Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

Effect of Salinity Stress and Microbial Inoculations on Glomalin Production and Plant Growth Parameters of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Claudia Lyl Garcia; Sanku Dattamudi; Saoli Chanda; et al.

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
74
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salinity is a major abiotic stress that can adversely affect plant growth, yield, other physiological parameters, and soil health. Salinity stress on biomass production of salt-sensitive crops, like snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), is a serious problem, and specifically in South Florida, USA, where saline soils can be found in major agricultural lands. Research studies focused on the ‘snap bean–Rhizobium–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)’ relationship under salinity stress are limited, and fewer studies have evaluated how this tripartite symbiosis affects glomalin production (GRSP), a glycoprotein released by AMF. A shade house experiment was conducted to elucidate the effects of three microbial inoculations (IC = inoculation control; IT1 = AMF and IT2 = AMF + Rhizobium) on three salinity treatments (SC = salinity control 0.6 dS m−1, S1 = 1.0 dS m−1, and S2 = 2.0 dS m−1) on snap bean growth and yield. Our results indicate that S2 reduced 20% bean biomass production, 11% plant height, 13% root weight, and 23% AMF root colonization. However, microbial inoculations increased 26% bean yield over different salinity treatments. Maximum salinity stress (S2) increased 6% and 18% GRSP production than S1 and SC, respectively, indicating the relative advantage of abiotic stress on AMF’s role in soil. Dual inoculation (IT2) demonstrated a beneficial role on all physiological parameters, biomass production, and GRSP synthesis compared to single inoculation (IT1) treatment with all three salinity levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity at 2.0 dS m-1 reduced snap bean biomass production by 20%.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
S2 = 2.0 dS m−1e2
Outcome
bean biomass productione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
20%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress on biomass production of salt-sensitive crops, like snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), is a serious problem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–251 · show in text ↑
e1

“Our results indicate that S2 reduced 20% bean biomass production, 11% plant height, 13% root weight, and 23% AMF root colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1045 · show in text ↑
e2

“S2 = 2.0 dS m−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity at 2.0 dS m-1 reduced snap bean plant height by 11%.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
S2 = 2.0 dS m−1e2
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
reducede1
Value
11%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress on biomass production of salt-sensitive crops, like snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), is a serious problem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–251 · show in text ↑
e1

“Our results indicate that S2 reduced 20% bean biomass production, 11% plant height, 13% root weight, and 23% AMF root colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1045 · show in text ↑
e2

“S2 = 2.0 dS m−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity at 2.0 dS m-1 reduced snap bean root weight by 13%.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
S2 = 2.0 dS m−1e2
Outcome
root weighte1
Direction
reducede1
Value
13%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress on biomass production of salt-sensitive crops, like snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), is a serious problem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–251 · show in text ↑
e1

“Our results indicate that S2 reduced 20% bean biomass production, 11% plant height, 13% root weight, and 23% AMF root colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1045 · show in text ↑
e2

“S2 = 2.0 dS m−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity at 2.0 dS m-1 reduced AMF root colonization of snap bean by 23%.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
S2 = 2.0 dS m−1e2
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
AMF root colonizatione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
23%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress on biomass production of salt-sensitive crops, like snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), is a serious problem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–251 · show in text ↑
e1

“Our results indicate that S2 reduced 20% bean biomass production, 11% plant height, 13% root weight, and 23% AMF root colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1045 · show in text ↑
e2

“S2 = 2.0 dS m−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculations increased snap bean yield by 26% over the different salinity treatments.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
microbial inoculationse3
Outcome
bean yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
26%e3
Comparator
different salinity treatmentse3

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress on biomass production of salt-sensitive crops, like snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), is a serious problem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–251 · show in text ↑
e3

“microbial inoculations increased 26% bean yield over different salinity treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum salinity (S2) increased glomalin (GRSP) production by 6% compared with S1.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
Maximum salinity stress (S2)e4
Outcome
GRSP productione4
Direction
increasede4
Value
6%e4
Comparator
S1e4

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress on biomass production of salt-sensitive crops, like snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), is a serious problem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–251 · show in text ↑
e4

“Maximum salinity stress (S2) increased 6% and 18% GRSP production than S1 and SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum salinity (S2) increased glomalin (GRSP) production by 18% compared with the salinity control.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
Maximum salinity stress (S2)e4
Outcome
GRSP productione4
Direction
increasede4
Value
18%e4
Comparator
SCe4

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress on biomass production of salt-sensitive crops, like snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), is a serious problem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–251 · show in text ↑
e4

“Maximum salinity stress (S2) increased 6% and 18% GRSP production than S1 and SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation with AMF and Rhizobium (IT2) had a beneficial effect on physiological parameters, biomass and GRSP synthesis compared with single AMF inoculation (IT1).

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
Dual inoculation (IT2)e5
Outcome
physiological parameters, biomass production, and GRSP synthesise5
Comparator
single inoculation (IT1) treatmente5

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress on biomass production of salt-sensitive crops, like snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), is a serious problem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–251 · show in text ↑
e5

“Dual inoculation (IT2) demonstrated a beneficial role on all physiological parameters, biomass production, and GRSP synthesis compared to single inoculation (IT1) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1483 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.