Paper · 2016 · Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)

Effects of Phosphorus and Rhizobium Inoculation on Yield Components and Grain Yield of Some Selected Cowpea Genotypes

S. U. Yahaya; N. I. Galadanchi; Ibrahim Mohammed

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of phosphorus (0, 20, 40kg P 2 O 5 ha -1 ) and rhizobium inoculation (inoculated and un-inoculated) on the yield components and grain yield of three cowpea genotypes (IT93K-452-1, IT97K-573-1-1 and IT98K-499-35) were investigated under field conditions at Bayero University, Kano, Teaching and Research Farm (11 0 59 N; 8 0 25 E; 466m above sea level) and Agricultural Research Station Farm, Minjibir (12 0 10' N, 8 0 39' E; 402m above sea level) in 2014 rainy season.Cowpea genotypes were assigned to the main plot, while phosphorus levels were assigned to the sub-plots.The inoculation was assigned to the sub-sub plot.These were laid out in Split-split plot design and replicated three times.Results of the study indicated significant effect of genotype in all the characters measured except shelling percent.Significantly (p 0.05) higher number of pods per plant, pod weight, fodder and grain yield was observed from IT99K-573-1-1 than all other genotypes evaluated.Similarly, the number of pods per plant, pod weight, fodder and grain yield were significantly influenced by application of phosphorus with better results recorded from 40 kg P2O5 treated plants.Inoculation of cowpea with rhizobium MC92 strain, also recorded significant effect on the measured characters and grain yield.Inoculation of cowpea with rhizobium MC92 along with 40kgP2O5 ha -1 could enhance performance of cowpea particularly with an adaptable genotype like IT99K-573-1-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype had a significant effect on the measured cowpea characters except shelling percent

Material
genotypee1
Outcome
characters measurede1
Qualifier
except shelling percente1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Selected Cowpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results of the study indicated significant effect of genotype in all the characters measured except shelling percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–823 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea genotype IT99K-573-1-1 had higher pods per plant and pod weight than all other genotypes

Material
IT99K-573-1-1e2
Outcome
number of pods per plant, pod weighte2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
all other genotypes evaluatede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Selected Cowpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–117 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly (p 0.05) higher number of pods per plant, pod weight, fodder and grain yield was observed from IT99K-573-1-1 than all other genotypes evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–981 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea genotype IT99K-573-1-1 had higher fodder and grain yield than all other genotypes

Material
IT99K-573-1-1e2
Outcome
fodder and grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
all other genotypes evaluatede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Selected Cowpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–117 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly (p 0.05) higher number of pods per plant, pod weight, fodder and grain yield was observed from IT99K-573-1-1 than all other genotypes evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application significantly influenced pods per plant and pod weight, with better results at 40 kg P2O5 ha-1

Treatment
application of phosphoruse3
Outcome
number of pods per plant, pod weighte3
Direction
bettere3
Qualifier
better results recorded from 40 kg P2O5 treated plantse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Selected Cowpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–117 · show in text ↑
e3

“Similarly, the number of pods per plant, pod weight, fodder and grain yield were significantly influenced by application of phosphorus with better results recorded from 40 kg P2O5 treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application significantly influenced fodder and grain yield, with better results at 40 kg P2O5 ha-1

Treatment
application of phosphoruse3
Outcome
fodder and grain yielde3
Direction
bettere3
Qualifier
better results recorded from 40 kg P2O5 treated plantse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Selected Cowpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–117 · show in text ↑
e3

“Similarly, the number of pods per plant, pod weight, fodder and grain yield were significantly influenced by application of phosphorus with better results recorded from 40 kg P2O5 treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium MC92 inoculation had a significant effect on the measured cowpea characters and grain yield

Treatment
Inoculation of cowpea with rhizobium MC92 straine4
Interactor
rhizobium MC92e4symbiont
Outcome
measured characters and grain yielde4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Selected Cowpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–117 · show in text ↑
e4

“Inoculation of cowpea with rhizobium MC92 strain, also recorded significant effect on the measured characters and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1302 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium MC92 inoculation with 40 kg P2O5 ha-1 could enhance cowpea performance, particularly in genotype IT99K-573-1-1

Material
IT99K-573-1-1e5
Treatment
Inoculation of cowpea with rhizobium MC92 along with 40kgP2O5 ha -1e5
Outcome
performancee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Some Selected Cowpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–117 · show in text ↑
e5

“Inoculation of cowpea with rhizobium MC92 along with 40kgP2O5 ha -1 could enhance performance of cowpea particularly with an adaptable genotype like IT99K-573-1-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1465 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.