Paper · 2010 · Pakistan Journal of Botany

SEED PRIMING AND PHOSPHORUS APPLICATION ENHANCE PHENOLOGY AND DRY MATTER PRODUCTION OF WHEAT

S. K. Khalil; S. A. Khan; Abdur Rahman; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Phenology and dry matter are important traits being affected by seed priming and soil phosphorus (P2O5) application. Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours. Unprimed treatment was included as control. Four levels of P2O5 (0, 25, 50 and 75 kg P2O5 ha -1 ) were applied to soil. Priming enhanced days to emergence, anthesis and increased dry matter (DM) production compared with non primed (control). Seed primed with 0.3% P2O5 solution took less time to anthesis (110 days). DM yield increased with each increment of priming and maximum DM yield (6051 kg ha -1 ) was obtained from seeds primed in 0.2% P2O5 solution. Priming had non significant effect on spike length, spike m -2 and days to maturity. Water primed seed took less time to emergence (16 days). Soil P2O5 application enhanced days to heading, anthesis, maturity and increased DM yield, while days to emergence, spike m -2 and spike length were not affected. Earlier heading, anthesis, maturity and highest DM yield was recorded at 75 kg P2O5 ha -1 . Priming with 0.2% P2O5 solution and 50 kg P2O5 ha -1 soil application are the best for obtaining maximum DM and enhancement of phenology.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming increased dry matter production of wheat compared with non-primed seed.

Material
Saleem-2000e0
Treatment
Priminge1
Outcome
dry matter (DM) productione1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
non primed (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Priming enhanced days to emergence, anthesis and increased dry matter (DM) production compared with non primed (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming enhanced days to emergence and anthesis of wheat compared with non-primed seed.

Material
Saleem-2000e0
Treatment
Priminge1
Outcome
days to emergence, anthesise1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
non primed (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Priming enhanced days to emergence, anthesis and increased dry matter (DM) production compared with non primed (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed primed with 0.3% P2O5 solution took less time to anthesis (110 days) than unprimed seed.

Treatment
0.3% P2O5 solutione3
Outcome
time to anthesise3
Direction
less timee3
Value
110 dayse3
Comparator
Unprimed treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–212 · show in text ↑
e2

“Unprimed treatment was included as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–256 · show in text ↑
e3

“Seed primed with 0.3% P2O5 solution took less time to anthesis (110 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–529 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DM yield increased with each increment of seed priming in wheat.

Treatment
increment of priminge4
Outcome
DM yielde4
Direction
increasede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–212 · show in text ↑
e4

“DM yield increased with each increment of priming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds primed in 0.2% P2O5 solution gave the maximum DM yield (6051 kg ha -1).

Treatment
0.2% P2O5 solutione5
Outcome
DM yielde5
Direction
maximume5
Value
6051 kg ha -1e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–212 · show in text ↑
e5

“maximum DM yield (6051 kg ha -1 ) was obtained from seeds primed in 0.2% P2O5 solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming had a non-significant effect on spike length, spike m-2 and days to maturity of wheat.

Treatment
Priminge6
Outcome
spike length, spike m -2 and days to maturitye6
Direction
non significante6
Comparator
Unprimed treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–212 · show in text ↑
e2

“Unprimed treatment was included as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–256 · show in text ↑
e6

“Priming had non significant effect on spike length, spike m -2 and days to maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-primed seed took less time to emergence (16 days) in wheat.

Treatment
Water primed seede7
Outcome
time to emergencee7
Direction
less timee7
Value
16 dayse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–212 · show in text ↑
e7

“Water primed seed took less time to emergence (16 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–813 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P2O5 application enhanced days to heading, anthesis and maturity of wheat.

Treatment
Soil P2O5 applicatione1
Outcome
days to heading, anthesis, maturitye1
Direction
enhancede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil P2O5 application enhanced days to heading, anthesis, maturity and increased DM yield, while days to emergence, spike m -2 and spike length were not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–976 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P2O5 application increased DM yield of wheat.

Treatment
Soil P2O5 applicatione1
Outcome
DM yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil P2O5 application enhanced days to heading, anthesis, maturity and increased DM yield, while days to emergence, spike m -2 and spike length were not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–976 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P2O5 application did not affect days to emergence, spike m-2 or spike length of wheat.

Treatment
Soil P2O5 applicatione1
Outcome
days to emergence, spike m -2 and spike lengthe1
Direction
not affectede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil P2O5 application enhanced days to heading, anthesis, maturity and increased DM yield, while days to emergence, spike m -2 and spike length were not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–976 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier heading, anthesis and maturity of wheat were recorded at 75 kg P2O5 ha-1.

Treatment
75 kg P2O5 ha -1e1
Outcome
heading, anthesis, maturitye1
Direction
Earliere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Earlier heading, anthesis, maturity and highest DM yield was recorded at 75 kg P2O5 ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1067 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest DM yield of wheat was recorded at 75 kg P2O5 ha-1.

Treatment
75 kg P2O5 ha -1e1
Outcome
DM yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Earlier heading, anthesis, maturity and highest DM yield was recorded at 75 kg P2O5 ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1067 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Priming with 0.2% P2O5 solution plus 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 soil application is recommended for maximum DM and phenology of wheat.

Outcome
Priming with 0.2% P2O5 solution and 50 kg P2O5 ha -1 soil applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat variety Saleem-2000 was primed in 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% P2O5 solutions and water for 10 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Priming with 0.2% P2O5 solution and 50 kg P2O5 ha -1 soil application are the best for obtaining maximum DM and enhancement of phenology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1206 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · phenology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 158 positive, 35 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

293 papers: 259 positive, 34 negative or no effect

258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

289 papers more in this group

See all 293 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 270 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.