Paper · 2013 · Northern Horticulture

Effects of 6-BA on Photosynthesis and Berry Quality in Grapevine Infected by Grapevine Roll-leaf Virus

Zhenping Wang

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Taking Vitis vinifera L.cv.Carbernet gernischet which infected by grapevine roll-leaf virus-III as materials,the effects of the relationship of 6-BA on the photosynthesis and berry quality in infected virus grape were studied.The results showed that the virus content in leaves was not affected by 6-BA treatments.The chlorophll content,activities of Rubisco and RCA increased,the rate of chlorophyll degradation decreased in the condition of foliar sprayed 6-BA,and the foliar photosynthesis rate increased too.In all treatment,40 mg/L 6-BA significantly improved chlorophyll photosynthetic rate and fruit quality.From above results,it concluded that foliar spray of suitable concentration 6-BA could improve photosynthetic efficiency and fruit quality of infected virus grapevine by regulated chlorophyll degradation and assimilate transportation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 6-BA did not change the virus content in grapevine leaves.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae0
Material
Carbernet gernischete0
Treatment
6-BA treatmentse1
Interactor
grapevine roll-leaf virus-IIIe0pathogen
Outcome
virus content in leavese1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Taking Vitis vinifera L.cv.Carbernet gernischet which infected by grapevine roll-leaf virus-III as materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the virus content in leaves was not affected by 6-BA treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-sprayed 6-BA increased chlorophyll content and Rubisco and RCA activities in virus-infected grapevine.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae0
Treatment
foliar sprayed 6-BAe2
Interactor
grapevine roll-leaf virus-IIIe0pathogen
Outcome
chlorophll content,activities of Rubisco and RCAe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Taking Vitis vinifera L.cv.Carbernet gernischet which infected by grapevine roll-leaf virus-III as materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“The chlorophll content,activities of Rubisco and RCA increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–376 · show in text ↑
e2

“the rate of chlorophyll degradation decreased in the condition of foliar sprayed 6-BA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-sprayed 6-BA decreased the rate of chlorophyll degradation in virus-infected grapevine.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae0
Treatment
foliar sprayed 6-BAe1
Interactor
grapevine roll-leaf virus-IIIe0pathogen
Outcome
rate of chlorophyll degradatione1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Taking Vitis vinifera L.cv.Carbernet gernischet which infected by grapevine roll-leaf virus-III as materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rate of chlorophyll degradation decreased in the condition of foliar sprayed 6-BA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-sprayed 6-BA increased the foliar photosynthesis rate of virus-infected grapevine.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae0
Treatment
foliar sprayed 6-BAe1
Interactor
grapevine roll-leaf virus-IIIe0pathogen
Outcome
foliar photosynthesis ratee2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Taking Vitis vinifera L.cv.Carbernet gernischet which infected by grapevine roll-leaf virus-III as materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rate of chlorophyll degradation decreased in the condition of foliar sprayed 6-BA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“the foliar photosynthesis rate increased too”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

40 mg/L 6-BA significantly improved chlorophyll photosynthetic rate and fruit quality of virus-infected grapevine.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae0
Treatment
40 mg/L 6-BAe1
Interactor
grapevine roll-leaf virus-IIIe0pathogen
Outcome
chlorophyll photosynthetic rate and fruit qualitye1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Taking Vitis vinifera L.cv.Carbernet gernischet which infected by grapevine roll-leaf virus-III as materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“In all treatment,40 mg/L 6-BA significantly improved chlorophyll photosynthetic rate and fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–614 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 6-BA is concluded to improve photosynthetic efficiency and fruit quality by regulating chlorophyll degradation and assimilate transportation.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Treatment
foliar spray of suitable concentration 6-BAe0
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiency and fruit qualitye0
Qualifier
regulated chlorophyll degradation and assimilate transportatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of suitable concentration 6-BA could improve photosynthetic efficiency and fruit quality of infected virus grapevine by regulated chlorophyll degradation and assimilate transportation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–848 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · physiology: pigments · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.