Paper · 2016 · International Journal Of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

Recycling of sugarcane industries byproducts for preparation of enriched pressmud compost and its influence on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.)

D. Kalaivanan; K. Omar Hattab

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Purpose Field experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of enriched pressmud compost prepared from sugarcane industries byproducts on soil nutrient availability, growth, yield parameters and yield of rice. Method The effect of five levels of pressmud compost, viz., 0.00, 1.25, 2.50, 3.75 and 5.00 t ha-1 in two varieties, viz., ADT 36 and ADT 43 and a hybrid ADTRH 1 duringthe Kharif season of 2009 was studied. The experiment was conducted in a factorial randomized block design with three replications. Results The results of the field experiment revealed that the hybrid ADTRH 1 manifested higher grain and straw yield, whereas the variety ADT 43 and ADT 36 registered lower grain and straw yields, respectively. With regard to the enriched pressmud compost, the application of 1.25 t ha-1 of enriched pressmud compost recorded higher straw and grain yields and it was comparable with 2.50 t ha-1 of enriched pressmud compost. Nutrient availability, growth, yield and efficiency parameters of rice were comparable with application of 1.25 and 2.50 t ha-1 of enriched pressmud compost. Conclusion Considering the input cost, incorporation of 1.25 t ha-1 enriched pressmud compost as basal along with required remaining nitrogen through inorganic fertilizer as top dressing in three splits may be recommended for rice crop to realize maximum yield in kuruvai (kharif) season

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid ADTRH 1 had higher grain and straw yields than the varieties.

Material
ADTRH 1e0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ADT 43 and ADT 36e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–153 · show in text ↑
e0

“the hybrid ADTRH 1 manifested higher grain and straw yield, whereas the variety ADT 43 and ADT 36 registered lower grain and straw yields, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–724 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ADT 43 had lower grain yield.

Material
ADT 43e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–153 · show in text ↑
e0

“the variety ADT 43 and ADT 36 registered lower grain and straw yields, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–724 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ADT 36 had lower straw yield.

Material
ADT 36e0
Outcome
straw yieldse0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–153 · show in text ↑
e0

“the variety ADT 43 and ADT 36 registered lower grain and straw yields, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 1.25 t ha-1 enriched pressmud compost gave higher straw and grain yields, comparable to the 2.50 t ha-1 dose.

Treatment
1.25 t ha-1 of enriched pressmud composte0
Outcome
straw and grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
2.50 t ha-1 of enriched pressmud composte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–153 · show in text ↑
e0

“the application of 1.25 t ha-1 of enriched pressmud compost recorded higher straw and grain yields and it was comparable with 2.50 t ha-1 of enriched pressmud compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient availability, growth, yield and efficiency parameters were comparable under 1.25 and 2.50 t ha-1 compost.

Treatment
1.25e0
Outcome
Nutrient availability, growth, yield and efficiency parameterse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
2.50 t ha-1 of enriched pressmud composte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–153 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nutrient availability, growth, yield and efficiency parameters of rice were comparable with application of 1.25 and 2.50 t ha-1 of enriched pressmud compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1096 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend basal incorporation of 1.25 t ha-1 compost with remaining nitrogen top dressed in three splits for maximum rice yield in kuruvai season.

Outcome
incorporation of 1.25 t ha-1 enriched pressmud compost as basal along with required remaining nitrogen through inorganic fertilizer as top dressing in three splitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–153 · show in text ↑
e0

“incorporation of 1.25 t ha-1 enriched pressmud compost as basal along with required remaining nitrogen through inorganic fertilizer as top dressing in three splits may be recommended for rice crop to realize maximum yield in kuruvai (kharif) season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1385 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.