Paper · 2015 · Horticultural Science

Influence of rootstocks on different sweet cherry cultivars and accumulation of heavy metals in leaves and fruit

A. Stachowiak; M. Bosiacki; S. Świerczyński; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
18
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Two seedling rootstocks of Mahaleb cherry (Prunus mahaleb L.) from a German type cv. Alpruna marked as No. 2 and No. 6 were selected for their semi-dwarfing properties from biotypes growing at the Rural Experimental Station in Baranowo belonging to the University of Life Sciences in Poznan, Poland. In an orchard experiment in 2012-2013, growth and yield of eight- and nine-year old trees of the cvs Regina, Summit and Vanda were studied. These cultivars were grafted on Mahaleb cherry No. 2 and No. 6 and were compared to the control rootstock Mazzard (Prunus avium L.) cv. Alkavo. The Mahaleb cherry biotypes significantly decreased the trunk cross-sectional area and the crown volume of the trees. The cultivars grafted on Mahaleb cherry biotypes No. 2 and No. 6 had more flowers and they gave a higher yield. The yield efficiency for cultivars grafted on these rootstocks was higher than for rootstock Mazzard. Significant differences of the concentration of the elements were found for Fe, Cu, Zn in fruit and for Fe, Cu and Cr in leaves. Presence of Pb and Cr was not detected in sweet cherry fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mahaleb biotypes significantly decreased cherry trunk cross-sectional area and crown volume.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Mahaleb cherry biotypese0
Outcome
trunk cross-sectional area and the crown volumee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Mahaleb cherry biotypes significantly decreased the trunk cross-sectional area and the crown volume of the trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
t1

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mahaleb-grafted cultivars had more flowers.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Mahaleb cherry biotypes No. 2 and No. 6e0
Outcome
flowerse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivars grafted on Mahaleb cherry biotypes No. 2 and No. 6 had more flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
t1

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mahaleb-grafted cultivars gave higher yield.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Mahaleb cherry biotypes No. 2 and No. 6e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivars grafted on Mahaleb cherry biotypes No. 2 and No. 6 had more flowers and they gave a higher yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
t1

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield efficiency on Mahaleb rootstocks exceeded Mazzard.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
these rootstockse0
Outcome
yield efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Mazzarde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield efficiency for cultivars grafted on these rootstocks was higher than for rootstock Mazzard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
t1

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit Fe, Cu, and Zn concentrations differed significantly among rootstocks.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
concentration of the elementse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences of the concentration of the elements were found for Fe, Cu, Zn in fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
t1

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Fe, Cu, and Cr concentrations differed significantly among rootstocks.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
Fe, Cu and Cr in leavese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for Fe, Cu and Cr in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
t1

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pb and Cr were undetected in sweet cherry fruit.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
Presence of Pb and Cr was not detected in sweet cherry fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Presence of Pb and Cr was not detected in sweet cherry fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1105 · show in text ↑

Prunus mahaleb · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

grafting · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.