Abstract
At an early growth stage inoculation of both unifoliates of dwarf beans with <it>Pseudomonas phaseolicola</it> (Burk) Dows. Race 1 inhibited trifoliate production, but inoculation of one unifoliate only reduced subsequent leaf expansion, and the opposite uninfected unifoliate became significantly larger than unifoliates on uninfected plants. Inoculation of the first or second trifoliates or the cotyledonary node at a later developmental stage all reduced primary-shoot growth by 25 to 30 per cent, but there were marked differences in the extent of secondary-shoot development in leaf axils below the inoculation point. The growth effects were related to the distribution and activity of the bacterial toxin within the plant, particularly to differences in the rate of invasion of apical regions. The primary toxin effects appear to be on apical function and leaf expansion.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Early inoculation of both unifoliates inhibited trifoliate production.
- Taxon
- dwarf beanse0
- Treatment
- inoculation of both unifoliatese0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas phaseolicolae0pathogen
- Outcome
- trifoliate productione0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“At an early growth stage inoculation of both unifoliates of dwarf beans with <it>Pseudomonas phaseolicola</it> (Burk) Dows. Race 1 inhibited trifoliate production”
Claim · model-written summary
Early inoculation of one unifoliate reduced subsequent leaf expansion.
- Taxon
- Dwarf Beant0
- Treatment
- inoculation of one unifoliatee0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas phaseolicolat0pathogen
- Outcome
- subsequent leaf expansione0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“inoculation of one unifoliate only reduced subsequent leaf expansion”
t0“Dwarf Bean to Infection by Pseudomonas phaseolicola”
Claim · model-written summary
The opposite uninfected unifoliate became significantly larger than those on uninfected plants.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation of one unifoliate only reduced subsequent leaf expansion, and the opposite uninfected unifoliate became significantly larger than unifoliates on uninfected plants.”
t0“Growth Responses of Dwarf Bean to Infection by Pseudomonas phaseolicola”
Claim · model-written summary
Later inoculation at the first trifoliate reduced primary shoot growth by 25 to 30 per cent.
- Taxon
- Dwarf Beant0
- Treatment
- Inoculation of the firste0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas phaseolicolat0pathogen
- Outcome
- primary-shoot growthe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 25 to 30 per cente0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of the first or second trifoliates or the cotyledonary node at a later developmental stage all reduced primary-shoot growth by 25 to 30 per cent”
t0“Dwarf Bean to Infection by Pseudomonas phaseolicola”
Claim · model-written summary
Later inoculation at the second trifoliate reduced primary shoot growth by 25 to 30 per cent.
- Taxon
- Dwarf Beant0
- Treatment
- second trifoliatese0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas phaseolicolat0pathogen
- Outcome
- primary-shoot growthe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 25 to 30 per cente0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of the first or second trifoliates or the cotyledonary node at a later developmental stage all reduced primary-shoot growth by 25 to 30 per cent”
t0“Dwarf Bean to Infection by Pseudomonas phaseolicola”
Claim · model-written summary
Later inoculation at the cotyledonary node reduced primary shoot growth by 25 to 30 per cent.
- Taxon
- Dwarf Beant0
- Treatment
- cotyledonary nodee0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas phaseolicolat0pathogen
- Outcome
- primary-shoot growthe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 25 to 30 per cente0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of the first or second trifoliates or the cotyledonary node at a later developmental stage all reduced primary-shoot growth by 25 to 30 per cent”
t0“Dwarf Bean to Infection by Pseudomonas phaseolicola”
Claim · model-written summary
Secondary shoot development differed below the inoculation point.
Verbatim
e0“there were marked differences in the extent of secondary-shoot development in leaf axils below the inoculation point.”
t0“Dwarf Bean to Infection by Pseudomonas phaseolicola”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
122 papers more in this group
See all 126 papers →inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 153 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
191 papers more in this group
See all 195 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.