Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Forage Research Block, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal during post rainy season of 2014 and 2015 to study the performance of quality protein maize (QPM) cultivars under different planting windows. The treatments consisted of four sowing times viz., Aug. 15, Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15 in main plots and five maize cultivars HQPM-1, HQPM-4, HM-10, African tall and J-1006 in subplots in a split plot design. August 15 sowing recorded the maximum plant height, leaf length, leaf width, number of leaves per plant, green fodder yield (53.49 and 56.17 t/ha) and DM yield (11.39 and 12.03 t/ha) during 2014 and 2015, respectively. The performance of Aug. 15 sown maize in post monsoon season was at par with Sept. 5 sowing, however, further delay in sowing led to a significant (P<0.05) reduction in growth parameters and fodder yield. October 15 sown crop showed reduction (P<0.05) in these growth parameters. The maximum yield was obtained in African tall and the cultivars J-1006, HQPM-1 and HQPM-4 were at par with African tall while HM-10 gave the lowest yield. The levels of CP and NDF were influenced (P<0.05) by planting windows and CP contain increased and NDF decreased with delay in sowing, however, no significant variation in quality parameters was found among the QPM and normal fodder maize cultivars.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
August 15 sowing gave the maximum plant height, leaf length and leaf width compared with later sowing.
- Treatment
- August 15 sowinge2
- Outcome
- plant height, leaf length, leaf widthe2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Comparator
- Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Quality Protein Maize”
e1“four sowing times viz., Aug. 15, Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15”
e2“August 15 sowing recorded the maximum plant height, leaf length, leaf width, number of leaves per plant, green fodder yield (53.49 and 56.17 t/ha) and DM yield (11.39 and 12.03 t/ha) during 2014 and 2015, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
August 15 sowing gave the maximum number of leaves per plant.
- Treatment
- August 15 sowinge2
- Outcome
- number of leaves per plante2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Comparator
- Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Quality Protein Maize”
e1“four sowing times viz., Aug. 15, Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15”
e2“August 15 sowing recorded the maximum plant height, leaf length, leaf width, number of leaves per plant, green fodder yield (53.49 and 56.17 t/ha) and DM yield (11.39 and 12.03 t/ha) during 2014 and 2015, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
August 15 sowing gave the maximum green fodder yield (53.49 and 56.17 t/ha in 2014 and 2015).
- Treatment
- August 15 sowinge2
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 53.49 and 56.17 t/hae2
- Comparator
- Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Quality Protein Maize”
e1“four sowing times viz., Aug. 15, Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15”
e2“August 15 sowing recorded the maximum plant height, leaf length, leaf width, number of leaves per plant, green fodder yield (53.49 and 56.17 t/ha) and DM yield (11.39 and 12.03 t/ha) during 2014 and 2015, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
August 15 sowing gave the maximum DM yield (11.39 and 12.03 t/ha in 2014 and 2015).
- Treatment
- August 15 sowinge2
- Outcome
- DM yielde2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 11.39 and 12.03 t/hae2
- Comparator
- Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Quality Protein Maize”
e1“four sowing times viz., Aug. 15, Sept. 5, Sept. 25 and Oct. 15”
e2“August 15 sowing recorded the maximum plant height, leaf length, leaf width, number of leaves per plant, green fodder yield (53.49 and 56.17 t/ha) and DM yield (11.39 and 12.03 t/ha) during 2014 and 2015, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Aug. 15 sowing was at par with Sept. 5 sowing in performance in the post-monsoon season.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Quality Protein Maize”
e3“The performance of Aug. 15 sown maize in post monsoon season was at par with Sept. 5 sowing”
Claim · model-written summary
Further delay in sowing significantly reduced growth parameters and fodder yield.
- Treatment
- further delay in sowinge4
- Outcome
- growth parameters and fodder yielde4
- Direction
- reductione4
- Qualifier
- P<0.05e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Quality Protein Maize”
e4“further delay in sowing led to a significant (P<0.05) reduction in growth parameters and fodder yield”
Claim · model-written summary
October 15 sowing significantly reduced growth parameters.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Quality Protein Maize”
e5“October 15 sown crop showed reduction (P<0.05) in these growth parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
African tall gave the maximum yield.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Quality Protein Maize”
e6“The maximum yield was obtained in African tall and the cultivars J-1006, HQPM-1 and HQPM-4 were at par with African tall while HM-10 gave the lowest yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivars J-1006, HQPM-1 and HQPM-4 were at par with African tall in yield.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Quality Protein Maize”
e6“The maximum yield was obtained in African tall and the cultivars J-1006, HQPM-1 and HQPM-4 were at par with African tall while HM-10 gave the lowest yield”
Claim · model-written summary
HM-10 gave the lowest yield.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Quality Protein Maize”
e6“The maximum yield was obtained in African tall and the cultivars J-1006, HQPM-1 and HQPM-4 were at par with African tall while HM-10 gave the lowest yield”
Claim · model-written summary
CP increased with delay in sowing, a significant effect of planting windows.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Quality Protein Maize”
e7“The levels of CP and NDF were influenced (P<0.05) by planting windows and CP contain increased and NDF decreased with delay in sowing”
Claim · model-written summary
NDF decreased with delay in sowing, a significant effect of planting windows.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Quality Protein Maize”
e7“The levels of CP and NDF were influenced (P<0.05) by planting windows and CP contain increased and NDF decreased with delay in sowing”
Claim · model-written summary
No significant variation in quality parameters was found among QPM and normal fodder maize cultivars.
- Material
- QPM and normal fodder maize cultivarse7
- Outcome
- quality parameterse7
- Direction
- no significant variatione7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Quality Protein Maize”
e7“no significant variation in quality parameters was found among the QPM and normal fodder maize cultivars”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →sowing time · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 178 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
265 papers more in this group
See all 269 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.