Paper · 2012 · Hubei nongye kexue

Effect of Heat-shock and ABA Application on the Growth of Cotton in the Field

Guozheng Yang

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of heat shock at germinating seed(42 ℃,2 h),abscisic acid(ABA) treating,foliar spraying and root infiltration in period of two leaves on the growth of cotton under the conditions of drought and high temperature were studied.The results showed that,①Under drought and high temperature,a group of specific protein in treatments except for the foliar spraying treatment were produced compared with control.More HSP was synthesized in ABA and heat shock treatment than the root infiltration.②The activity of SOD,CAT and POD was significantly improved by ABA;while SOD and CAT activity was significantly improved by heat shock treatment.Root infiltration and foliar spraying increased the activity of CAT and SOD respectively.③MDA content in groups of heat shock,ABA treating and root infiltration were significantly higher than that in control;while the difference between foliar spraying and control was not significant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments except foliar spray produced specific proteins relative to control.

Treatment
treatments except for the foliar spraying treatmente0
Outcome
a group of specific proteine0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought and high temperature,a group of specific protein in treatments except for the foliar spraying treatment were produced compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–415 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA and heat shock synthesized more HSP than root infiltration.

Treatment
ABA and heat shock treatmente0
Outcome
HSPe0
Direction
Moree0
Comparator
root infiltratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More HSP was synthesized in ABA and heat shock treatment than the root infiltration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA significantly increased SOD, CAT and POD activity.

Treatment
ABAe0
Outcome
activity of SOD,CAT and PODe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of SOD,CAT and POD was significantly improved by ABA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock significantly increased SOD and CAT activity.

Treatment
heat shock treatmente0
Outcome
SOD and CAT activitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SOD and CAT activity was significantly improved by heat shock treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root infiltration increased CAT activity.

Treatment
Root infiltratione0
Outcome
CATe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root infiltration and foliar spraying increased the activity of CAT and SOD respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying increased SOD activity.

Treatment
foliar sprayinge0
Outcome
SODe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root infiltration and foliar spraying increased the activity of CAT and SOD respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock, ABA and root infiltration raised MDA above control.

Treatment
heat shock,ABA treating and root infiltratione0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDA content in groups of heat shock,ABA treating and root infiltration were significantly higher than that in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying did not differ significantly from control for MDA.

Treatment
foliar sprayinge0
Outcome
differencee0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the difference between foliar spraying and control was not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

heat · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.