Paper · 2013 · Ecological Research

Responses of a rice–wheat rotation agroecosystem to experimental warming

Hao Cheng; Wenwei Ren; Lele Ding; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Climate change is likely to affect agroecosystems in many ways. This study was performed to investigate how a rice–winter wheat rotation agroecosystem in southeast China would respond to global warming. By using an infrared heater system, the soil surface temperature was maintained about 1.5 °C above ambient milieu over 3 years. In the third growing season (2009–2010), the evapotranspiration (ET) rate, crop production, soil respiration, and soil carbon pool were monitored. The ET rate was 23 % higher in the warmed plot as compared to the control plot during the rice paddy growing season, and the rice grain yield was 16.3 % lower, but there was no significant difference in these parameters between the plots during the winter wheat‐growing season. The phenology of the winter wheat shifted under experimental warming, and ET may decrease late in the winter wheat‐growing season. Experimental warming significantly enhanced soil respiration, with mean annual soil respiration rates of 2.57 ± 0.17 and 1.96 ± 0.06 μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 observed in the warmed and control plots, respectively. After 3 years of warming, a significant decrease in the total organic carbon was observed, but only in the surface soil (0–5 cm). Warming also stimulated the belowground biomass, which may have compensated for any heat‐induced loss of soil organic carbon. Paddy rice seemed to be more vulnerable to warming than winter wheat in terms of water‐use efficiency and grain production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming increased rice-season evapotranspiration by 23%.

Treatment
warmed plote0
Outcome
ET ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
23 %e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ET rate was 23 % higher in the warmed plot as compared to the control plot during the rice paddy growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming reduced rice grain yield by 16.3%.

Treatment
experimental warmingt0
Outcome
rice grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
16.3 %e0
Comparator
control plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rice grain yield was 16.3 % lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“The ET rate was 23 % higher in the warmed plot as compared to the control plot during the rice paddy growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat rotation agroecosystem to experimental warming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice-season evapotranspiration and grain yield showed no significant plot difference in the winter wheat season.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
warmede1
Outcome
ET ratee1
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
control plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference in these parameters between the plots during the winter wheat‐growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–763 · show in text ↑
e1

“The ET rate was 23 % higher in the warmed plot as compared to the control plot during the rice paddy growing season, and the rice grain yield was 16.3 % lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming shifted winter wheat phenology.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
experimental warminge0
Outcome
phenologye0
Direction
shiftede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The phenology of the winter wheat shifted under experimental warming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–833 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat evapotranspiration may decrease late in the growing season.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
ETe0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
late in the winter wheat‐growing seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ET may decrease late in the winter wheat‐growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming significantly increased soil respiration.

Treatment
Experimental warminge0
Outcome
soil respiratione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
2.57 ± 0.17 and 1.96 ± 0.06 μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1e0
Qualifier
1.96 ± 0.06 μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1e0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experimental warming significantly enhanced soil respiration, with mean annual soil respiration rates of 2.57 ± 0.17 and 1.96 ± 0.06 μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 observed in the warmed and control plots, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three years of warming significantly decreased surface-soil organic carbon.

Treatment
3 years of warminge0
Outcome
total organic carbone0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
only in the surface soil (0–5 cm)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 3 years of warming, a significant decrease in the total organic carbon was observed, but only in the surface soil (0–5 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming stimulated belowground biomass.

Treatment
Warminge0
Outcome
belowground biomasse0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Warming also stimulated the belowground biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–25 · show in text ↑

heat · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

heat · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

heat · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 46 positive, 61 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

heat · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 42 positive, 89 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

heat · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 36 positive, 159 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.