Abstract
To determine feasible irrigation stage and amount for super-high-yield land and excavate the yield potential of super-high-yield wheat,the effects of irrigation stage and amount on the dynamic changes of soluble sugar and sucrose in flag leaf and grain,and yield of super-high-yield wheat at filling stage were evaluated in super-high-yield land of Jinhai seed limited company.The results indicated that irrigation increased the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose of super-high-yield wheat at grain filling stage compared with the control,and the grain yield of super-high-yield wheat significantly increased.In the 2009-2010 growing season with rainfall of 291.7 mm,the treatment T5 was irrigated 60 mm at wintering,jointing and filling stage respectively,of which the contents of soluble sugar and sucrose were the highest and the transformation of soluble sugar and sucrose was the most thorough,and its yield was supreme up to super-high-yield level(9 923.58 kg·hm-2).Increasing irrigation amount(T7 and T8),the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose,grains per spike,1000-grain weight and water use efficiency decreased significantly,which leaded to yield reduction.So under the experimental conditions,irrigated 60 mm at wintering,jointing and filling stage respectively was the feasible irrigation scheme to super-high-yield land.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation increased soluble sugar and sucrose metabolic activity during grain filling.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Organ / stage
- grain filling stagee0
- Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrosee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“irrigation increased the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose of super-high-yield wheat at grain filling stage compared with the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation significantly increased grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- irrigatione1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- the controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the grain yield of super-high-yield wheat significantly increased”
e1“irrigation increased the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose of super-high-yield wheat at grain filling stage compared with the control”
e2“compared with the control”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 produced the highest soluble sugar and sucrose contents.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- T5e0
- Outcome
- contents of soluble sugar and sucrosee0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the treatment T5 was irrigated 60 mm at wintering,jointing and filling stage respectively,of which the contents of soluble sugar and sucrose were the highest”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 produced the most thorough sugar transformation.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- transformation of soluble sugar and sucrosee0
- Direction
- most thoroughe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the transformation of soluble sugar and sucrose was the most thorough”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 yield reached 9 923.58 kg·hm-2.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- supremee0
- Value
- 9 923.58 kg·hm-2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“its yield was supreme up to super-high-yield level(9 923.58 kg·hm-2)”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher irrigation amount reduced sugar metabolic activity significantly.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Increasing irrigation amounte0
- Outcome
- metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrosee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing irrigation amount(T7 and T8),the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose,grains per spike,1000-grain weight and water use efficiency decreased significantly”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher irrigation amount reduced grains per spike significantly.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Increasing irrigation amounte0
- Outcome
- grains per spikee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing irrigation amount(T7 and T8),the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose,grains per spike,1000-grain weight and water use efficiency decreased significantly”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher irrigation amount reduced 1000-grain weight significantly.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Increasing irrigation amounte0
- Outcome
- 1000-grain weighte0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing irrigation amount(T7 and T8),the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose,grains per spike,1000-grain weight and water use efficiency decreased significantly”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher irrigation amount reduced water use efficiency significantly.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Increasing irrigation amounte0
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing irrigation amount(T7 and T8),the metabolic activity of soluble sugar and sucrose,grains per spike,1000-grain weight and water use efficiency decreased significantly”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher irrigation amount reduced yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Increasing irrigation amounte1
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“which leaded to yield reduction”
t0“Wheat”
e1“Increasing irrigation amount(T7 and T8)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 60 mm at wintering, jointing and filling.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- irrigated 60 mm at wintering,jointing and filling stagee0
- Outcome
- feasible irrigation schemee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“irrigated 60 mm at wintering,jointing and filling stage respectively was the feasible irrigation scheme”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
299 papers more in this group
See all 303 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.