Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dual inoculation with AMF and Rhizobium (IT2) had a beneficial effect on physiological parameters, biomass and GRSP synthesis compared with single AMF inoculation (IT1).

A claim from Effect of Salinity Stress and Microbial Inoculations on Glomalin Production and Plant Growth Parameters of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation with AMF and Rhizobium (IT2) had a beneficial effect on physiological parameters, biomass and GRSP synthesis compared with single AMF inoculation (IT1).

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
Dual inoculation (IT2)e5
Outcome
physiological parameters, biomass production, and GRSP synthesise5
Comparator
single inoculation (IT1) treatmente5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress on biomass production of salt-sensitive crops, like snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), is a serious problem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–251
e5

“Dual inoculation (IT2) demonstrated a beneficial role on all physiological parameters, biomass production, and GRSP synthesis compared to single inoculation (IT1) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1483

Title

Effect of Salinity Stress and Microbial Inoculations on Glomalin Production and Plant Growth Parameters of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Claudia Lyl Garcia; Sanku Dattamudi; Saoli Chanda; et al. Agronomy 2019. doi:10.3390/agronomy9090545

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-754d99e0e5225ca2b89e493f13909498beceb95c348fcf98cccd8c1990fe9969 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Inoculated treatments yielded significantly less than the control.

    Effects of Angular Leaf Spot and Rust on Yield Loss of Phaseolus vulgaris · 2001 · compared with control treatment

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    LCS0306 inoculation gave grain yield similar to nitrogen-fertilised controls.

    Formulation of a Highly Effective Inoculant for Common Bean Based on an Autochthonous Elite Strain of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli, and Genomic-Based Insights Into Its Agronomic Performance · 2019 · compared with nitrogen-fertilised controls

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Under BGYMV inoculation, PR9556-158 had fewer seeds per pod than PR9556-171.

    Inheritance of Normal Pod Development in Bean Golden Yellow Mosaic Resistant Common Bean · 2004 · compared with PR9556-171

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Rhizobia inoculation did not significantly increase seed yields or reduce the response to N fertilizer.

    Fertilizer responses of dry bean in southern Alberta · 2001

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation under full N did not raise biomass or pod yield.

    Impact of rhizobial inoculation and reduced N supply on biomass production and biological N2 fixation in common bean grown hydroponically · 2017 · compared with non‐inoculation

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Inoculated common bean cultivars showed reductions in pod number, grain number, and grain mass.

    Charcoal rot severity and yield components of common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina · 2020

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Inoculation had no effect on yield.

    Field Trials with Canadian Wonder Beans in Malawi · 1973

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Inoculation produced no bean yield response at either site.

    Nitrogen application and inoculation with Rhizobium tropici on common bean in the fall/winter · 2014

    Opposite direction

186 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.