Paper · 1999

Insect pest incidence on cowpea in the Cameroonian Southwest forest and Western derived savanna zones, their contribution to yield loss in foumbot and their control

I.A. Parh

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In 1986 and 1987, insect pests sampled on cowpea in the Cameroonian Southwest forest and Western derived savanna ecological zones included Maruca vitrata, Leguminivora (Cydia) ptychora, Helicoverpa (Heliothis) armigera, Melanagromyza vignalis, Apion disjunctum, Aphis craccivora, heteropteran bugs and bruchids. Under eight different deltamethrin spray schedules evaluated for their control at Foumbot, western derived savanna ecozone, the yield loss they caused ranged from 123.60 kg per ha in plants sprayed twice at the reproductive stage to 362.51 kg per ha in unsprayed plants in 1988; 21.86 kg per ha in plants sprayed three times at the reproductive stage to 90.73 kg per ha in unsprayed plants in 1989 and 91.72 kg per ha in plants sprayed 5 to 6 times at fortnightly intervals, to 184.08 kg per ha in unsprayed plants in 1990. The percentage loss due to Maruca vitrata, Melanagromyza vignalis and heteropteran bugs was high in sprayed and unsprayed plots. In 1989 and 1990, seed yields were significantly increased by spraying deltamethrin either forthnightly, or once at 75-100/ flowerbuds and once at 75-100/ podding, or once at 75-100/ flowering and once at 75-100/ podding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight pest groups were found on cowpea in the two Cameroonian zones.

Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae0pest
Second interactor
Melanagromyza vignalisMelanagromyza vignalise0pest
Outcome
insect pests sampled on cowpeae0
Qualifier
Maruca vitrata, Leguminivora (Cydia) ptychora, Helicoverpa (Heliothis) armigera, Melanagromyza vignalis, Apion disjunctum, Aphis craccivora, heteropteran bugs and bruchidse0
Setting
Cameroonian Southwest forest and Western derived savanna ecological zonese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“insect pests sampled on cowpea in the Cameroonian Southwest forest and Western derived savanna ecological zones included Maruca vitrata, Leguminivora (Cydia) ptychora, Helicoverpa (Heliothis) armigera, Melanagromyza vignalis, Apion disjunctum, Aphis craccivora, heteropteran bugs and bruchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–310 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1988 pest yield loss was 123.60 kg per ha with two reproductive sprays.

Treatment
sprayed twice at the reproductive stagee0
Outcome
yield losse0
Value
123.60 kg per hae0
Qualifier
1988e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield loss they caused ranged from 123.60 kg per ha in plants sprayed twice at the reproductive stage to 362.51 kg per ha in unsprayed plants in 1988”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“insect pests sampled on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1988 unsprayed plants lost 362.51 kg per ha of yield.

Treatment
unsprayed plantse0
Outcome
yield losse0
Value
362.51 kg per hae0
Qualifier
1988e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield loss they caused ranged from 123.60 kg per ha in plants sprayed twice at the reproductive stage to 362.51 kg per ha in unsprayed plants in 1988”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“insect pests sampled on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1989 pest yield loss was 21.86 kg per ha with three reproductive sprays.

Treatment
sprayed three times at the reproductive stagee0
Outcome
yield losse1
Value
21.86 kg per hae0
Qualifier
1989e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“21.86 kg per ha in plants sprayed three times at the reproductive stage to 90.73 kg per ha in unsprayed plants in 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield loss they caused”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“insect pests sampled on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1989 unsprayed plants lost 90.73 kg per ha of yield.

Treatment
unsprayed plantse0
Outcome
yield losse1
Value
90.73 kg per hae0
Qualifier
1989e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“21.86 kg per ha in plants sprayed three times at the reproductive stage to 90.73 kg per ha in unsprayed plants in 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield loss they caused”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“insect pests sampled on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1990 pest yield loss was 91.72 kg per ha with five to six fortnightly sprays.

Treatment
sprayed 5 to 6 times at fortnightly intervalse0
Outcome
yield losse1
Value
91.72 kg per hae0
Qualifier
1990e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“91.72 kg per ha in plants sprayed 5 to 6 times at fortnightly intervals, to 184.08 kg per ha in unsprayed plants in 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–834 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield loss they caused”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“insect pests sampled on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1990 unsprayed plants lost 184.08 kg per ha of yield.

Treatment
unsprayed plantse0
Outcome
yield losse1
Value
184.08 kg per hae0
Qualifier
1990e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“91.72 kg per ha in plants sprayed 5 to 6 times at fortnightly intervals, to 184.08 kg per ha in unsprayed plants in 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–834 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield loss they caused”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“insect pests sampled on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maruca vitrata contributed high percentage loss in sprayed and unsprayed plots.

Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae0pest
Outcome
percentage loss due to Maruca vitratae0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
sprayed and unsprayed plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage loss due to Maruca vitrata, Melanagromyza vignalis and heteropteran bugs was high in sprayed and unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“insect pests sampled on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melanagromyza vignalis contributed high percentage loss in sprayed and unsprayed plots.

Interactor
Melanagromyza vignalisMelanagromyza vignalise0pest
Outcome
percentage losse0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
sprayed and unsprayed plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage loss due to Maruca vitrata, Melanagromyza vignalis and heteropteran bugs was high in sprayed and unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“insect pests sampled on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heteropteran bugs contributed high percentage loss in sprayed and unsprayed plots.

Interactor
heteropteran bugse0pest
Outcome
percentage losse0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
sprayed and unsprayed plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage loss due to Maruca vitrata, Melanagromyza vignalis and heteropteran bugs was high in sprayed and unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“insect pests sampled on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fortnightly deltamethrin spraying significantly increased seed yield.

Treatment
spraying deltamethrin either forthnightlye0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yields were significantly increased by spraying deltamethrin either forthnightly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1068 · show in text ↑
e1

“insect pests sampled on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deltamethrin at flowerbud and podding stages significantly increased seed yield.

Treatment
once at 75-100/ flowerbuds and once at 75-100/ poddinge0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yields were significantly increased by spraying deltamethrin either forthnightly, or once at 75-100/ flowerbuds and once at 75-100/ podding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1127 · show in text ↑
e1

“insect pests sampled on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deltamethrin at flowering and podding stages significantly increased seed yield.

Treatment
once at 75-100/ flowering and once at 75-100/ poddinge0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yields were significantly increased by spraying deltamethrin either forthnightly, or once at 75-100/ flowerbuds and once at 75-100/ podding, or once at 75-100/ flowering and once at 75-100/ podding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1185 · show in text ↑
e1

“insect pests sampled on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–48 · show in text ↑

deltamethrin · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

stage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 18 positive, 8 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 112 positive, 14 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.