Abstract
This study was carried out in order to determine the effect of rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6, MaxMa 14 and SL 64) on performance of sweet cherry cultivar ‘0 900 Ziraat’ during 2010-2013 years. The trail in randomized block design was established as to factorial design. Each graft combination included 20 trees. The trees was trained as Spanish Bush training system. At the end of study, effect of rootstocks on vegetative growth was found significant. It has been determined that the trees grafted on SL 64 and MaxMa 14 rootstocks were more vigorous than the those grafted on Gisela 5 and Gisela 6. The rootstocks formed significant differences at the precocity. While the first blooming on the trees grafted on Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 rootstocks occurred at the second year after planting, the first blooming on the trees on MaxMa 14 and SL 64 rootstocks occurred at fourth year after planting. It has been determined that occur significant differences on yield per tree and yield efficiency among rootstocks. In terms of yield per tree and yield efficiency, While the lowest value was in SL 64 rootstock, the highest value was recorded in Gisela 5, and it has been determined that the differences between three rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6 and MaxMa 14) were not significant. While fruits weight varied according to the rootstock used in study, the trees grafted on Gisela 5 had the smallest fruit. Accompanied with differences between MaxMa 14 and SL 64 rootstocks were not significant, the biggest fruits were produced on trees grafted on SL 64 rootstock. As a result of the statistical analysis, it has determined that the rootstocks that used in trial did not create significant differences on soluble solids content (SSC) value. One of the most significant diagnosis was 6 % mortality rate that occurred on trees grafted Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 rootstocks.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
SL 64 and MaxMa 14 produced more vigorous trees than Gisela 5 and Gisela 6.
- Taxon
- Sweet Cherry
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- SL 64 and MaxMa 14 rootstockse0
- Outcome
- vigorouse0
- Direction
- more vigorouse0
- Comparator
- Gisela 5 and Gisela 6e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the trees grafted on SL 64 and MaxMa 14 rootstocks were more vigorous than the those grafted on Gisela 5 and Gisela 6”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Gisela 5 trees first bloomed in the second year after planting.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Gisela 5e0
- Outcome
- first bloominge0
- Value
- second year after plantinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the first blooming on the trees grafted on Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 rootstocks occurred at the second year after planting”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Gisela 6 trees first bloomed in the second year after planting.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Gisela 6e0
- Outcome
- first bloominge0
- Value
- second year after plantinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the first blooming on the trees grafted on Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 rootstocks occurred at the second year after planting”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
MaxMa 14 trees first bloomed in the fourth year after planting.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- MaxMa 14e0
- Outcome
- first bloominge0
- Value
- fourth year after plantinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the first blooming on the trees on MaxMa 14 and SL 64 rootstocks occurred at fourth year after planting”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
SL 64 trees first bloomed in the fourth year after planting.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- SL 64e0
- Outcome
- first bloominge0
- Value
- fourth year after plantinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the first blooming on the trees on MaxMa 14 and SL 64 rootstocks occurred at fourth year after planting”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
SL 64 had the lowest yield per tree and yield efficiency.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- SL 64 rootstocke0
- Outcome
- yield per tree and yield efficiencye0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Comparator
- Gisela 5e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In terms of yield per tree and yield efficiency, While the lowest value was in SL 64 rootstock, the highest value was recorded in Gisela 5”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Gisela 5 had the highest yield per tree and yield efficiency.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Gisela 5e0
- Outcome
- yield per tree and yield efficiencye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- SL 64 rootstocke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In terms of yield per tree and yield efficiency, While the lowest value was in SL 64 rootstock, the highest value was recorded in Gisela 5”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield differences among Gisela 5, Gisela 6 and MaxMa 14 were not significant.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Outcome
- differences between three rootstockse0
- Qualifier
- Gisela 5, Gisela 6 and MaxMa 14e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the differences between three rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6 and MaxMa 14) were not significant”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Gisela 5 produced the smallest fruit.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Gisela 5e0
- Outcome
- fruite0
- Direction
- smalleste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the trees grafted on Gisela 5 had the smallest fruit”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
SL 64 produced the biggest fruit.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- SL 64 rootstocke0
- Outcome
- fruitse0
- Direction
- biggeste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the biggest fruits were produced on trees grafted on SL 64 rootstock”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
MaxMa 14 and SL 64 did not differ significantly in fruit weight.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Outcome
- differencese0
- Qualifier
- MaxMa 14 and SL 64 rootstockse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“differences between MaxMa 14 and SL 64 rootstocks were not significant”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstocks did not cause significant differences in soluble solids content.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- soluble solids content (SSC) valuee0
- Direction
- did not create significant differencese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the rootstocks that used in trial did not create significant differences on soluble solids content (SSC) value”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Gisela 5 trees had 6% mortality.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Gisela 5e0
- Outcome
- mortality ratee0
- Value
- 6 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“6 % mortality rate that occurred on trees grafted Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 rootstocks”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Gisela 6 trees had 6% mortality.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Gisela 6e0
- Outcome
- mortality ratee0
- Value
- 6 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“6 % mortality rate that occurred on trees grafted Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 rootstocks”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · molecular: metabolites · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
grafting · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.