Paper · 2002 · PubMed

Cryopreservation of tea (Camellia sinensis L.) seeds and embryonic axes.

Haeng-Hoon Kim; Young-Soon Cha; Hyung-Jin Baek; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study investigated the tolerance to desiccation and freezing of tea seeds, embryonic axes (EAs) and cotyledonary embryonic axes (CEAs, consisting of EAs with portions of cotyledons still attached). No seeds germinated after desiccation and cryopreservation. EAs extracted from seeds desiccated to 18.9% moisture content (fresh weight basis) and cryopreserved showed 20.7% survival but plantlet production from these EAs was impossible. When EAs and CEAs were extracted from seeds before being submitted to desiccation and freezing, survival of control and frozen samples was equivalent with both types of materials. However, plantlet production was significantly higher from control and cryopreserved CEAs than EAs. The maturity stage of the seeds from which CEAs were extracted had an important effect on their survival and plant production percentages, mature seeds providing better results than early mature and late mature seeds. The highest percentages of plantlet production from cryopreserved CEAs, which ranged between 75.1 and 80.4%, were achieved for EA moisture contents between 21.5 and 15.0%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tea seeds germinated after desiccation and cryopreservation.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
desiccation and cryopreservatione0
Outcome
No seeds germinatede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“tea (Camellia sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“No seeds germinated after desiccation and cryopreservation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Embryonic axes from seeds desiccated to 18.9% moisture content and cryopreserved had 20.7% survival.

Taxon
teat0
Organ / stage
EAse0
Treatment
desiccated to 18.9% moisture content (fresh weight basis) and cryopreservede0
Outcome
survivale0
Value
20.7%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“tea (Camellia sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“EAs extracted from seeds desiccated to 18.9% moisture content (fresh weight basis) and cryopreserved showed 20.7% survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those cryopreserved embryonic axes could not produce plantlets.

Taxon
teat0
Organ / stage
EAse0
Outcome
plantlet production from these EAs was impossiblee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“tea (Camellia sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“plantlet production from these EAs was impossible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For axes extracted before treatment, frozen and control samples survived equivalently for both EAs and CEAs.

Taxon
teat0
Organ / stage
EAs and CEAse0
Treatment
frozen samplese0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“tea (Camellia sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“When EAs and CEAs were extracted from seeds before being submitted to desiccation and freezing, survival of control and frozen samples was equivalent with both types of materials.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–620 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Control CEAs produced significantly more plantlets than control EAs.

Taxon
teat0
Organ / stage
CEAse0
Outcome
plantlet productione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
controle0
Comparator
EAse0

Verbatim

t0

“tea (Camellia sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“plantlet production was significantly higher from control and cryopreserved CEAs than EAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–719 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cryopreserved CEAs produced significantly more plantlets than cryopreserved EAs.

Taxon
teat0
Organ / stage
CEAse0
Outcome
plantlet productione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
cryopreservede0
Comparator
EAse0

Verbatim

t0

“tea (Camellia sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“plantlet production was significantly higher from control and cryopreserved CEAs than EAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–719 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CEAs from mature seeds survived better than those from early or late mature seeds.

Taxon
teat0
Organ / stage
mature seedse0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
early mature and late mature seedse0

Verbatim

t0

“tea (Camellia sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maturity stage of the seeds from which CEAs were extracted had an important effect on their survival and plant production percentages, mature seeds providing better results than early mature and late mature seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–938 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CEAs from mature seeds produced more plants than those from early or late mature seeds.

Taxon
teat0
Organ / stage
mature seedse0
Outcome
plant production percentagese0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
early mature and late mature seedse0

Verbatim

t0

“tea (Camellia sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maturity stage of the seeds from which CEAs were extracted had an important effect on their survival and plant production percentages, mature seeds providing better results than early mature and late mature seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–938 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cryopreserved CEAs reached 75.1 to 80.4% plantlet production at EA moisture contents of 21.5 to 15.0%.

Taxon
teat0
Organ / stage
CEAse0
Outcome
plantlet productione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
75.1 and 80.4%e0
Qualifier
EA moisture contents between 21.5 and 15.0%e0

Verbatim

t0

“tea (Camellia sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest percentages of plantlet production from cryopreserved CEAs, which ranged between 75.1 and 80.4%, were achieved for EA moisture contents between 21.5 and 15.0%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1110 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

drought · growth · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.