Paper · 2016 · International Journal of Phytoremediation

Effects of different sewage sludge applications on heavy metal accumulation, growth and yield of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)

Ebrahem M. Eid; Ahmed F. El-Bebany; Sulaiman A. Alrumman; et al.

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
68
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, we present the response of spinach to different amendment rates of sewage sludge (0, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 g kg−1) in a greenhouse pot experiment, where plant growth, biomass and heavy metal uptake were measured. The results showed that sewage sludge application increased soil electric conductivity (EC), organic matter, chromium and zinc concentrations and decreased soil pH. All heavy metal concentrations of the sewage sludge were below the permissible limits for land application of sewage sludge recommended by the Council of the European Communities. Biomass and all growth parameters (except the shoot/root ratio) of spinach showed a positive response to sewage sludge applications up to 40 g kg−1 compared to the control soil. Increasing the sewage sludge amendment rate caused an increase in all heavy metal concentrations (except lead) in spinach root and shoot. However, all heavy metal concentrations (except chromium and iron) were in the normal range and did not reach the phytotoxic levels. The spinach was characterized by a bioaccumulation factor <1.0 for all heavy metals. The translocation factor (TF) varied among the heavy metals as well as among the sewage sludge amendment rates. Spinach translocation mechanisms clearly restricted heavy metal transport to the edible parts (shoot) because the TFs for all heavy metals (except zinc) were <1.0. In conclusion, sewage sludge used in the present study can be considered for use as a fertilizer in spinach production systems in Saudi Arabia, and the results can serve as a management method for sewage sludge.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge increased soil electrical conductivity, organic matter, chromium and zinc and decreased soil pH.

Treatment
sewage sludge applicatione0
Outcome
soil electric conductivity (EC), organic matter, chromium and zinc concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sewage sludge application increased soil electric conductivity (EC), organic matter, chromium and zinc concentrations and decreased soil pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge decreased soil pH.

Treatment
sewage sludge applicatione0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sewage sludge application increased soil electric conductivity (EC), organic matter, chromium and zinc concentrations and decreased soil pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy metal concentrations in sewage sludge were below permissible land application limits.

Outcome
heavy metal concentrations of the sewage sludgee0
Direction
belowe0
Comparator
permissible limitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All heavy metal concentrations of the sewage sludge were below the permissible limits for land application of sewage sludge recommended by the Council of the European Communities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach biomass and growth parameters other than shoot/root ratio increased with sludge up to 40 g kg−1 versus control soil.

Treatment
sewage sludge applications up to 40 g kg−1e0
Outcome
Biomass and all growth parameters (except the shoot/root ratio)e0
Direction
positive responsee0
Comparator
control soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass and all growth parameters (except the shoot/root ratio) of spinach showed a positive response to sewage sludge applications up to 40 g kg−1 compared to the control soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–750 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sludge application raised all heavy metal concentrations except lead in spinach roots and shoots.

Organ / stage
root and shoote0
Treatment
sewage sludge amendment ratee0
Outcome
all heavy metal concentrations (except lead)e0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the sewage sludge amendment rate caused an increase in all heavy metal concentrations (except lead) in spinach root and shoot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–888 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All measured heavy metals except chromium and iron were in the normal range and below phytotoxic levels.

Outcome
heavy metal concentrations (except chromium and iron)e0
Direction
did not reache0
Comparator
phytotoxic levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all heavy metal concentrations (except chromium and iron) were in the normal range and did not reach the phytotoxic levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach bioaccumulation factor was below 1.0 for all heavy metals.

Outcome
bioaccumulation factore0
Value
<1.0e0
Qualifier
for all heavy metalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spinach was characterized by a bioaccumulation factor <1.0 for all heavy metals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The translocation factor varied across heavy metals and sludge amendment rates.

Treatment
sewage sludge amendment ratese0
Outcome
translocation factor (TF)e0
Qualifier
heavy metalse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The translocation factor (TF) varied among the heavy metals as well as among the sewage sludge amendment rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The translocation factor for all heavy metals except zinc was below 1.0, indicating restricted transport to spinach shoots.

Organ / stage
shoote0
Outcome
TFs for all heavy metals (except zinc)e0
Direction
restrictede0
Value
<1.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinach translocation mechanisms clearly restricted heavy metal transport to the edible parts (shoot) because the TFs for all heavy metals (except zinc) were <1.0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1382 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend considering this sewage sludge as fertilizer for spinach production in Saudi Arabia.

Treatment
sewage sludgee0
Outcome
use as a fertilizer in spinach production systemse0
Setting
Saudi Arabiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sewage sludge used in the present study can be considered for use as a fertilizer in spinach production systems in Saudi Arabia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1525 · show in text ↑

organic · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.