Paper · 1988 · HortScience

Economic Evaluation of Different Cultural Systems for Muskmelon Production

D. Berle; E. A. Estes; D. C. Sanders; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Sixteen management systems for early muskmelon production were compared for marketable yield, gross revenue, treatment cost, net economic value, and benefit-cost index. Black plastic mulch and/or transplants increased yields, gross return, and net economic value over a conventional practice of bare soil, direct-seeded production. Row covers did not increase yields or gross returns. When net economic value and benefit cost criteria were evaluated, yield maximization was not necessarily the best strategy. Instead, careful analysis should be given to added costs of production practices and the added revenue these practices will generate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black plastic mulch and/or transplants increased marketable yield relative to bare-soil direct seeding.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Black plastic mulch and/or transplantse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
bare soil, direct-seeded productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Black plastic mulch and/or transplants increased yields, gross return, and net economic value over a conventional practice of bare soil, direct-seeded production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–340 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black plastic mulch and/or transplants increased gross return and net economic value.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Black plastic mulch and/or transplantse0
Outcome
gross return, and net economic valuee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
bare soil, direct-seeded productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Black plastic mulch and/or transplants increased yields, gross return, and net economic value over a conventional practice of bare soil, direct-seeded production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–340 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row covers did not increase yield or gross returns.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Row coverse0
Outcome
yields or gross returnse0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row covers did not increase yields or gross returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–393 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximizing yield did not necessarily maximize net economic value or benefit-cost performance.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Outcome
yield maximization was not necessarily the best strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When net economic value and benefit cost criteria were evaluated, yield maximization was not necessarily the best strategy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–517 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise analyzing the added cost and revenue of production practices.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Outcome
careful analysis should be given to added costs of production practices and the added revenuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Instead, careful analysis should be given to added costs of production practices and the added revenue these practices will generate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

transplanting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

mulching · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 37 positive, 7 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.