Paper · 2016 · Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista)

Selenium and sulfur: mitigation in plant stresses

Leonardo W. Lima

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Plants do not have specific defense mechanisms to counteract the diverse range of abiotic stresses and pollutants into the environment, and its survival depends on the flexibility and adaptability of its own natural defense mechanisms. Furthermore, the maintenance of cellular homeostasis depends on several interlinked and complex mechanisms, while the cellular defense system does not follow a specific pattern of action and may differ due to various factors such as plant species, exposure time to the stress, plant developmental stage, different organs and tissues analyzed. In the light of these considerations, this dissertation aimed to highlight and investigate the role of Sulfur and Selenium against different plant stresses, through the enzymatic and non-enzymatic plant responses and other related defense mechanisms. In the first chapter the author characterize the general biochemical mechanisms of the antioxidant cell defense, specifically the reactive oxygen species (EROs) formation and its chemical singularities and the induced oxidative stress, the enzymatic antioxidant defense system, specifically the superoxide dismutase (SOD) and Catalase (CAT) enzymes, the non-enzymatic mechanisms against the stress, including the Ascorbate-Glutathione cycle, the GSH (reduced glutathione), the phytochelatins and also proline formation. The plant nutritional status during the stress is crucial in order to maintain a proper defense response. In view of this, the chapter two is a published review about the participation of Sulfur (S) on the stress defense. This nutrient has a role in fundamental processes such as electron transport, structure, regulation and it is also associated with photosynthetic oxygen production, abiotic and biotic stress resistance and secondary metabolism. Moreover, few chemical elements are considered benefic to plants, while Selenium (Se) is the most relevant. In the chapter three the author describes the role of Se to detoxify the stress induced by heavy metal contamination, its powerful antioxidant characteristics and the improvement of the antioxidant enzymes activity and overall defense mechanisms. The chapter four consists of a scientific project conducted by the author. The aim of this study was to investigate whether Selenium, under the form of selenite (Na2SeO3), may avoid the uptake, translocation and concentration of Cadmium (CdCl2), in different tomato tissues, indicating possible mechanisms to counteract the stress, as well as to analyze the fruits overall status through the nutritional analyses, dry weight, pigments and proline concentration. The results demonstrate that alleviating effect of Se in tomato under Cd contamination could be related to restriction of Cd2+ uptake and translocation, enhancing micronutrient concentration in fruits and, finally, enhancing fruit proline concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium may alleviate cadmium stress in tomato by restricting Cd2+ uptake and translocation.

Treatment
See1
Compound
Cd2+e1
Outcome
alleviating effecte1
Qualifier
restriction of Cd2+ uptake and translocatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“alleviating effect of Se in tomato under Cd contamination could be related to restriction of Cd2+ uptake and translocation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2646–2768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium under cadmium contamination enhanced micronutrient concentration in tomato fruits.

Organ / stage
fruitse2
Treatment
See1
Outcome
micronutrient concentratione2
Direction
enhancinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“alleviating effect of Se in tomato under Cd contamination could be related to restriction of Cd2+ uptake and translocation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2646–2768 · show in text ↑
e2

“enhancing micronutrient concentration in fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2770–2817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenium under cadmium contamination enhanced proline concentration in tomato fruit.

Organ / stage
fruite3
Treatment
See1
Outcome
proline concentratione3
Direction
enhancinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“alleviating effect of Se in tomato under Cd contamination could be related to restriction of Cd2+ uptake and translocation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2646–2768 · show in text ↑
e3

“enhancing fruit proline concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2832–2869 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

selenium atom · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.