Paper · 2015 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Effect of Fertilizer Levels and Foilar Application on Morphological Characters, Nutrient Content and Yield of Cotton

A. N. Deshpande; R. S. Masram; B. M. Kamble

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment on effect of fertilizer levels and foliar application on morphophysiological, nutrient content, reddening and yield of cotton on Vertisol" was conducted at Cotton Improvement Project, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India during May to September, 2008-09. The experiment was laid out in a factorial randomized block design with three replications and two main treatments i.e. hybrid Bt RCH-2 and Non-Bt RCH-2 and nine sub treatments with different fertilizer doses i.e. 50% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), 75% RDF, 100% RDF, 125% RDF, 150% RDF, 100% RDF+2% DAP spray, 100% RDF+1% MgSO 4 and 100% RDF+1% KNO 3 . The non-Bt cotton hybrid showed pronounced effect on growth parameters than Bt cotton hybrid. The treatment 100% RDF at square and flowering recorded significant effects on biochemical parameters (Chlorophyll N, P, K, Mg and Fe content), which was maximum in non-Bt hybrid as compared to Bt cotton hybrid. At boll development stage, treatment 100% RDF+1% MgSO 4 was found to be the best for highest chlorophyll content in non-Bt than Bt cotton. The nutrient concentration in leaf was higher at square formation and goes on reducing as plant growth proceeded. The application 100% RDF along with three foliar sprays of 1% KNO 3 or 1% MgSO 4 or 2% DAP was found minimum intensity of reddening of leaves and increased yield of cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-Bt cotton had more pronounced growth parameters than Bt cotton.

Material
non-Bt cotton hybride0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
pronouncede0
Comparator
Bt cotton hybride0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The non-Bt cotton hybrid showed pronounced effect on growth parameters than Bt cotton hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At square and flowering, 100% RDF significantly affected chlorophyll and nutrient content, maximal in non-Bt cotton.

Organ / stage
square and floweringe0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
Chlorophyll N, P, K, Mg and Fe contente0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
Bt cotton hybride0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“The treatment 100% RDF at square and flowering recorded significant effects on biochemical parameters (Chlorophyll N, P, K, Mg and Fe content), which was maximum in non-Bt hybrid as compared to Bt cotton hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At boll development, 100% RDF plus MgSO 4 gave highest chlorophyll in non-Bt cotton versus Bt.

Organ / stage
boll development stagee0
Treatment
100% RDF+1% MgSO 4e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Bt cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“At boll development stage, treatment 100% RDF+1% MgSO 4 was found to be the best for highest chlorophyll content in non-Bt than Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nutrient concentration was higher at square formation and decreased with growth.

Organ / stage
square formatione0
Outcome
nutrient concentration in leafe0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“The nutrient concentration in leaf was higher at square formation and goes on reducing as plant growth proceeded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1215 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer with foliar sprays minimized leaf reddening.

Treatment
100% RDF along with three foliar sprays of 1% KNO 3 or 1% MgSO 4 or 2% DAPe0
Outcome
intensity of reddening of leavese0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application 100% RDF along with three foliar sprays of 1% KNO 3 or 1% MgSO 4 or 2% DAP was found minimum intensity of reddening of leaves and increased yield of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer with foliar sprays increased cotton yield.

Treatment
100% RDF along with three foliar sprays of 1% KNO 3 or 1% MgSO 4 or 2% DAPe0
Outcome
yield of cottone0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application 100% RDF along with three foliar sprays of 1% KNO 3 or 1% MgSO 4 or 2% DAP was found minimum intensity of reddening of leaves and increased yield of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1388 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.