Paper · 2016 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Gas exchange, growth and yield of cowpea genotypes under different irrigation strategies

Carantino Lucena Moreira R ocirc mulo; Eric Barbosa Brito Marcos; Cleiton Fernandes de Queiroga Roberto; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water availability is a major limiting factor for cowpea bean crops, especially in semiarid regions, where it is necessary to adopt more productive and tolerant genotypes and efficient strategies for water use. Thus, an experiment was carried under field conditions in the semiarid region of Pombal city, PB, Brazil. Using a completely randomised blocks design experiment and four replications, in a factorial scheme. The first factor was formed by four cowpea beans genotypes (Costela de Vaca, Pingo-de-Ouro, Paulistinha and BRS Marataoã), and the second factor consisted of five different irrigation strategies (40, 60, 80, 100 and 120% of actual evapotranspiration (ETr)). Gas exchange was evaluated at the V4 stage, dry biomatter formation at the R2 stage and crop yield until 90 days after sowing. The gas exchange from cowpea genotypes was reduced by lower irrigation amounts. For dry biomass formation, greater values in the Pingo-de-Ouro genotype were observed when irrigated with 120% of ETr. Thus, the treatment of 120% ETr improved the growth in dry matter independently of the genotype. The Costela de Vaca genotype had better CO2 assimilation rates. Paulistinha had the highest productivity among genotypes, and Costela de Vaca had the greatest water use efficiency. Key words: Assimilation rate, Vigna unguiculata, water productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower irrigation amounts reduced gas exchange in cowpea genotypes.

Treatment
lower irrigation amountse0
Outcome
gas exchangee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The gas exchange from cowpea genotypes was reduced by lower irrigation amounts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pingo-de-Ouro had greater dry biomass formation when irrigated at 120% ETr.

Material
Pingo-de-Ouroe0
Treatment
120% of ETre0
Outcome
dry biomass formatione0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For dry biomass formation, greater values in the Pingo-de-Ouro genotype were observed when irrigated with 120% of ETr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 120% ETr improved cowpea dry matter growth regardless of genotype.

Treatment
120% ETre0
Outcome
growth in dry mattere0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
independently of the genotypee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of 120% ETr improved the growth in dry matter independently of the genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Costela de Vaca had better CO2 assimilation rates among cowpea genotypes.

Material
Costela de Vacae0
Outcome
CO2 assimilation ratese0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Costela de Vaca genotype had better CO2 assimilation rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paulistinha had the highest productivity among cowpea genotypes.

Material
Paulistinhae0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paulistinha had the highest productivity among genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Costela de Vaca had the greatest water use efficiency among cowpea genotypes.

Material
Costela de Vacae0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Costela de Vaca had the greatest water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: gas exchange · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.