Abstract
A deeper understanding of the effects of experimental warming and elevated ozone (O3) concentration on carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes is imperative for reducing potential CO2 emissions in agroecosystems, but are less understood particularly in rotational wheat (Triticum aestivum)—soybean (Glycine max) croplands. In order to understand such effects on CO2 fluxes from winter wheat-soybean rotation, a field experiment was conducted by using the open-top chamber (OTCs) during the growing seasons of 2012 and 2013 at an agro-ecological station in southeast China. The experimental treatments included the control (CK), experimental warming (T, crop canopy temperature increased by ~2 °C), elevated O3 concentration (O, O3 concentration about 100 ppb) along with temperature enhancement (OT, elevated ~2 °C temperature plus 100 ppb O3). The results showed that warming significantly increased the mean CO2 fluxes (MCF) and the cumulative amount of CO2 (CAC) from soil and soil-crop systems, while elevated O3 and warming enhancement (OT) significantly reduced MCF and CAC. Besides, warming significantly reduced the biomass of winter-wheat, but it insignificantly decreased the biomass of soybean in the harvest period. The O and OT treatments significantly reduced the biomass of winter-wheat and soybean cropping systems in the harvest time. Both warming and elevated O3 concentration decreased the temperature sensitivity coefficients (Q10) in soil respiration during the experimental period. Overall, our results indicate that elevated O3 concentration compensates the effect of warming on CO2 emission to some extents, which has a positive feedback impact on the climate system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Warming significantly increased mean CO2 fluxes from soil and soil crop systems.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- warminge0
- Outcome
- mean CO2 fluxes (MCF)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control (CK)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“warming significantly increased the mean CO2 fluxes (MCF) and the cumulative amount of CO2 (CAC) from soil and soil-crop systems”
e1“control (CK)”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Warming significantly increased cumulative CO2 from soil and soil crop systems.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- warminge0
- Outcome
- cumulative amount of CO2 (CAC)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control (CK)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“warming significantly increased the mean CO2 fluxes (MCF) and the cumulative amount of CO2 (CAC) from soil and soil-crop systems”
e1“control (CK)”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Ozone plus warming significantly reduced mean CO2 fluxes.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- elevated O3 and warming enhancement (OT)e0
- Outcome
- MCFe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- control (CK)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“elevated O3 and warming enhancement (OT) significantly reduced MCF and CAC.”
e1“control (CK)”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Ozone plus warming significantly reduced cumulative CO2.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- elevated O3 and warming enhancement (OT)e0
- Outcome
- CACe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- control (CK)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“elevated O3 and warming enhancement (OT) significantly reduced MCF and CAC.”
e1“control (CK)”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Warming significantly reduced winter wheat biomass at harvest.
- Taxon
- winter-wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- warminge0
- Outcome
- biomass of winter-wheate0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- control (CK)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“warming significantly reduced the biomass of winter-wheat”
e1“control (CK)”
Claim · model-written summary
Warming reduced soybean biomass at harvest without significance.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Organ / stage
- harvest periode0
- Treatment
- warminge1
- Outcome
- biomass of soybeane0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- control (CK)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“it insignificantly decreased the biomass of soybean in the harvest period.”
e1“warming significantly reduced the biomass of winter-wheat”
e2“control (CK)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ozone treatment significantly reduced winter wheat biomass at harvest.
- Taxon
- winter-wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Oe0
- Outcome
- biomass of winter-wheate0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- control (CK)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The O and OT treatments significantly reduced the biomass of winter-wheat and soybean cropping systems in the harvest time.”
e1“control (CK)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined ozone and warming significantly reduced soybean biomass at harvest.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- OTe0
- Outcome
- biomass of winter-wheat and soybean cropping systemse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- control (CK)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The O and OT treatments significantly reduced the biomass of winter-wheat and soybean cropping systems in the harvest time.”
e1“control (CK)”
Claim · model-written summary
Warming decreased soil respiration temperature sensitivity.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- warminge0
- Outcome
- temperature sensitivity coefficients (Q10) in soil respiratione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- control (CK)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Both warming and elevated O3 concentration decreased the temperature sensitivity coefficients (Q10) in soil respiration during the experimental period.”
e1“control (CK)”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Elevated ozone decreased soil respiration temperature sensitivity.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- elevated O3 concentratione0
- Outcome
- temperature sensitivity coefficients (Q10) in soil respiratione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- control (CK)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Both warming and elevated O3 concentration decreased the temperature sensitivity coefficients (Q10) in soil respiration during the experimental period.”
e1“control (CK)”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
ozone · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →heat · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
38 papers more in this group
See all 42 papers →ozone · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
heat · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
heat · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
127 papers more in this group
See all 131 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.