Paper · 2013 · Shanxi nongye kexue

Influence of Mineral Nutrition on the Cracking Rate and Quality of Jujube Fruit

Li Ji

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To investigate the effect of spraying nutrient solution treatments on cracking rate and quality of jujube fruit,we used the 3 years old 'Huping' jujube as the materials.The results showed that: Spraying nutrient solution treatments decreased significantly the fruit cracking rate;Among the spraying nutrient solution treatments,H2 and H3 treatments increased significantly the longitudinal diameter and increased very significantly the transverse diameter of jujube fruit compared with that in the CK;There was no significant difference between the nutrient solution treatments and the CK on the content of fruit soluble sugar and Ca,K,Mg,Fe,Mn elements,only the H1 treatment increased significantly the content of Zn in jujube fruit compared with CK;The other spraying nutrient solution treatments were similar to CK,except that the H2 treatment significantly reduced the content of Vitamin C in jujube fruit.In one word,H3 treatment was the optimum to control the cracking rate and no negative influence to the normal quality of jujube fruit at the mean time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nutrient solution treatments significantly decreased the fruit cracking rate of jujube.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
Spraying nutrient solution treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit cracking ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying nutrient solution treatments decreased significantly the fruit cracking rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jujube Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

H2 and H3 treatments significantly increased the longitudinal diameter of jujube fruit compared with CK.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
H2 and H3 treatmentse0
Outcome
longitudinal diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“H2 and H3 treatments increased significantly the longitudinal diameter and increased very significantly the transverse diameter of jujube fruit compared with that in the CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jujube Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

H2 and H3 treatments very significantly increased the transverse diameter of jujube fruit compared with CK.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
H2 and H3 treatmentse0
Outcome
transverse diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“H2 and H3 treatments increased significantly the longitudinal diameter and increased very significantly the transverse diameter of jujube fruit compared with that in the CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jujube Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient solution treatments did not differ significantly from CK in fruit soluble sugar content.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
nutrient solution treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit soluble sugare0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference between the nutrient solution treatments and the CK on the content of fruit soluble sugar and Ca,K,Mg,Fe,Mn elements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jujube Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient solution treatments did not differ significantly from CK in Ca, K and Mg content of jujube fruit.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
nutrient solution treatmentse0
Outcome
Ca,K,Mge0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference between the nutrient solution treatments and the CK on the content of fruit soluble sugar and Ca,K,Mg,Fe,Mn elements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jujube Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient solution treatments did not differ significantly from CK in Fe and Mn content of jujube fruit.

Taxon
Jujubet0
Treatment
nutrient solution treatmentse0
Outcome
Fe,Mne0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference between the nutrient solution treatments and the CK on the content of fruit soluble sugar and Ca,K,Mg,Fe,Mn elements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jujube Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the H1 treatment significantly increased Zn content in jujube fruit compared with CK.

Taxon
jujubee0
Treatment
H1 treatmente0
Outcome
content of Zne0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“only the H1 treatment increased significantly the content of Zn in jujube fruit compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The H2 treatment significantly reduced vitamin C content in jujube fruit relative to CK.

Taxon
jujubee0
Treatment
H2 treatmente0
Outcome
content of Vitamin Ce0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

e0

“The other spraying nutrient solution treatments were similar to CK,except that the H2 treatment significantly reduced the content of Vitamin C in jujube fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–909 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude the H3 treatment was the optimum for controlling cracking rate without negatively affecting normal fruit quality.

Taxon
jujubee0
Treatment
H3 treatmente0
Outcome
control the cracking ratee0

Verbatim

e0

“H3 treatment was the optimum to control the cracking rate and no negative influence to the normal quality of jujube fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1043 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Ziziphus jujuba (Chinese jujube)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.