Abstract
The technology of fertilization through drip irrigation is a comprehensive management measure for the sustainable development of modern agriculture.An outdoor pot experiment of sugarcane,in which four treatments with different time distribution of N and K fertilizer under drip irrigation and one normal planting treatment are set,is conducted to evaluate sugarcane response to the time distribution of N and K fertilizer.The results show that fertilization through drip irrigation promotes the growth of sugarcane evidently.Higher yield is obtained under the condition of fertilization through drip irrigation than the condition of normal fertilizing mode,while the N K fertilizer quantity of the front is only half of the latter.Furthermore,the time distribution of N K fertilizer under drip irrigation has notable influence on the yield and quality of sugarcane.The effect of the treatment,in which the time distribution of N K fertilizer in seedling tillering Stage,elongation stage,mature stage is 20%,60% and 20%,respectively,is the best.The stem length,yield,quality and root system of sugarcane of the treatment are all better than other treatments.The single stem weight reaches 1.92kg and the sugar content reaches 17.26%.The fertilization through drip irrigation has not only economic benefit,but also environment benefit.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Drip fertilization promoted sugarcane growth.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“fertilization through drip irrigation promotes the growth of sugarcane evidently”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip fertilization gave higher yield than normal fertilization with half the fertilizer quantity.
Verbatim
e0“Higher yield is obtained under the condition of fertilization through drip irrigation than the condition of normal fertilizing mode,while the N K fertilizer quantity of the front is only half of the latter”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer timing under drip irrigation notably influenced sugarcane yield and quality.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- time distribution of N K fertilizer under drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- yield and qualitye0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“the time distribution of N K fertilizer under drip irrigation has notable influence on the yield and quality of sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The 20%, 60%, 20% fertilizer timing across seedling tillering, elongation and maturity performed best.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- time distribution of N K fertilizer in seedling tillering Stage,elongation stage,mature stage is 20%,60% and 20%e0
- Outcome
- the beste0
- Direction
- the beste0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The effect of the treatment,in which the time distribution of N K fertilizer in seedling tillering Stage,elongation stage,mature stage is 20%,60% and 20%,respectively,is the best”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The best fertilizer timing produced superior stem length, yield, quality and roots compared with other treatments.
Verbatim
e0“The stem length,yield,quality and root system of sugarcane of the treatment are all better than other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Single stem weight reached 1.92kg under the best timing.
Verbatim
e0“The single stem weight reaches 1.92kg”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugar content reached 17.26% under the best timing.
Verbatim
e0“the sugar content reaches 17.26%”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip fertilization was judged to have economic and environmental benefits.
Verbatim
e0“The fertilization through drip irrigation has not only economic benefit,but also environment benefit”
t0“Sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
138 papers more in this group
See all 142 papers →fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
143 papers more in this group
See all 147 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.