Paper · 2009 · Zhongguo gua-cai

Application of Biological Composting Technology to the Production of Cucumber in Greenhouse

GU Rong-kui

10
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The application of biological compost to the production of cucumber in greenhouse was investigated. With the application of biological composting technique average daily temperature(20 cm soil surface)was increased by 4-7 ℃,CO2 concentration was reached 713-2 275 μL/L(178%-558% of the control). These increases were good enough for normal growth and fruit development of cucumber plants. The index of healthy seedling in the treated area was significantly higher than control. Plants in treated area had better root system,healthier plant,less diseases,7-15 days earlier harvest,and 40.3% higher early yield. The plants in treated area produced more marketable fruits,better fruit quality,longer harvesting period and therefore 32.6%-44.9% higher total yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological composting increased soil temperature by 4-7 ℃.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biological composting techniquee0
Outcome
average daily temperaturee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4-7 ℃e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the application of biological composting technique average daily temperature(20 cm soil surface)was increased by 4-7 ℃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological composting raised CO2 concentration to 713-2 275 μL/L, 178%-558% of control.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biological composting techniquee1
Outcome
CO2 concentratione0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
713-2 275 μL/Le0
Qualifier
178%-558%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO2 concentration was reached 713-2 275 μL/L(178%-558% of the control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of biological composting technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated cucumber seedlings had a significantly higher healthy seedling index than control.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biological composting techniquee1
Outcome
index of healthy seedlinge0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The index of healthy seedling in the treated area was significantly higher than control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of biological composting technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated cucumber plants had better root systems and healthier plants.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biological composting techniquee1
Outcome
better root system,healthier plante0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants in treated area had better root system,healthier plant,less diseases,7-15 days earlier harvest,and 40.3% higher early yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of biological composting technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated cucumber plants had less disease.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biological composting techniquee1
Outcome
diseasese0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants in treated area had better root system,healthier plant,less diseases,7-15 days earlier harvest,and 40.3% higher early yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of biological composting technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treated cucumber harvest was 7-15 days earlier.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biological composting techniquee1
Outcome
harveste0
Direction
earliere0
Value
7-15 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“7-15 days earlier harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of biological composting technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated cucumber early yield was 40.3% higher.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biological composting techniquee1
Outcome
early yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
40.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“40.3% higher early yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of biological composting technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated cucumber plants produced more marketable fruits and better fruit quality.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biological composting techniquee1
Outcome
marketable fruits,better fruit qualitye0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants in treated area produced more marketable fruits,better fruit quality,longer harvesting period and therefore 32.6%-44.9% higher total yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of biological composting technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated cucumber plants had a longer harvesting period.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biological composting techniquee1
Outcome
harvesting periode0
Direction
longere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longer harvesting period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of biological composting technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated cucumber total yield was 32.6%-44.9% higher.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biological composting techniquee1
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
32.6%-44.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“32.6%-44.9% higher total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of biological composting technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–155 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: physics · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

fertilization · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 40 positive, 5 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 179 positive, 23 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.