Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Early inoculation of both unifoliates inhibited trifoliate production.

A claim from Growth Responses of Dwarf Bean to Infection by Pseudomonas phaseolicola (Burk) Dows · 1972

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: dwarf beanse0
Treatment: inoculation of both unifoliatese0
Interactor: Pseudomonas phaseolicolae0pathogen
Outcome: trifoliate productione0
Direction: inhibitede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0
“At an early growth stage inoculation of both unifoliates of dwarf beans with <it>Pseudomonas phaseolicola</it> (Burk) Dows. Race 1 inhibited trifoliate production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–162

Title

Growth Responses of Dwarf Bean to Infection by Pseudomonas phaseolicola (Burk) Dows

C. N. HALE; R. WHITBREAD; B. JANSSEN; et al. Annals of Botany 1972. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084566

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Early inoculation of one unifoliate reduced subsequent leaf expansion.
Intervention effect The opposite uninfected unifoliate became significantly larger than those on uninfected plants.
Intervention effect Later inoculation at the first trifoliate reduced primary shoot growth by 25 to 30 per cent.
Intervention effect Later inoculation at the second trifoliate reduced primary shoot growth by 25 to 30 per cent.
Intervention effect Later inoculation at the cotyledonary node reduced primary shoot growth by 25 to 30 per cent.
Observation Secondary shoot development differed below the inoculation point.

Record rev-4bcf800a67ef6ed92ff3beda393aece796391439ebbf6ea0ba06f0bba19f1847 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this claim · 153 in the opposite direction

positive
Inoculation alone raised common bean grain yield by 60–78%.
Yield and economic benefits of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and soybean (Glycine max) inoculation in northern Tanzania · 2006 · compared with uninoculated unfertilised plots
Opposite direction
positive
Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased growth, symbiotic performance and yield.
Grain yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties is markedly increased by rhizobial inoculation and phosphorus application in Ethiopia · 2017
Opposite direction
positive
Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly enhanced seed yield under low phosphorus.
An automated greenhouse sand culture system suitable for studies of P nutrition · 1990
Opposite direction
positive
Common bean yield reached 4.8 t ha−1 with inoculation, phosphorus and manure.
Benefits of inoculation, P fertilizer and manure on yields of common bean and soybean also increase yield of subsequent maize · 2017 · compared with unamended control plots
Opposite direction
positive
EM increased bean yield independent of substrate.
Soil Application of Effective Microorganisms (EM) Maintains Leaf Photosynthetic Efficiency, Increases Seed Yield and Quality Traits of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants Grown on Different Substrates · 2019 · compared with the control plants
Opposite direction
positive
Microbial inoculations increased snap bean yield by 26% over the different salinity treatments.
Effect of Salinity Stress and Microbial Inoculations on Glomalin Production and Plant Growth Parameters of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) · 2019 · compared with different salinity treatments
Opposite direction
positive
PGPR increased pods per plant, seeds per pod, and 100 seed weight.
Evaluation of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Seeds Inoculation with Rhizobium phaseoli and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Yield and Yield Components · 2008
Opposite direction
positive
Resistant lines had little or no yield loss under inoculation compared with disease-free plots.
Xanthomonas Resistance of Phaseolus Interspecific Cross Selections Confirmed by Field Performance · 1992 · compared with disease-free
Opposite direction

186 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Other papers on the same question

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results