Paper · 2013 · HortScience

Exogenous Applications of Benzyladenine and Gibberellic Acid Inhibit Lower-leaf Senescence of Geraniums during Propagation

Christopher J. Currey; Roberto G. Lopez; Vijay K. Rapaka; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

After postharvest shipping, the lower leaves of zonal geranium ( Pelargonium × hortorum ) cuttings often turn chlorotic and necrotic during rooting in a propagation environment. Our objective was to quantify the efficacy of spray applications of the plant growth regulators (PGRs) benzyladenine (BA) and/or gibberellic acid (GA) at various stages in propagation to reduce lower-leaf senescence and evaluate effects on subsequent rooting. In Expt. 1, cuttings of ‘Patriot White’ geraniums were harvested and treated with BA (2.5 or 5.0 mg·L −1 ), BA + GA 4+7 (2.5 or 5.0 mg·L −1 each), or GA 3 (0.5 or 2.0 mg·L −1 ) either before or after a 2-day storage period simulating commercial shipping. Post-shipment application of all PGRs eliminated leaf yellowing compared with cuttings treated pre-shipment, but rooting was inhibited. In Expt. 2, the promotion of rooting from a rooting hormone preceding treatment with BA (1.25 to 5.0 mg·L −1 ), BA+GA 4+7 (1.25 to 5.0 mg·L −1 each), or GA 3 (0.25 to 2.0 mg·L −1 ) was evaluated on ‘Patriot White’ geranium cuttings after a 2-day simulated shipping. Applying rooting hormones increased the percentage of fully rooted cuttings treated with BA and/or GA from 16.4% to 51.8%. In Expt. 3, cuttings of different geranium cultivars from a commercial producer varied in susceptibility and suppression of leaf yellowing after BA + GA 4+7 applications. We conclude that foliar applications of BA + GA 4+7 can suppress lower-leaf senescence and rooting during propagation of some geranium cultivars, and the inhibition of rooting can be at least partially overcome with an application of rooting hormone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-shipment plant growth regulator application eliminated leaf yellowing relative to pre-shipment application.

Taxon
GeraniumsGeraniumt0
Treatment
Post-shipment application of all PGRse0
Outcome
leaf yellowinge0
Direction
eliminatede0
Comparator
cuttings treated pre-shipmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Geranium
Geranium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-shipment application of all PGRs eliminated leaf yellowing compared with cuttings treated pre-shipment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Geraniums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-shipment application of plant growth regulators inhibited rooting.

Taxon
GeraniumsGeraniumt0
Treatment
Post-shipment application of all PGRse0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
cuttings treated pre-shipmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Geranium
Geranium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-shipment application of all PGRs eliminated leaf yellowing compared with cuttings treated pre-shipment, but rooting was inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Geraniums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting hormones increased fully rooted BA and/or GA treated cuttings from 16.4% to 51.8%.

Taxon
GeraniumsGeraniumt0
Treatment
Applying rooting hormonese0
Outcome
percentage of fully rooted cuttingse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
from 16.4% to 51.8%e0
Comparator
cuttings treated with BA and/or GAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Geranium
Geranium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying rooting hormones increased the percentage of fully rooted cuttings treated with BA and/or GA from 16.4% to 51.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Geraniums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Geranium cultivars differed in susceptibility to leaf yellowing and its suppression by BA plus GA.

Taxon
GeraniumsGeraniumt0
Material
different geranium cultivarse0
Treatment
BA + GA 4+7 applicationse0
Outcome
susceptibility and suppression of leaf yellowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Geranium
Geranium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cuttings of different geranium cultivars from a commercial producer varied in susceptibility and suppression of leaf yellowing after BA + GA 4+7 applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1387 · show in text ↑
t0

“Geraniums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–103 · show in text ↑

class · growth · GeraniumPositive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.