Paper · 2016 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Effect of Waterlogging on Carbohydrate Metabolism and the Quality of Fiber in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Jie Kuai; Yinglong Chen; Youhua Wang; et al.

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Transient waterlogging occurs frequently in the Yangtze River and adversely affects cotton fiber quality. However, the carbohydrate metabolic mechanism that affects fiber quality after waterlogging remains undescribed. Here, the effects of five waterlogging levels (0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 days) were assessed during flowering and boll formation to characterize the carbohydrates, enzymes and genes that affect the fiber quality of cotton after waterlogging. The cellulose and sucrose contents of cotton fibers were significantly decreased after waterlogging for 6 (WL6), 9 (WL9), and 12 d (WL12), although these properties were unaffected after 3 (WL3) and 6 days at the fruiting branch 14-15 (FB14-15). Sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) was the most sensitive to waterlogging among the enzymes tested. SPS activity was decreased by waterlogging at FB6-7, whereas it was significantly enhanced under WL3-6 at FB10-15. Waterlogging down-regulated the expression of fiber invertase at 10 days post anthesis (DPA), whereas that of expansin, β-1,4-glucanase and endoxyloglucan transferase (XET) was up-regulated with increasing waterlogging time. Increased mRNA levels and activities of fiber SuSy at each fruiting branch indicated that SuSy was the main enzyme responsible for sucrose degradation because it was markedly induced by waterlogging and was active even when waterlogging was discontinued. We therefore concluded that the reduction in fiber sucrose and down-regulation of invertase at 10 DPA led to a markedly shorter fiber length under conditions WL6-12. Significantly decreased fiber strength at FB6-11 for WL6-12 was the result of the inhibition of cellulose synthesis and the up-regulation of expansin, β-1,4-glucanase and XET, whereas fiber strength increased under WL3-6 at FB14-15 due to the increased cellulose content of the fibers. Most of the indictors tested revealed that WL6 resulted in the best compensatory performance, whereas exposure to waterlogged conditions for more than 6 days led to an irreversible limitation in fiber development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging for 6, 9 and 12 days significantly decreased cellulose and sucrose contents of cotton fibers.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
cotton fiberse1
Treatment
waterlogging for 6 (WL6), 9 (WL9), and 12 d (WL12)e1
Outcome
cellulose and sucrose contentse1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cellulose and sucrose contents of cotton fibers were significantly decreased after waterlogging for 6 (WL6), 9 (WL9), and 12 d (WL12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cellulose and sucrose contents were unaffected by waterlogging for 3 and 6 days at fruiting branches 14-15.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
fruiting branch 14-15 (FB14-15)e1
Treatment
waterlogginge1
Outcome
cellulose and sucrose contentse1
Direction
unaffectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cellulose and sucrose contents of cotton fibers were significantly decreased after waterlogging for 6 (WL6), 9 (WL9), and 12 d (WL12), although these properties were unaffected after 3 (WL3) and 6 days at the fruiting branch 14-15 (FB14-15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose phosphate synthase was the enzyme most sensitive to waterlogging among the enzymes tested.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge1
Gene
Sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS)e1
Outcome
sensitive to waterlogginge1
Direction
most sensitivee1
Comparator
the enzymes testede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) was the most sensitive to waterlogging among the enzymes tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased SPS activity at fruiting branches 6-7.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
FB6-7e1
Treatment
waterlogginge1
Gene
SPSe1
Outcome
SPS activitye1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“SPS activity was decreased by waterlogging at FB6-7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging for WL3-6 significantly enhanced SPS activity at fruiting branches 10-15.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
FB10-15e2
Treatment
WL3-6e2
Gene
SPSe2
Outcome
SPS activitye2
Direction
significantly enhancede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“SPS activity was decreased by waterlogging at FB6-7, whereas it was significantly enhanced under WL3-6 at FB10-15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging down-regulated fiber invertase expression at 10 days post anthesis.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
10 days post anthesis (DPA)e1
Treatment
Waterlogginge1
Gene
fiber invertasee1
Outcome
expression of fiber invertasee1
Direction
down-regulatede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Waterlogging down-regulated the expression of fiber invertase at 10 days post anthesis (DPA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expansin, beta-1,4-glucanase and XET were up-regulated with increasing waterlogging time.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
increasing waterlogging timee1
Gene
expansine1
Outcome
expansin, β-1,4-glucanase and endoxyloglucan transferase (XET)e1
Direction
up-regulatede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas that of expansin, β-1,4-glucanase and endoxyloglucan transferase (XET) was up-regulated with increasing waterlogging time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging increased mRNA levels and activities of fiber SuSy at each fruiting branch.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
fruiting branche1
Treatment
waterlogginge1
Gene
SuSye1
Outcome
mRNA levels and activities of fiber SuSye1
Direction
Increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increased mRNA levels and activities of fiber SuSy at each fruiting branch indicated that SuSy was the main enzyme responsible for sucrose degradation because it was markedly induced by waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SuSy remained active after waterlogging was discontinued.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Gene
SuSye2
Outcome
active even when waterlogging was discontinuede1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“it was markedly induced by waterlogging and was active even when waterlogging was discontinued”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1391 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increased mRNA levels and activities of fiber SuSy at each fruiting branch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1212 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SuSy was the main enzyme responsible for sucrose degradation in cotton fiber.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Gene
SuSye1
Outcome
sucrose degradatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increased mRNA levels and activities of fiber SuSy at each fruiting branch indicated that SuSy was the main enzyme responsible for sucrose degradation because it was markedly induced by waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1336 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in fiber sucrose and down-regulated invertase at 10 DPA were associated with markedly shorter fiber length under WL6-12.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
WL6-12e1
Gene
invertasee1
Compound
sucrosee1
Outcome
fiber lengthe1
Direction
markedly shortere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“We therefore concluded that the reduction in fiber sucrose and down-regulation of invertase at 10 DPA led to a markedly shorter fiber length under conditions WL6-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging for WL6-12 significantly decreased fiber strength at fruiting branches 6-11.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
FB6-11e1
Treatment
WL6-12e1
Outcome
fiber strengthe1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly decreased fiber strength at FB6-11 for WL6-12 was the result of the inhibition of cellulose synthesis and the up-regulation of expansin, β-1,4-glucanase and XET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber strength increased under WL3-6 at fruiting branches 14-15, due to increased fiber cellulose content.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
FB14-15e1
Treatment
WL3-6e1
Compound
cellulosee1
Outcome
fiber strengthe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“fiber strength increased under WL3-6 at FB14-15 due to the increased cellulose content of the fibers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1743–1843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WL6 gave the best compensatory performance across most indicators tested.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
WL6e1
Outcome
compensatory performancee1
Direction
beste1
Qualifier
Most of the indictors testede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Most of the indictors tested revealed that WL6 resulted in the best compensatory performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1845–1937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogged conditions for more than 6 days led to an irreversible limitation of fiber development.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
exposure to waterlogged conditions for more than 6 dayse1
Outcome
fiber developmente1
Direction
limitatione1
Qualifier
irreversiblee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“exposure to waterlogged conditions for more than 6 days led to an irreversible limitation in fiber development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2057 · show in text ↑

flooding · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

flooding · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.