43%~14.71%, 11.29%~15.00%, 13.60%~18.34% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–710 · show in text ↑
e5

“This paper described the influence of different fertilizers on tomato planted in protected soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer increased available P in tested soil.

Treatment
biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizere0
Outcome
available Pe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
11.29%~15.00%e3
Setting
protected soile5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer expressed quite important effects on yield, quality of tomato and soil nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–250 · show in text ↑
e3

“The content of organic matter, alkaline N, available P, available K in tested soil were increased by 8.25%~10.48%, 9.43%~14.71%, 11.29%~15.00%, 13.60%~18.34% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–710 · show in text ↑
e5

“This paper described the influence of different fertilizers on tomato planted in protected soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer increased available K in tested soil.

Treatment
biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizere0
Outcome
available Ke3
Direction
increasede3
Value
13.60%~18.34%e3
Setting
protected soile5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer expressed quite important effects on yield, quality of tomato and soil nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–250 · show in text ↑
e3

“The content of organic matter, alkaline N, available P, available K in tested soil were increased by 8.25%~10.48%, 9.43%~14.71%, 11.29%~15.00%, 13.60%~18.34% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–710 · show in text ↑
e5

“This paper described the influence of different fertilizers on tomato planted in protected soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer increased the number of soil bacteria.

Treatment
biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizere0
Outcome
number of bacteriae4
Direction
increasede4
Value
45.45%~60.00%e4
Setting
protected soile5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer expressed quite important effects on yield, quality of tomato and soil nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–250 · show in text ↑
e4

“the number of bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi were increased by 45.45%~60.00%, 14.29%~33.33%, 44.19%~100.00%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–823 · show in text ↑
e5

“This paper described the influence of different fertilizers on tomato planted in protected soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer increased the number of soil actinomycetes.

Treatment
biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizere0
Outcome
actinomycetese4
Direction
increasede4
Value
14.29%~33.33%e4
Setting
protected soile5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer expressed quite important effects on yield, quality of tomato and soil nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–250 · show in text ↑
e4

“the number of bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi were increased by 45.45%~60.00%, 14.29%~33.33%, 44.19%~100.00%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–823 · show in text ↑
e5

“This paper described the influence of different fertilizers on tomato planted in protected soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer increased the number of soil fungi.

Treatment
biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizere0
Outcome
fungie4
Direction
increasede4
Value
44.19%~100.00%e4
Setting
protected soile5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer expressed quite important effects on yield, quality of tomato and soil nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–250 · show in text ↑
e4

“the number of bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi were increased by 45.45%~60.00%, 14.29%~33.33%, 44.19%~100.00%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–823 · show in text ↑
e5

“This paper described the influence of different fertilizers on tomato planted in protected soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 48 positive, 1 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 226 positive, 45 negative or no effect

225 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.