Paper · 2016 · Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition

Performance of Quality Protein Maize Under Different Planting Windows

Rakesh Kumar; Sourabh Kumar; Ashutosh; et al.

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Forage Research Block, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal during post rainy season of 2014 and 2015 to study the performance of quality protein maize (QPM) cultivars under different planting windows. The treatments consisted of four sowing times viz., Aug. 15, Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15 in main plots and five maize cultivars HQPM-1, HQPM-4, HM-10, African tall and J-1006 in subplots in a split plot design. August 15 sowing recorded the maximum plant height, leaf length, leaf width, number of leaves per plant, green fodder yield (53.49 and 56.17 t/ha) and DM yield (11.39 and 12.03 t/ha) during 2014 and 2015, respectively. The performance of Aug. 15 sown maize in post monsoon season was at par with Sept. 5 sowing, however, further delay in sowing led to a significant (P<0.05) reduction in growth parameters and fodder yield. October 15 sown crop showed reduction (P<0.05) in these growth parameters. The maximum yield was obtained in African tall and the cultivars J-1006, HQPM-1 and HQPM-4 were at par with African tall while HM-10 gave the lowest yield. The levels of CP and NDF were influenced (P<0.05) by planting windows and CP contain increased and NDF decreased with delay in sowing, however, no significant variation in quality parameters was found among the QPM and normal fodder maize cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

August 15 sowing gave the maximum plant height, leaf length and leaf width compared with later sowing.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
August 15 sowinge2
Outcome
plant height, leaf length, leaf widthe2
Direction
maximume2
Comparator
Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“four sowing times viz., Aug. 15, Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“August 15 sowing recorded the maximum plant height, leaf length, leaf width, number of leaves per plant, green fodder yield (53.49 and 56.17 t/ha) and DM yield (11.39 and 12.03 t/ha) during 2014 and 2015, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

August 15 sowing gave the maximum number of leaves per plant.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
August 15 sowinge2
Outcome
number of leaves per plante2
Direction
maximume2
Comparator
Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“four sowing times viz., Aug. 15, Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“August 15 sowing recorded the maximum plant height, leaf length, leaf width, number of leaves per plant, green fodder yield (53.49 and 56.17 t/ha) and DM yield (11.39 and 12.03 t/ha) during 2014 and 2015, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

August 15 sowing gave the maximum green fodder yield (53.49 and 56.17 t/ha in 2014 and 2015).

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
August 15 sowinge2
Outcome
green fodder yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Value
53.49 and 56.17 t/hae2
Comparator
Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“four sowing times viz., Aug. 15, Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“August 15 sowing recorded the maximum plant height, leaf length, leaf width, number of leaves per plant, green fodder yield (53.49 and 56.17 t/ha) and DM yield (11.39 and 12.03 t/ha) during 2014 and 2015, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

August 15 sowing gave the maximum DM yield (11.39 and 12.03 t/ha in 2014 and 2015).

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
August 15 sowinge2
Outcome
DM yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Value
11.39 and 12.03 t/hae2
Comparator
Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“four sowing times viz., Aug. 15, Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“August 15 sowing recorded the maximum plant height, leaf length, leaf width, number of leaves per plant, green fodder yield (53.49 and 56.17 t/ha) and DM yield (11.39 and 12.03 t/ha) during 2014 and 2015, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aug. 15 sowing was at par with Sept. 5 sowing in performance in the post-monsoon season.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Aug. 15 sowne3
Outcome
performancee3
Direction
at pare3
Comparator
Sept. 5 sowinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e3

“The performance of Aug. 15 sown maize in post monsoon season was at par with Sept. 5 sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Further delay in sowing significantly reduced growth parameters and fodder yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
further delay in sowinge4
Outcome
growth parameters and fodder yielde4
Direction
reductione4
Qualifier
P<0.05e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e4

“further delay in sowing led to a significant (P<0.05) reduction in growth parameters and fodder yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

October 15 sowing significantly reduced growth parameters.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
October 15 sowne5
Outcome
growth parameterse5
Direction
reductione5
Qualifier
P<0.05e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e5

“October 15 sown crop showed reduction (P<0.05) in these growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–929 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

African tall gave the maximum yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
African talle6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
maximume6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e6

“The maximum yield was obtained in African tall and the cultivars J-1006, HQPM-1 and HQPM-4 were at par with African tall while HM-10 gave the lowest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1085 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars J-1006, HQPM-1 and HQPM-4 were at par with African tall in yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
J-1006, HQPM-1 and HQPM-4e6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
at pare6
Comparator
African talle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e6

“The maximum yield was obtained in African tall and the cultivars J-1006, HQPM-1 and HQPM-4 were at par with African tall while HM-10 gave the lowest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1085 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HM-10 gave the lowest yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
HM-10e6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
loweste6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e6

“The maximum yield was obtained in African tall and the cultivars J-1006, HQPM-1 and HQPM-4 were at par with African tall while HM-10 gave the lowest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CP increased with delay in sowing, a significant effect of planting windows.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
delay in sowinge7
Outcome
CPe7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
P<0.05e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e7

“The levels of CP and NDF were influenced (P<0.05) by planting windows and CP contain increased and NDF decreased with delay in sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NDF decreased with delay in sowing, a significant effect of planting windows.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
delay in sowinge7
Outcome
NDFe7
Direction
decreasede7
Qualifier
P<0.05e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e7

“The levels of CP and NDF were influenced (P<0.05) by planting windows and CP contain increased and NDF decreased with delay in sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1220 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant variation in quality parameters was found among QPM and normal fodder maize cultivars.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
QPM and normal fodder maize cultivarse7
Outcome
quality parameterse7
Direction
no significant variatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e7

“no significant variation in quality parameters was found among the QPM and normal fodder maize cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1335 · show in text ↑

sowing time · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

sowing time · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

269 papers: 178 positive, 91 negative or no effect

90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 178 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

265 papers more in this group

See all 269 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.