Paper · 2013 · PubMed

[Effects of nighttime warming on winter wheat root growth and soil nutrient availability].

Ming-Qian Zhang; Jin Chen; Jia Guo; et al.

20
claims
37
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Climate warming has an obvious asymmetry between day and night, with a greater increment of air temperature at nighttime than at daytime. By adopting passive nighttime warming (PNW) system, a two-year field experiment of nighttime warming was conducted in the main production areas of winter wheat in China (Shijiazhuang of Hebei Province, Xuzhou of Jiangsu Province, Xuchang of Henan Province, and Zhenjiang of Jiangsu Province) in 2009 and 2010, with the responses of soil pH and available nutrient contents during the whole growth periods and of wheat root characteristics at heading stage determined. As compared with the control (no nighttime warming), nighttime warming decreased the soil pH and available nutrient contents significantly, and increased the root dry mass and root/shoot ratio to a certain extent. During the whole growth period of winter wheat, nighttime warming decreased the soil pH in Shijiazhuang, Xuzhou, Xuchang, and Zhenjiang averagely by 0.4%, 0.4%, 0.7%, and 0.9%, the soil alkaline nitrogen content averagely by 8.1%, 8.1%, 7.1%, and 6.0%, the soil available phosphorus content averagely by 15.7%, 12.1%, 19.6%, and 25.8%, and the soil available potassium content averagely by 11.5%, 7.6%, 7.6% , and 10.1%, respectively. However, nighttime warming increased the wheat root dry mass at heading stage in Shijiazhuang, Xuzhou, and Zhenjiang averagely by 31. 5% , 27.0%, and 14.5%, and the root/shoot ratio at heading stage in Shijiazhuang, Xuchang, and Zhenjiang averagely by 23.8%, 13.7% and 9.7%, respectively. Our results indicated that nighttime warming could affect the soil nutrient supply and winter wheat growth via affecting the soil chemical properties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil pH by 0.4% in Shijiazhuang.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nighttime warminge0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.4%e0
Setting
Shijiazhuange0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nighttime warming decreased the soil pH in Shijiazhuang, Xuzhou, Xuchang, and Zhenjiang averagely by 0.4%, 0.4%, 0.7%, and 0.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil pH by 0.4% in Xuzhou.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nighttime warminge0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.4%e0
Setting
Xuzhoue0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nighttime warming decreased the soil pH in Shijiazhuang, Xuzhou, Xuchang, and Zhenjiang averagely by 0.4%, 0.4%, 0.7%, and 0.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil pH by 0.7% in Xuchang.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nighttime warminge0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.7%e0
Setting
Xuchange0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nighttime warming decreased the soil pH in Shijiazhuang, Xuzhou, Xuchang, and Zhenjiang averagely by 0.4%, 0.4%, 0.7%, and 0.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil pH by 0.9% in Zhenjiang.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nighttime warminge0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.9%e0
Setting
Zhenjiange0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nighttime warming decreased the soil pH in Shijiazhuang, Xuzhou, Xuchang, and Zhenjiang averagely by 0.4%, 0.4%, 0.7%, and 0.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil alkaline nitrogen content by 8.1% in Shijiazhuang.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
soil alkaline nitrogen contente0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
8.1%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil alkaline nitrogen content averagely by 8.1%, 8.1%, 7.1%, and 6.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil alkaline nitrogen content by 8.1% in Xuzhou.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
soil alkaline nitrogen contente0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
8.1%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil alkaline nitrogen content averagely by 8.1%, 8.1%, 7.1%, and 6.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil alkaline nitrogen content by 7.1% in Xuchang.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
soil alkaline nitrogen contente0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
7.1%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil alkaline nitrogen content averagely by 8.1%, 8.1%, 7.1%, and 6.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil alkaline nitrogen content by 6.0% in Zhenjiang.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
soil alkaline nitrogen contente0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
6.0%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil alkaline nitrogen content averagely by 8.1%, 8.1%, 7.1%, and 6.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil available phosphorus content by 15.7%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
soil available phosphorus contente0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
15.7%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil available phosphorus content averagely by 15.7%, 12.1%, 19.6%, and 25.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil available phosphorus content by 12.1%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
soil available phosphorus contente0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
12.1%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil available phosphorus content averagely by 15.7%, 12.1%, 19.6%, and 25.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil available phosphorus content by 19.6%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
soil available phosphorus contente0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
19.6%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil available phosphorus content averagely by 15.7%, 12.1%, 19.6%, and 25.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil available phosphorus content by 25.8%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
soil available phosphorus contente0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
25.8%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil available phosphorus content averagely by 15.7%, 12.1%, 19.6%, and 25.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil available potassium content by 11.5%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
soil available potassium contente0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
11.5%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil available potassium content averagely by 11.5%, 7.6%, 7.6% , and 10.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil available potassium content by 7.6%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
soil available potassium contente0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
7.6%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil available potassium content averagely by 11.5%, 7.6%, 7.6% , and 10.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming decreased soil available potassium content by 10.1%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
soil available potassium contente0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
10.1%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil available potassium content averagely by 11.5%, 7.6%, 7.6% , and 10.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming increased wheat root dry mass at heading by 31. 5%.

Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Treatment
nighttime warminge0
Outcome
root dry masse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31. 5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nighttime warming increased the wheat root dry mass at heading stage in Shijiazhuang, Xuzhou, and Zhenjiang averagely by 31. 5% , 27.0%, and 14.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming increased wheat root dry mass at heading by 27.0%.

Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Treatment
nighttime warminge0
Outcome
root dry masse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nighttime warming increased the wheat root dry mass at heading stage in Shijiazhuang, Xuzhou, and Zhenjiang averagely by 31. 5% , 27.0%, and 14.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming increased wheat root dry mass at heading by 14.5%.

Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Treatment
nighttime warminge0
Outcome
root dry masse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nighttime warming increased the wheat root dry mass at heading stage in Shijiazhuang, Xuzhou, and Zhenjiang averagely by 31. 5% , 27.0%, and 14.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming increased wheat root/shoot ratio at heading by 23.8%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
23.8%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root/shoot ratio at heading stage in Shijiazhuang, Xuchang, and Zhenjiang averagely by 23.8%, 13.7% and 9.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1527 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime warming increased wheat root/shoot ratio at heading by 13.7%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
13.7%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root/shoot ratio at heading stage in Shijiazhuang, Xuchang, and Zhenjiang averagely by 23.8%, 13.7% and 9.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1527 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑

heat · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

heat · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 42 positive, 89 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.