Paper · 2016 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Irrigation dose and plant density affect the volatile composition and sensory quality of dill (Anethum graveolens L.)

Hussein El‐Zaeddi; Juan Martínez‐Tomé; Ángel Calín‐Sánchez; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Two independent field experiments were carried out to investigate the influence of (i) three irrigation treatments ( ID0 = 1585 m 3 ha −1 , considered as a control; ID1 = 1015 m 3 ha −1 ; and ID2 = 2180 m 3 ha −1 ) and (ii) three plant density treatments ( PD0 = 5.56 plants m −2 , considered as a control; PD1 = 4.44 plants m −2 ; and PD2 = 7.41 plants m −2 ) on the production, volatile composition of essential oil, and sensory quality of dill. RESULTS The highest plant yield was obtained with intermediate conditions of both irrigation dose ( ID0 ) and plant density ( PD0 ). The main compounds of the essential oil were α ‐phellandrene, dill ether and β ‐phellandrene. The highest irrigation dose ( ID2 ) produced the highest concentrations of most of the main compounds: α ‐phellandrene (49.5 mg per 100 g), β ‐phellandrene (6.89 mg per 100 g) and limonene (2.49 mg per 100 g). A similar pattern was found for the highest plant density ( PD2 ): α ‐phellandrene (71.0 mg per 100 g), dill ether (16.7 mg per 100 g) and β ‐phellandrene (9.70 mg per 100 g). The use of descriptive sensory analysis helped in reaching a final decision, and the dill plants with the highest sensory quality were those of the ID2 and PD0 treatments. CONCLUSION The final recommendation is to use the irrigation dose ID2 and the plant density PD2 if the objective is to produce dill samples with the highest aromatic and sensory quality; however, if the only objective is to produce high amounts of dill, the best options are ID0 and PD0 . © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermediate irrigation dose ( ID0 ) gave the highest plant yield.

Treatment
irrigation dose ( ID0 )e0
Outcome
plant yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest plant yield was obtained with intermediate conditions of both irrigation dose ( ID0 ) and plant density ( PD0 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermediate plant density ( PD0 ) gave the highest plant yield.

Treatment
plant density ( PD0 )e0
Outcome
plant yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest plant yield was obtained with intermediate conditions of both irrigation dose ( ID0 ) and plant density ( PD0 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The principal essential-oil compounds were α-phellandrene, dill ether and β-phellandrene.

Outcome
main compounds of the essential oile0
Qualifier
α ‐phellandrene, dill ether and β ‐phellandrenee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main compounds of the essential oil were α ‐phellandrene, dill ether and β ‐phellandrene.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest irrigation dose produced the highest concentration of α ‐phellandrene.

Treatment
ID2e0
Outcome
α ‐phellandrenee0
Direction
highest concentrationse0
Value
49.5 mg per 100 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest irrigation dose ( ID2 ) produced the highest concentrations of most of the main compounds: α ‐phellandrene (49.5 mg per 100 g), β ‐phellandrene (6.89 mg per 100 g) and limonene (2.49 mg per 100 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest irrigation dose produced the highest concentration of β ‐phellandrene.

Treatment
ID2e0
Outcome
β ‐phellandrenee0
Direction
highest concentrationse0
Value
6.89 mg per 100 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest irrigation dose ( ID2 ) produced the highest concentrations of most of the main compounds: α ‐phellandrene (49.5 mg per 100 g), β ‐phellandrene (6.89 mg per 100 g) and limonene (2.49 mg per 100 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest irrigation dose produced the highest concentration of limonene.

Treatment
ID2e0
Outcome
limonenee0
Direction
highest concentrationse0
Value
2.49 mg per 100 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest irrigation dose ( ID2 ) produced the highest concentrations of most of the main compounds: α ‐phellandrene (49.5 mg per 100 g), β ‐phellandrene (6.89 mg per 100 g) and limonene (2.49 mg per 100 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest plant density yielded 71.0 mg per 100 g of α ‐phellandrene.

Treatment
PD2e0
Outcome
α ‐phellandrenee0
Value
71.0 mg per 100 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A similar pattern was found for the highest plant density ( PD2 ): α ‐phellandrene (71.0 mg per 100 g), dill ether (16.7 mg per 100 g) and β ‐phellandrene (9.70 mg per 100 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest plant density yielded 16.7 mg per 100 g of dill ether.

Treatment
PD2e0
Outcome
dill ethere0
Value
16.7 mg per 100 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A similar pattern was found for the highest plant density ( PD2 ): α ‐phellandrene (71.0 mg per 100 g), dill ether (16.7 mg per 100 g) and β ‐phellandrene (9.70 mg per 100 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest plant density yielded 9.70 mg per 100 g of β ‐phellandrene.

Treatment
PD2e0
Outcome
β ‐phellandrenee0
Value
9.70 mg per 100 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A similar pattern was found for the highest plant density ( PD2 ): α ‐phellandrene (71.0 mg per 100 g), dill ether (16.7 mg per 100 g) and β ‐phellandrene (9.70 mg per 100 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ID2 produced the highest sensory quality.

Treatment
ID2e0
Outcome
sensory qualitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dill plants with the highest sensory quality were those of the ID2 and PD0 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PD0 produced the highest sensory quality.

Treatment
PD0e0
Outcome
sensory qualitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dill plants with the highest sensory quality were those of the ID2 and PD0 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend ID2 to highest aromatic and sensory quality.

Treatment
ID2e0
Outcome
highest aromatic and sensory qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The final recommendation is to use the irrigation dose ID2 and the plant density PD2 if the objective is to produce dill samples with the highest aromatic and sensory quality; however, if the only objective is to produce high amounts of dill, the best options are ID0 and PD0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend PD2 to highest aromatic and sensory quality.

Treatment
PD2e0
Outcome
highest aromatic and sensory qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The final recommendation is to use the irrigation dose ID2 and the plant density PD2 if the objective is to produce dill samples with the highest aromatic and sensory quality; however, if the only objective is to produce high amounts of dill, the best options are ID0 and PD0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend ID0 to produce high amounts of dill.

Treatment
ID0e0
Outcome
produce high amounts of dille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The final recommendation is to use the irrigation dose ID2 and the plant density PD2 if the objective is to produce dill samples with the highest aromatic and sensory quality; however, if the only objective is to produce high amounts of dill, the best options are ID0 and PD0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend PD0 to produce high amounts of dill.

Treatment
PD0e0
Outcome
produce high amounts of dille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The final recommendation is to use the irrigation dose ID2 and the plant density PD2 if the objective is to produce dill samples with the highest aromatic and sensory quality; however, if the only objective is to produce high amounts of dill, the best options are ID0 and PD0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–117 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · yield · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.