Abstract
In order to explore the effects of pruning ways on the growth,yield and quality of melon(Cucumis melo L.var.makuwa Makino),the flowering period,fruit-bearing rate,single melon weight,yield and soluble solid content of nine cultivars of melon planted in the large plastic house with single chief vine pruning were compared,secondary vine pruning or double secondary vine pruning were compared.The results indicated that : the blossom fruit period of the nine cultivars with the single chief vine pruning was 1～3days later than those of the others.The order of fruit-bearing rate was secondary vine pruningdouble secondary vine pruningsingle chief vine pruning.The yields of majority cultivars with double secondary vine pruning and single secondary vine pruning were higher than that of chief vine pruning.However,the pruning ways slightly affected the single melon weight and soluble solid content of melon.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Single chief vine pruning delayed the blossom fruit period of nine melon cultivars by 1～3 days.
- Taxon
- Cucumis melo
.jpg?width=60)
Cucumis meloe0 - Treatment
- single chief vine pruninge1
- Outcome
- blossom fruit periode1
- Direction
- latere1
- Value
- 1～3dayse1
- Comparator
- those of the otherse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“quality of melon(Cucumis melo L.var.makuwa Makino)”
e1“blossom fruit period of the nine cultivars with the single chief vine pruning was 1～3days later than those of the others”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit-bearing rate ranked secondary vine pruning above double secondary and single chief vine pruning.
- Taxon
- Cucumis meloCucumis meloe0
- Treatment
- secondary vine pruninge2
- Outcome
- order of fruit-bearing ratee2
- Direction
- order of fruit-bearing ratee2
- Comparator
- single chief vine pruninge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“quality of melon(Cucumis melo L.var.makuwa Makino)”
e2“The order of fruit-bearing rate was secondary vine pruningdouble secondary vine pruningsingle chief vine pruning”
Claim · model-written summary
Yields of most melon cultivars were higher with double secondary and single secondary vine pruning than with chief vine pruning.
- Taxon
- Cucumis meloCucumis meloe0
- Treatment
- double secondary vine pruning and single secondary vine pruninge3
- Outcome
- yieldse3
- Direction
- highere3
- Qualifier
- majority cultivarse3
- Comparator
- chief vine pruninge3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“quality of melon(Cucumis melo L.var.makuwa Makino)”
e3“The yields of majority cultivars with double secondary vine pruning and single secondary vine pruning were higher than that of chief vine pruning”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning ways slightly affected single melon weight and soluble solid content.
- Taxon
- Cucumis meloCucumis meloe0
- Treatment
- pruning wayse4
- Outcome
- single melon weight and soluble solid contente4
- Direction
- slightly affectede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“quality of melon(Cucumis melo L.var.makuwa Makino)”
e4“the pruning ways slightly affected the single melon weight and soluble solid content of melon”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →pruning · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.