Paper · 2020 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Integrating Management Practices to Decrease Deoxynivalenol Contamination in Soft Red Winter Wheat

Katherine S. Rod; Carl A. Bradley; David A. Van Sanford; et al.

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fusarium graminearum, the major causal agent of Fusarium head blight (FHB) of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in the U.S., can produce mycotoxins, such as deoxynivalenol (DON), during infection. Contamination of wheat grain with DON is a major concern for wheat producers and millers, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has set advisory levels for DON in finished wheat products for human and animal consumption. Practices utilized to manage FHB and DON contamination include planting wheat cultivars with moderate resistance to FHB and applying efficacious fungicides at the beginning of anthesis. Under severe epidemics, DON contamination can exceed FDA advisory levels despite implementation of these measures. Additionally, fungicide efficacy can be limited when anthesis is not uniform among plants in the field, which can occur when planting is delayed or if there is non-uniform seedling establishment. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of 1) in-furrow phosphorus application at planting and seeding rate on heading and anthesis uniformity, FHB symptomology, DON contamination, grain yield, yield components, and test weight; and 2) harvesting at different grain moisture concentrations on FHB symptomology, DON contamination, grain yield and test weight. Field trials were established in Princeton, Kentucky, from 2017 to 2019, to evaluate in-furrow phosphorus application at planting (0 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 47 kg P2O5 ha-1); seeding rate (376 live seeds m-2 and 603 live seeds m-2); and grain moisture at harvest (20 to 22% and 13 to 15%). In-furrow phosphorus increased grain yield and spikes m-2, but had no effect on heading and anthesis uniformity or DON contamination. The 603 live seeds m-2 seeding rate decreased the number of days to Zadoks 60 for the November planted wheat, and decreased FHB incidence, but did not decrease DON contamination. Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisture decreased Fusarium damaged kernel ratings and percent kernel infection but increased DON contamination in the harvested grain. Although in-furrow phosphorus, seeding rate, and harvesting 20 to 22% grain moisture did not decrease DON contamination, there is potential for these treatments to alleviate negative effects of late planted wheat grown in stressful environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In-furrow phosphorus increased grain yield

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
In-furrow phosphoruse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In-furrow phosphorus increased grain yield and spikes m-2, but had no effect on heading and anthesis uniformity or DON contamination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In-furrow phosphorus increased spikes m-2

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
In-furrow phosphoruse0
Outcome
spikes m-2e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In-furrow phosphorus increased grain yield and spikes m-2, but had no effect on heading and anthesis uniformity or DON contamination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In-furrow phosphorus no effect heading and anthesis uniformity

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
In-furrow phosphoruse0
Outcome
heading and anthesis uniformitye0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In-furrow phosphorus increased grain yield and spikes m-2, but had no effect on heading and anthesis uniformity or DON contamination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In-furrow phosphorus no effect DON contamination

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
In-furrow phosphoruse0
Outcome
DON contaminatione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In-furrow phosphorus increased grain yield and spikes m-2, but had no effect on heading and anthesis uniformity or DON contamination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 603 live seeds m-2 seeding rate decreased number of days to Zadoks 60

Treatment
603 live seeds m-2 seeding ratee0
Outcome
number of days to Zadoks 60e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
November planted wheate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 603 live seeds m-2 seeding rate decreased the number of days to Zadoks 60 for the November planted wheat, and decreased FHB incidence, but did not decrease DON contamination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 603 live seeds m-2 seeding rate decreased FHB incidence

Treatment
603 live seeds m-2 seeding ratee0
Outcome
FHB incidencee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 603 live seeds m-2 seeding rate decreased the number of days to Zadoks 60 for the November planted wheat, and decreased FHB incidence, but did not decrease DON contamination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 603 live seeds m-2 seeding rate did not decrease DON contamination

Treatment
603 live seeds m-2 seeding ratee0
Outcome
DON contaminatione0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 603 live seeds m-2 seeding rate decreased the number of days to Zadoks 60 for the November planted wheat, and decreased FHB incidence, but did not decrease DON contamination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisture decreased Fusarium damaged kernel ratings

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisturee0
Outcome
Fusarium damaged kernel ratingse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisture decreased Fusarium damaged kernel ratings and percent kernel infection but increased DON contamination in the harvested grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–2054 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisture decreased percent kernel infection

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisturee0
Outcome
percent kernel infectione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisture decreased Fusarium damaged kernel ratings and percent kernel infection but increased DON contamination in the harvested grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–2054 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisture increased DON contamination

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisturee0
Outcome
DON contaminatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisture decreased Fusarium damaged kernel ratings and percent kernel infection but increased DON contamination in the harvested grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–2054 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest these practices could alleviate negative effects on late planted wheat in stressful environments.

Treatment
these treatmentse0
Outcome
alleviate negative effects of late planted wheate0
Qualifier
stressful environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is potential for these treatments to alleviate negative effects of late planted wheat grown in stressful environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2176–2299 · show in text ↑

density · phenology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · phenology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

density · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 10 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.