Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Effect of Warming and Elevated O3 Concentration on CO2 Emissions in a Wheat-Soybean Rotation Cropland

Yuanyuan Wang; Zhenghua Hu; A. R. M. Towfiqul Islam; et al.

10
claims
27
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A deeper understanding of the effects of experimental warming and elevated ozone (O3) concentration on carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes is imperative for reducing potential CO2 emissions in agroecosystems, but are less understood particularly in rotational wheat (Triticum aestivum)—soybean (Glycine max) croplands. In order to understand such effects on CO2 fluxes from winter wheat-soybean rotation, a field experiment was conducted by using the open-top chamber (OTCs) during the growing seasons of 2012 and 2013 at an agro-ecological station in southeast China. The experimental treatments included the control (CK), experimental warming (T, crop canopy temperature increased by ~2 °C), elevated O3 concentration (O, O3 concentration about 100 ppb) along with temperature enhancement (OT, elevated ~2 °C temperature plus 100 ppb O3). The results showed that warming significantly increased the mean CO2 fluxes (MCF) and the cumulative amount of CO2 (CAC) from soil and soil-crop systems, while elevated O3 and warming enhancement (OT) significantly reduced MCF and CAC. Besides, warming significantly reduced the biomass of winter-wheat, but it insignificantly decreased the biomass of soybean in the harvest period. The O and OT treatments significantly reduced the biomass of winter-wheat and soybean cropping systems in the harvest time. Both warming and elevated O3 concentration decreased the temperature sensitivity coefficients (Q10) in soil respiration during the experimental period. Overall, our results indicate that elevated O3 concentration compensates the effect of warming on CO2 emission to some extents, which has a positive feedback impact on the climate system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming significantly increased mean CO2 fluxes from soil and soil crop systems.

Treatment
warminge0
Outcome
mean CO2 fluxes (MCF)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“warming significantly increased the mean CO2 fluxes (MCF) and the cumulative amount of CO2 (CAC) from soil and soil-crop systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming significantly increased cumulative CO2 from soil and soil crop systems.

Treatment
warminge0
Outcome
cumulative amount of CO2 (CAC)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“warming significantly increased the mean CO2 fluxes (MCF) and the cumulative amount of CO2 (CAC) from soil and soil-crop systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone plus warming significantly reduced mean CO2 fluxes.

Treatment
elevated O3 and warming enhancement (OT)e0
Outcome
MCFe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated O3 and warming enhancement (OT) significantly reduced MCF and CAC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1068 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone plus warming significantly reduced cumulative CO2.

Treatment
elevated O3 and warming enhancement (OT)e0
Outcome
CACe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated O3 and warming enhancement (OT) significantly reduced MCF and CAC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1068 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming significantly reduced winter wheat biomass at harvest.

Taxon
winter-wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
warminge0
Outcome
biomass of winter-wheate0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“warming significantly reduced the biomass of winter-wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1135 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming reduced soybean biomass at harvest without significance.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Organ / stage
harvest periode0
Treatment
warminge1
Outcome
biomass of soybeane0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control (CK)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it insignificantly decreased the biomass of soybean in the harvest period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1215 · show in text ↑
e1

“warming significantly reduced the biomass of winter-wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1135 · show in text ↑
e2

“control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone treatment significantly reduced winter wheat biomass at harvest.

Taxon
winter-wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Oe0
Outcome
biomass of winter-wheate0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The O and OT treatments significantly reduced the biomass of winter-wheat and soybean cropping systems in the harvest time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1339 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined ozone and warming significantly reduced soybean biomass at harvest.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
OTe0
Outcome
biomass of winter-wheat and soybean cropping systemse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The O and OT treatments significantly reduced the biomass of winter-wheat and soybean cropping systems in the harvest time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1339 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming decreased soil respiration temperature sensitivity.

Treatment
warminge0
Outcome
temperature sensitivity coefficients (Q10) in soil respiratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both warming and elevated O3 concentration decreased the temperature sensitivity coefficients (Q10) in soil respiration during the experimental period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1491 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated ozone decreased soil respiration temperature sensitivity.

Treatment
elevated O3 concentratione0
Outcome
temperature sensitivity coefficients (Q10) in soil respiratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both warming and elevated O3 concentration decreased the temperature sensitivity coefficients (Q10) in soil respiration during the experimental period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1491 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑

ozone · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

26 papers: 3 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

heat · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

42 papers: 10 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

ozone · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

heat · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

heat · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 42 positive, 89 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.