Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology

Integrated Management of Garli c White Rot (Sclerotium cepivorum Berk)Using Some Fungicides and Antifungal Trichoderma Species

Chemeda Dilbo

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

White rot (Sclerotium cepivorum Berk), is one of the most destructive soil borne pathogens that pose significant threat to production of garlic and other Allium species in Ethiopia and all over the world. Since most of the conventional control methods are not effective, the development of eco-friendly and cost effective integrated management method is critically required. A study was then conducted with completely randomized design and three replications that consist of all possible combinations of 31 treatments. The study was conducted during 2013/14 under greenhouse condition with the objective of evaluating the effect of two fungicides, Apron Star 42 WS and Tebuconazole, and in combination with four Trichoderma species namely T. hamatum, T. harzianum, T. oblongisporum and T. viride. The results of this study revealed that the efficacy of both fungicides, when tested alone, against S. cepivorum was lower than those treated with Trichoderma spp. alone and the fungicide combined treatments. Among all treatments, T16 (Apron Star 42 WS fungicide combined with T. hamatum and T. viride) has provided the best antagonistic activity against S. cepivorum with no disease incidence, followed by T. viride (T8) alone and Tebuconazole combined with T. hamtum (T21) (both 11.1% incidence). This was well correlated to the level of foliar, stem base and bulb rots symptoms as well as to plant growth and biomass of garlic plant parts. The results suggested that integration of fungicides and Trichoderma species is better than applying them alone, which could be attributed to the synergistic and additive growth promoting effects of combined treatments besides controlling the disease. This integrated approach appears to be the first report in Ethiopia, which has never been tested before.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efficacy of both fungicides tested alone against S. cepivorum was lower than that of Trichoderma spp. alone.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume1
Treatment
both fungicides, when tested alonee0
Interactor
S. cepivorumStromatinia cepivorae0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma spp.Trichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Trichoderma spp. alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the efficacy of both fungicides, when tested alone, against S. cepivorum was lower than those treated with Trichoderma spp. alone and the fungicide combined treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“production of garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efficacy of both fungicides tested alone against S. cepivorum was lower than that of the fungicide combined treatments.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume1
Treatment
both fungicides, when tested alonee0
Interactor
S. cepivorumStromatinia cepivorae0pathogen
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the fungicide combined treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the efficacy of both fungicides, when tested alone, against S. cepivorum was lower than those treated with Trichoderma spp. alone and the fungicide combined treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“production of garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among all treatments, T16 (Apron Star 42 WS fungicide combined with T. hamatum and T. viride) gave the best antagonistic activity against S. cepivorum, with no disease incidence.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume1
Treatment
T16 (Apron Star 42 WS fungicide combined with T. hamatum and T. viride)e0
Interactor
S. cepivorumStromatinia cepivorae0pathogen
Outcome
antagonistic activitye0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
no disease incidencee0
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all treatments, T16 (Apron Star 42 WS fungicide combined with T. hamatum and T. viride) has provided the best antagonistic activity against S. cepivorum with no disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1190 · show in text ↑
e1

“production of garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. viride alone (T8) was associated with 11.1% disease incidence, following T16.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume1
Treatment
T. viride (T8) alonee0
Interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidencee0
Value
11.1%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by T. viride (T8) alone and Tebuconazole combined with T. hamtum (T21) (both 11.1% incidence)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1294 · show in text ↑
e1

“production of garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole combined with T. hamtum (T21) was associated with 11.1% disease incidence, following T16.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume1
Treatment
Tebuconazole combined with T. hamtum (T21)e0
Interactor
T. hamtume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidencee0
Value
11.1%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by T. viride (T8) alone and Tebuconazole combined with T. hamtum (T21) (both 11.1% incidence)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1294 · show in text ↑
e1

“production of garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonistic activity was well correlated with the level of foliar, stem base and bulb rot symptoms and with plant growth and biomass of garlic plant parts.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Outcome
well correlated to the level of foliar, stem base and bulb rots symptoms as well as to plant growth and biomasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was well correlated to the level of foliar, stem base and bulb rots symptoms as well as to plant growth and biomass of garlic plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that integrating fungicides with Trichoderma species is better than applying them alone.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume1
Treatment
integration of fungicides and Trichoderma speciese0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
applying them alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of fungicides and Trichoderma species is better than applying them alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1551 · show in text ↑
e1

“production of garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the benefit of combined treatments could be attributed to synergistic and additive growth promoting effects besides controlling the disease.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume1
Treatment
combined treatmentse0
Outcome
controlling the diseasee0
Qualifier
synergistic and additive growth promoting effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“synergistic and additive growth promoting effects of combined treatments besides controlling the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1690 · show in text ↑
e1

“production of garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑

tebuconazole · disease · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fungicide · Stromatinia cepivora · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.