Paper · 2008 · Pakistan Journal of Botany

CAN LEAF WATER RELATION PARAMETERS BE USED AS SELECTION CRITERIA FOR SALT TOLERANCE IN SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)

Ejaz Hussain Siddiqi; Muhammad Ashraf

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
25
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to assess inter-cultivar variation for salt tolerance in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) using water relation parameters as selection criteria. Ten available lines, Safflower-31, Safflower-32, Safflower-33, Safflower-34, Safflower-35, Safflower-36, Safflower37, Safflower-38, Safflower-39 and Safflower-78, were screened at 150 mM of NaCl at the vegetative stage. Salt stress caused a marked reduction in shoot fresh biomass and all water relations parameters, relative water content (RWC), water potential (Ψw), and osmotic potential (Ψs) except leaf turgor potential (Ψp). Accessions Safflower-36, Safflower-37 and Safflower-38 were higher, Safflower-39 and Safflower-78 lower, while the remaining accessions intermediate in shoot biomass production under saline conditions. Salt stress also adversely affected all water relation parameters, (RWC, Ψw, Ψs, and Ψp), however, the effect was more pronounced on leaf Ψw, Ψs, and Ψp. Although a great magnitude of inter-cultivar variation for salt tolerance was observed in the set of 10 accessions of safflower with respect to shoot biomass production, no one of the water relation parameters was found helpful in discriminating among the lines for salt tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress at 150 mM NaCl markedly reduced shoot fresh biomass in safflower at the vegetative stage.

Organ / stage
vegetative stagee1
Treatment
150 mM of NaCle1
Outcome
shoot fresh biomasse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“Salt stress caused a marked reduction in shoot fresh biomass and all water relations parameters, relative water content (RWC), water potential (Ψw), and osmotic potential (Ψs) except leaf turgor potential (Ψp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–605 · show in text ↑
e1

“screened at 150 mM of NaCl at the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress reduced relative water content, water potential and osmotic potential in safflower.

Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
relative water content (RWC), water potential (Ψw), and osmotic potential (Ψs)e0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“Salt stress caused a marked reduction in shoot fresh biomass and all water relations parameters, relative water content (RWC), water potential (Ψw), and osmotic potential (Ψs) except leaf turgor potential (Ψp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress affected leaf water potential, osmotic potential and turgor potential more strongly than relative water content in safflower.

Treatment
Salt stresse2
Outcome
leaf Ψw, Ψs, and Ψpe2
Direction
more pronouncede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–122 · show in text ↑
e2

“Salt stress also adversely affected all water relation parameters, (RWC, Ψw, Ψs, and Ψp), however, the effect was more pronounced on leaf Ψw, Ψs, and Ψp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–961 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Safflower-36, Safflower-37 and Safflower-38 had higher shoot biomass production under saline conditions.

Material
Safflower-36, Safflower-37 and Safflower-38e3
Treatment
saline conditionse3
Outcome
shoot biomass productione3
Direction
highere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Accessions Safflower-36, Safflower-37 and Safflower-38 were higher, Safflower-39 and Safflower-78 lower, while the remaining accessions intermediate in shoot biomass production under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–807 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Safflower-39 and Safflower-78 had lower shoot biomass production under saline conditions.

Material
Safflower-39 and Safflower-78e3
Treatment
saline conditionse3
Outcome
shoot biomass productione3
Direction
lowere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Accessions Safflower-36, Safflower-37 and Safflower-38 were higher, Safflower-39 and Safflower-78 lower, while the remaining accessions intermediate in shoot biomass production under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–807 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining safflower accessions had intermediate shoot biomass production under saline conditions.

Material
remaining accessionse3
Treatment
saline conditionse3
Outcome
shoot biomass productione3
Direction
intermediatee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Accessions Safflower-36, Safflower-37 and Safflower-38 were higher, Safflower-39 and Safflower-78 lower, while the remaining accessions intermediate in shoot biomass production under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–807 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the water relation parameters discriminated among the safflower lines for salt tolerance, compared with shoot biomass production.

Outcome
discriminating among the lines for salt tolerancee4
Comparator
shoot biomass productione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–122 · show in text ↑
e4

“Although a great magnitude of inter-cultivar variation for salt tolerance was observed in the set of 10 accessions of safflower with respect to shoot biomass production, no one of the water relation parameters was found helpful in discriminating among the lines for salt tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inter-cultivar variation for salt tolerance in safflower was large with respect to shoot biomass production across 10 accessions.

Material
10 accessionse4
Outcome
inter-cultivar variation for salt tolerancee4
Qualifier
with respect to shoot biomass productione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–122 · show in text ↑
e4

“Although a great magnitude of inter-cultivar variation for salt tolerance was observed in the set of 10 accessions of safflower with respect to shoot biomass production, no one of the water relation parameters was found helpful in discriminating among the lines for salt tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1243 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results differ

18 papers: 3 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.