Paper · 2021 · Food and Energy Security

A meta‐analysis of the effects of global warming on rice and wheat yields in a rice–wheat rotation system

Yongjin Zhou; Le Xu; Youzun Xu; et al.

11
claims
12
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The effects of global warming on crop production have received great attention in recent years. However, inconsistent results have been obtained with regard to major crops such as rice and wheat in rice–wheat rotation systems of China. Therefore, we undertook a comprehensive meta‐analysis of literature data. The yield response to warming differed for rice and wheat in the rice–wheat rotation system. Overall, warming significantly increased wheat yield (by 4.8%) but significantly reduced rice yield (by 14.8%). A number of factors were responsible for these observations. For example, rice yield responses varied with the temperature increase, variety and nitrogen (N) rate. Of these, N was the most important variable influencing yield responses to warming. The yield loss for rice was lower at temperature increases of 0.40–1.40°C and at a high N rate than that at temperature increases of 1.60–2.49°C and at a low N rate, respectively. The yield loss of indica rice was lower than that of japonica rice. For wheat, however, yield responses to warming varied with the warming regime, ambient temperature, temperature increases, and CO 2 concentrations. Of these factors, ambient temperature was the most important variable influencing yield in response to warming. Warming increased wheat yield at a mean growth season temperature ≤10°C, temperature increases of 0.80–1.50°C, and at ambient CO 2 concentrations. In addition, either daytime warming or nighttime warming significantly increased wheat yield. However, all‐day warming had no effect on wheat yields. We conclude that global warming will benefit wheat production but result in a serious loss of rice yield in rice–wheat rotations in China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming significantly increased wheat yield by 4.8%.

Treatment
warminge1
Outcome
wheat yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
4.8%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Overall, warming significantly increased wheat yield (by 4.8%) but significantly reduced rice yield (by 14.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming significantly reduced rice yield by 14.8%.

Treatment
warminge1
Outcome
rice yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Value
14.8%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Overall, warming significantly increased wheat yield (by 4.8%) but significantly reduced rice yield (by 14.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield loss under warming was lower at 0.40–1.40°C with a high N rate than at 1.60–2.49°C with a low N rate.

Treatment
a high N ratee2
Outcome
yield loss for ricee2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
a low N ratee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The yield loss for rice was lower at temperature increases of 0.40–1.40°C and at a high N rate than that at temperature increases of 1.60–2.49°C and at a low N rate, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–950 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield loss of indica rice under warming was lower than that of japonica rice.

Material
indica ricee3
Outcome
yield losse3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
japonica ricee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The yield loss of indica rice was lower than that of japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming increased wheat yield at a mean growth season temperature of 10 °C or below.

Treatment
Warminge4
Outcome
wheat yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
at a mean growth season temperature ≤10°Ce4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Warming increased wheat yield at a mean growth season temperature ≤10°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Daytime or nighttime warming significantly increased wheat yield.

Treatment
daytime warming or nighttime warminge5
Outcome
wheat yielde5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“either daytime warming or nighttime warming significantly increased wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All-day warming had no effect on wheat yields.

Treatment
all‐day warminge6
Outcome
wheat yieldse6
Direction
no effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“all‐day warming had no effect on wheat yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1575 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Global warming will benefit wheat production in China.

Treatment
global warminge7
Outcome
wheat productione7
Direction
benefite7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“We conclude that global warming will benefit wheat production but result in a serious loss of rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1681 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Global warming will result in a serious loss of rice yield in China.

Treatment
global warminge7
Outcome
rice yielde7
Direction
losse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“We conclude that global warming will benefit wheat production but result in a serious loss of rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1681 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate was the most important variable influencing rice yield responses to warming.

Treatment
nitrogen (N) ratee1
Outcome
yield responses to warminge1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rice yield responses varied with the temperature increase, variety and nitrogen (N) rate. Of these, N was the most important variable influencing yield responses to warming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–770 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambient temperature was the most important variable influencing wheat yield responses to warming.

Treatment
ambient temperaturee2
Outcome
yield in response to warminge2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“For wheat, however, yield responses to warming varied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1073 · show in text ↑
e2

“Of these factors, ambient temperature was the most important variable influencing yield in response to warming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1278 · show in text ↑

heat · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 36 positive, 159 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

heat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

309 papers: 54 positive, 255 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 255 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

305 papers more in this group

See all 309 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.