Paper · 2015 · AN ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE

Effect of FYM, biofertilizers and zinc on phosphorus uptake by maize

R.S. FAUJDAR; MAHENDRA SHARMA

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of FYM, biofertilizers (Azotobacter and VAM) and zinc on phosphorus uptake by maize during two consecutive years of 2006-07 and 2007-08 at Instructional Farm, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur. Application of FYM, biofertilizers and zinc significantly increased phosphorus uptake by maize. Combined use of FYM and biofertilizers significantly increased phosphorus uptake by maize and combined use of FYM and Zn also significantly increased the phosphorus uptake by maize.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of FYM, biofertilizers and zinc significantly increased phosphorus uptake by maize in a field experiment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Application of FYM, biofertilizers and zince1
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0other
Second interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
phosphorus uptakee1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Instructional Farme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of FYM, biofertilizers (Azotobacter and VAM) and zinc on phosphorus uptake by maize during two consecutive years of 2006-07 and 2007-08 at Instructional Farm, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–311 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of FYM, biofertilizers and zinc significantly increased phosphorus uptake by maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined use of FYM and biofertilizers significantly increased phosphorus uptake by maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
Combined use of FYM and biofertilizerse2
Outcome
phosphorus uptakee2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Combined use of FYM and biofertilizers significantly increased phosphorus uptake by maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined use of FYM and zinc significantly increased phosphorus uptake by maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse3
Treatment
combined use of FYM and Zne3
Outcome
phosphorus uptakee3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“combined use of FYM and Zn also significantly increased the phosphorus uptake by maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–589 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

231 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · Azotobacter · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · Azotobacter · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.