Abstract
This experiment was conducted in 1999 and 2000 in a field naturally infected by Phytophthora capsici to determine the effects of different irrigation methods, namely, basin (B), closed-end furrow (F), drip (D) and sprinkler (S) irrigation on dry yield of chili pepper (Capsium annuum L. K. Maras Type). Water use efficiency (WUE) and plant mortality were also measured. The averages of total applied water to the B, F, D and S plots for the two years were 937.7 mm, 920.6 mm, 886.5 and 913.4 mm, respectively. Thus, the mean seasonal water use by pepper varied from 1020.7 to 1109.7 mm. The highest water use was measured in B, followed by use for S, D and F methods. The highest mean potential dry yield with 1.58 t ha(-1) was obtained using D method. This was followed by S (1.36 t ha(-1)), B (1.13 t ha(-1)), and F (0.81 t ha(-1)) methods. In terms of plant mortality, crops having B irrigation had the highest (93.9%), followed by lessen amount to the S (3.2%), F (3.1%), and D methods (1.7%). Only the B irrigation method stimulated the development of P. capsici disease. On the other hand, mean WUEs varied between 0.7 and 1.7 kg ha(-1)mnm(-1) for Irrigation methods. WUE for D method was slightly higher than S method, but considerably higher than B and F methods.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Basin plots received the most applied water.
CapsicumNot reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The averages of total applied water to the B, F, D and S plots for the two years were 937.7 mm, 920.6 mm, 886.5 and 913.4 mm, respectively.”
e1“chili pepper (Capsium annuum L. K. Maras Type)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean seasonal pepper water use ranged from 1020.7 to 1109.7 mm.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“the mean seasonal water use by pepper varied from 1020.7 to 1109.7 mm.”
Claim · model-written summary
Basin irrigation had the highest pepper water use, followed by sprinkler, drip and furrow.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest water use was measured in B, followed by use for S, D and F methods.”
e1“chili pepper (Capsium annuum L. K. Maras Type)”
e2“basin (B), closed-end furrow (F), drip (D) and sprinkler (S) irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation produced the highest mean potential dry yield of 1.58 t ha(-1).
- Treatment
- drip (D)e2
- Outcome
- mean potential dry yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.58 t ha(-1)e0
- Comparator
- sprinkler (S) irrigatione2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest mean potential dry yield with 1.58 t ha(-1) was obtained using D method. This was followed by S (1.36 t ha(-1)), B (1.13 t ha(-1)), and F (0.81 t ha(-1)) methods.”
e1“chili pepper (Capsium annuum L. K. Maras Type)”
e2“drip (D) and sprinkler (S) irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Basin irrigation had the highest plant mortality at 93.9%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“crops having B irrigation had the highest (93.9%), followed by lessen amount to the S (3.2%), F (3.1%), and D methods (1.7%).”
e1“In terms of plant mortality”
e2“basin (B), closed-end furrow (F), drip (D) and sprinkler (S) irrigation”
e3“chili pepper (Capsium annuum L. K. Maras Type)”
Claim · model-written summary
Only basin irrigation stimulated P. capsici disease development.
- Treatment
- basin (B)e1
- Interactor
- P. capsici
.jpg?width=60)
Phytophthora capsicie0pathogen - Outcome
- development of P. capsici diseasee0
- Direction
- stimulatede0
- Comparator
- drip (D)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Only the B irrigation method stimulated the development of P. capsici disease.”
e1“basin (B), closed-end furrow (F), drip (D) and sprinkler (S) irrigation”
e2“chili pepper (Capsium annuum L. K. Maras Type)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean water use efficiency varied from 0.7 to 1.7 kg ha(-1)mnm(-1) among irrigation methods.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mean WUEs varied between 0.7 and 1.7 kg ha(-1)mnm(-1) for Irrigation methods.”
e1“chili pepper (Capsium annuum L. K. Maras Type)”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation had higher water use efficiency than sprinkler, basin and furrow irrigation.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“WUE for D method was slightly higher than S method, but considerably higher than B and F methods.”
e1“drip (D) and sprinkler (S) irrigation”
e2“chili pepper (Capsium annuum L. K. Maras Type)”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.