Paper · 2016 · Sustainable Environment

Ultrastructural deformation of plant cell under heavy metal stress in Gram seedlings

Uttiya Dey; Naba Kumar Mondal

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
37
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nowadays, heavy metal pollution has become a serious environmental problem on global scale. The heavy metals are non-biodegradable in nature, which can easily accumulate in the organisms of lower trophic level, and enter to the human body system through food chain. From this backdrop, the present experiment highlighted the effect of three heavy metals (Cr, Pb, and Mn) in different concentrations (25, 50, and 75 ppm) on Cicer arietinum in terms of growth physiology, metal uptake, biochemistry, and ultrastructural deformation. The results showed that with increasing metals (Cr and Pb) concentrations from 25 ppm to 75 mg/L both root and shoot length decreased along with root and shoot biomass. However, Mn showed little improvement in all growth physiological parameters at 50 ppm concentration. Biochemical parameters also revealed that both Cr and Pb reduced 64.94 and 69.61% total chlorophyll, respectively, with respect to control. Chlorophyll “a” to “b” ratio was highest in Mn followed by Cr and Pb at higher concentration (75 ppm). Metal accumulation pattern indicated that Cr is less accumulated in root shoot and leaf compared to Mn and Pb in all the studied concentrations. However, accumulation of Mn in shoot was always higher compared to Pb in all studied concentrations. Ultrastructural damage was recorded highest for Cr in root, shoot and leaf at both 25 and 50 ppm concentration. However, at 75 ppm Pb showed highest deformation in root and leaf was observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing chromium concentration from 25 to 75 mg/L decreased chickpea root and shoot length and biomass.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Cre0
Outcome
root and shoot lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
25 ppm to 75 mg/Le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with increasing metals (Cr and Pb) concentrations from 25 ppm to 75 mg/L both root and shoot length decreased along with root and shoot biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–699 · show in text ↑
e1

“on Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing lead concentration from 25 to 75 mg/L decreased chickpea root and shoot length and biomass.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Pbe0
Outcome
root and shoot biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
25 ppm to 75 mg/Le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with increasing metals (Cr and Pb) concentrations from 25 ppm to 75 mg/L both root and shoot length decreased along with root and shoot biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–699 · show in text ↑
e1

“on Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese at 50 ppm slightly improved chickpea growth physiological parameters.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Mne0
Outcome
growth physiological parameterse0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
50 ppm concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mn showed little improvement in all growth physiological parameters at 50 ppm concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“on Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromium reduced total chlorophyll in chickpea by 64.94% compared with control.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Cre0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
reducede0
Value
64.94e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both Cr and Pb reduced 64.94 and 69.61% total chlorophyll, respectively, with respect to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“on Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lead reduced total chlorophyll in chickpea by 69.61% compared with control.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Pbe0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
reducede0
Value
69.61%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both Cr and Pb reduced 64.94 and 69.61% total chlorophyll, respectively, with respect to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“on Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 75 ppm, the chlorophyll a-to-b ratio was highest under manganese, followed by chromium and lead.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Mne0
Outcome
Chlorophyll “a” to “b” ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
75 ppme0
Comparator
Cr and Pbe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll “a” to “b” ratio was highest in Mn followed by Cr and Pb at higher concentration (75 ppm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“on Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–438 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromium accumulated less than manganese and lead in chickpea roots, shoots and leaves across concentrations.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinume1
Organ / stage
root shoot and leafe0
Outcome
Cr is less accumulatede0
Comparator
Mn and Pbe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cr is less accumulated in root shoot and leaf compared to Mn and Pb in all the studied concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“on Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–438 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese accumulation in chickpea shoots was higher than lead accumulation across concentrations.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinume1
Organ / stage
shoote0
Outcome
accumulation of Mne0
Comparator
Pbe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“accumulation of Mn in shoot was always higher compared to Pb in all studied concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1290 · show in text ↑
e1

“on Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromium caused the greatest ultrastructural damage in chickpea roots, shoots and leaves at 25 and 50 ppm.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Cre0
Outcome
Ultrastructural damagee0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
at both 25 and 50 ppm concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ultrastructural damage was recorded highest for Cr in root, shoot and leaf at both 25 and 50 ppm concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1402 · show in text ↑
e1

“on Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 75 ppm, lead caused the greatest deformation in chickpea roots and leaves.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Pbe0
Outcome
deformation in root and leafe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
75 ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 75 ppm Pb showed highest deformation in root and leaf was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1482 · show in text ↑
e1

“on Cicer arietinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–438 · show in text ↑

chromium atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

manganese atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

lead atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

chromium atom · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.