Paper · 2011 · Mailei zuowu xuebao

Effect of Irrigation on Sugar Content in Flag Leaf and Grain,and Yield of Super-high-yield Wheat at Grain-Filling Stage

Zhai Yan-ju

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To determine feasible irrigation stage and amount for super-high-yield land and excavate the yield potential of super-high-yield wheat,the effects of irrigation stage and amount on the dynamic changes of soluble sugar and sucrose in flag leaf and grain,and yield of super-high-yield wheat at filling stage were evaluated in super-high-yield land of Jinhai seed limited company.The results indicated that irrigation increased the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose of super-high-yield wheat at grain filling stage compared with the control,and the grain yield of super-high-yield wheat significantly increased.In the 2009-2010 growing season with rainfall of 291.7 mm,the treatment T5 was irrigated 60 mm at wintering,jointing and filling stage respectively,of which the contents of soluble sugar and sucrose were the highest and the transformation of soluble sugar and sucrose was the most thorough,and its yield was supreme up to super-high-yield level(9 923.58 kg·hm-2).Increasing irrigation amount(T7 and T8),the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose,grains per spike,1000-grain weight and water use efficiency decreased significantly,which leaded to yield reduction.So under the experimental conditions,irrigated 60 mm at wintering,jointing and filling stage respectively was the feasible irrigation scheme to super-high-yield land.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased soluble sugar and sucrose metabolic activity during grain filling.

Organ / stage
grain filling stagee0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrosee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation increased the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose of super-high-yield wheat at grain filling stage compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly increased grain yield.

Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of super-high-yield wheat significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–621 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation increased the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose of super-high-yield wheat at grain filling stage compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–551 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–551 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced the highest soluble sugar and sucrose contents.

Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
contents of soluble sugar and sucrosee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T5 was irrigated 60 mm at wintering,jointing and filling stage respectively,of which the contents of soluble sugar and sucrose were the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced the most thorough sugar transformation.

Outcome
transformation of soluble sugar and sucrosee0
Direction
most thoroughe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the transformation of soluble sugar and sucrose was the most thorough”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 yield reached 9 923.58 kg·hm-2.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
supremee0
Value
9 923.58 kg·hm-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its yield was supreme up to super-high-yield level(9 923.58 kg·hm-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher irrigation amount reduced sugar metabolic activity significantly.

Treatment
Increasing irrigation amounte0
Outcome
metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrosee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing irrigation amount(T7 and T8),the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose,grains per spike,1000-grain weight and water use efficiency decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher irrigation amount reduced grains per spike significantly.

Treatment
Increasing irrigation amounte0
Outcome
grains per spikee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing irrigation amount(T7 and T8),the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose,grains per spike,1000-grain weight and water use efficiency decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher irrigation amount reduced 1000-grain weight significantly.

Treatment
Increasing irrigation amounte0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing irrigation amount(T7 and T8),the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose,grains per spike,1000-grain weight and water use efficiency decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher irrigation amount reduced water use efficiency significantly.

Treatment
Increasing irrigation amounte0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing irrigation amount(T7 and T8),the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose,grains per spike,1000-grain weight and water use efficiency decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher irrigation amount reduced yield.

Treatment
Increasing irrigation amounte1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which leaded to yield reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing irrigation amount(T7 and T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1024 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 60 mm at wintering, jointing and filling.

Treatment
irrigated 60 mm at wintering,jointing and filling stagee0
Outcome
feasible irrigation schemee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated 60 mm at wintering,jointing and filling stage respectively was the feasible irrigation scheme”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.