Paper · 2014 · Tianjin Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Iron Deficiency Stress on Growth and Development of Wheat in Nutrient Solution

Yin Wen-jua

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper adopted solution culture,compared the physiological and biochemical indexes of wheat under the normal supply iron and iron-deficiency stress,simultaneous setting oxygen and hypoxia two processing.The results showed that the plant height and wheatear height of the wheat were the largest under the complete solution and adding oxygen treatment,reached 51.0 cm and 7.5 cm.Iron deficiency stress decreased kernel length,kernel width,kernel thickness and kernel number per spike.Aerobic treatment of wheat chlorophyll concentration were higher than the anaerobic treatment of wheat.Due to iron deficiency stress,root Fe3+educates activity to achieve17.3 μmol·g-1·(2h)-1.Iron deficient treatment reduced iron content of aerial part of wheat,more apparently in a good aeration condition.There was an antagonism relationship between Fe and the microelements Mn or Cu.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete solution with added oxygen produced the greatest wheat plant height, 51.0 cm.

Treatment
complete solution and adding oxygen treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
largeste0
Value
51.0 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plant height and wheatear height of the wheat were the largest under the complete solution and adding oxygen treatment,reached 51.0 cm and 7.5 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete solution with added oxygen produced the greatest wheatear height, 7.5 cm.

Treatment
complete solution and adding oxygen treatmente0
Outcome
wheatear heighte0
Direction
largeste0
Value
7.5 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plant height and wheatear height of the wheat were the largest under the complete solution and adding oxygen treatment,reached 51.0 cm and 7.5 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron deficiency reduced wheat kernel length, width, and thickness.

Treatment
Iron deficiency stresse0
Outcome
kernel length,kernel width,kernel thicknesse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron deficiency stress decreased kernel length,kernel width,kernel thickness and kernel number per spike.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron deficiency reduced wheat kernel number per spike.

Treatment
Iron deficiency stresse0
Outcome
kernel number per spikee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron deficiency stress decreased kernel length,kernel width,kernel thickness and kernel number per spike.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerobic wheat treatment yielded higher chlorophyll concentration than anaerobic treatment.

Treatment
Aerobic treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
anaerobic treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aerobic treatment of wheat chlorophyll concentration were higher than the anaerobic treatment of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under iron deficiency, wheat root Fe3+educates activity reached 17.3 μmol·g-1·(2h)-1.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
iron deficiency stresse0
Outcome
Fe3+educates activitye0
Value
17.3 μmol·g-1·(2h)-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to iron deficiency stress,root Fe3+educates activity to achieve17.3 μmol·g-1·(2h)-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron deficiency lowered iron content of aerial wheat parts, especially with good aeration.

Organ / stage
aerial parte0
Treatment
Iron deficient treatmente0
Outcome
iron contente0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
good aeration conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron deficient treatment reduced iron content of aerial part of wheat,more apparently in a good aeration condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron had an antagonistic relationship with Mn or Cu in wheat.

Compound
Fe and the microelements Mn or Cue0
Outcome
antagonism relationshipe0
Direction
antagonisme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was an antagonism relationship between Fe and the microelements Mn or Cu.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.