Paper · 1994 · Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University

Growth, Canopy Structure and Seed Yield of Mungbean as influenced by Water Stress

Muhammad Tajul Islam; Fumitake Kubota; Waichi Agata

18
claims
38
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Growth, canopy and seed yield of mungbean were evaluated under water stress conditions at the Kyushu University Experimental Farm during the summer of 1992. Waterlogging, optimum moisture (control) and drought conditions constituted the treatments. The treatments were initiated before the onset of flowering. The results indicated that both the water stress (waterlogging and drought stress) treatments had significant adverse affect on the morpho-physiological characters of mungbean. Plants under waterlogging conditions were affected more in most of the characters studied. Lower leaf area production, low CGR and low NAR contributed to the low TDW of the waterlogged plants compared to the other two treatments.At final harvest, the difference between the two stress treatments was about 10%. The distribution pattern of the dry matter was more or less similar in all the treatments except for roots. Among the treatments, drought stressed roots had the highest dry matter and the waterlogged roots had the lowest. The roots of the waterlogged plants became fibrous. There were distinct variations in the canopy structures under different treatment conditions. Most of the foliage for plants under control and waterlogged conditions were distributed in between upper and middle strata of the canopy, while for drought stress it was from middle to lower strata. There was increase in stem dry weight with decrease in height from the top regardless of the treatments.Th maximum value for light extinction coefficient (0.82) was in the waterlogged plants. Significantly high seed yield (7.06 g per plant) was obtained in control treatment followed by drought stress (4.21 g) and waterlogging (2.30 g). Seeds per plant and pods per plant contributed more to the seed yield per plant than the other yield contributing components. It is evident from this study that mungbeangrowth, canopy and seed yield are more susceptible to waterlogging than drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly harmed mungbean morphophysiological characters

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
morpho-physiological characterse0
Direction
adversee0
Comparator
optimum moisture (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both the water stress (waterlogging and drought stress) treatments had significant adverse affect on the morpho-physiological characters of mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–485 · show in text ↑
e1

“optimum moisture (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly harmed mungbean morphophysiological characters

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
morpho-physiological characterse0
Direction
adversee0
Comparator
optimum moisture (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both the water stress (waterlogging and drought stress) treatments had significant adverse affect on the morpho-physiological characters of mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–485 · show in text ↑
e1

“optimum moisture (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–197 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging affected most measured characters more than drought

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
waterlogging conditionse0
Outcome
most of the characters studiede0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants under waterlogging conditions were affected more in most of the characters studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogged plants had lower leaf area production, CGR, NAR and TDW than other treatments

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
waterloggede0
Outcome
leaf area production, low CGR and low NARe0
Direction
Lowere0
Comparator
other two treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower leaf area production, low CGR and low NAR contributed to the low TDW of the waterlogged plants compared to the other two treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At final harvest, the two stress treatments differed by about 10%

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
difference between the two stress treatmentse0
Value
about 10%e0
Comparator
two stress treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At final harvest, the difference between the two stress treatments was about 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter distribution was similar among treatments except for roots

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
distribution pattern of the dry mattere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The distribution pattern of the dry matter was more or less similar in all the treatments except for roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-stressed roots had the highest dry matter

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
drought stressede0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stressed roots had the highest dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogged roots had the lowest dry matter

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
waterloggede0
Outcome
dry mattere1
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the waterlogged roots had the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1018 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought stressed roots had the highest dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots of waterlogged mungbean became fibrous

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
became fibrouse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The roots of the waterlogged plants became fibrous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy structures varied distinctly by treatment

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
distinct variations in the canopy structurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were distinct variations in the canopy structures under different treatment conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control and waterlogged foliage was concentrated in upper and middle canopy strata

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
foliage for plants under control and waterlogged conditions were distributed in between upper and middle strata of the canopye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the foliage for plants under control and waterlogged conditions were distributed in between upper and middle strata of the canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-stressed foliage was concentrated in middle and lower strata

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
middle to lower stratae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for drought stress it was from middle to lower strata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1364 · show in text ↑
e1

“Most of the foliage for plants under control and waterlogged conditions were distributed in between upper and middle strata of the canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem dry weight rose with distance from the canopy top across treatments

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
stem dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was increase in stem dry weight with decrease in height from the top regardless of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1469 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogged plants had the maximum light extinction coefficient of 0.82

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
waterloggede0
Outcome
light extinction coefficiente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.82e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum value for light extinction coefficient (0.82) was in the waterlogged plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants yielded 7.06 g seed per plant, significantly more than stressed plants

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highe0
Value
7.06 g per plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly high seed yield (7.06 g per plant) was obtained in control treatment followed by drought stress (4.21 g) and waterlogging (2.30 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-stressed plants yielded 4.21 g seed per plant

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
4.21 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield (7.06 g per plant) was obtained in control treatment followed by drought stress (4.21 g) and waterlogging (2.30 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogged plants yielded 2.30 g seed per plant

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
2.30 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield (7.06 g per plant) was obtained in control treatment followed by drought stress (4.21 g) and waterlogging (2.30 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds per plant and pods per plant contributed more to seed yield than other components

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
seed yield per plante0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other yield contributing componentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeds per plant and pods per plant contributed more to the seed yield per plant than the other yield contributing components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑