Abstract
Real time contingency practices viz., selection of varieties, date of sowing, method of crop establishment, soil and moisture conservation practices were demonstrated in the Chikkamaranahalli cluster villages, Bengaluru rural district of Karnataka during 2011 to 2014. Selection of long duration variety (MR-1) for July sowing, medium duration (GPU-28) for August 1st fortnight and short duration (GPU-48) for August 2nd fort night performed better. In-situ conservation moisture through opening of conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea under finger millet + pigeonpea (8: 2) and groundnut + pigeonpea (8: 2) recorded significantly higher yields (2749 kg/ha and 1347 kg/ha, respectively) compared to farmers’ practice. Among different methods of establishment in finger millet, transplanting recorded significantly higher grain yield (2461 kg/ha) and sowing of finger millet using modified bullock drawn seed drill recorded significantly higher yield (2417 kg/ha) compared to conventional method of broadcasting.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
MR-1 performed better for July sowing.
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanae1 - Material
- MR-1e0
- Outcome
- performed bettere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Qualifier
- July sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“long duration variety (MR-1) for July sowing, medium duration (GPU-28) for August 1st fortnight and short duration (GPU-48) for August 2nd fort night performed better”
e1“finger millet + pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
GPU-28 performed better for sowing in the first half of August.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae1
- Material
- GPU-28e0
- Outcome
- performed bettere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Qualifier
- August 1st fortnighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“long duration variety (MR-1) for July sowing, medium duration (GPU-28) for August 1st fortnight and short duration (GPU-48) for August 2nd fort night performed better”
e1“finger millet + pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
GPU-48 performed better for sowing in the second half of August.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae1
- Material
- GPU-48e0
- Outcome
- performed bettere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Qualifier
- August 2nd fort nighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“long duration variety (MR-1) for July sowing, medium duration (GPU-28) for August 1st fortnight and short duration (GPU-48) for August 2nd fort night performed better”
e1“finger millet + pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation furrows in finger millet plus pigeonpea yielded 2749 kg/ha, significantly above farmers’ practice.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- opening of conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea under finger millet + pigeonpea (8: 2)e0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2749 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- farmers’ practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“opening of conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea under finger millet + pigeonpea (8: 2) and groundnut + pigeonpea (8: 2) recorded significantly higher yields (2749 kg/ha and 1347 kg/ha, respectively) compared to farmers’ practice”
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation furrows in groundnut plus pigeonpea yielded 1347 kg/ha, significantly above farmers’ practice.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- opening of conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpeae0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1347 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- groundnut + pigeonpea (8: 2)e0
- Comparator
- farmers’ practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“opening of conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea under finger millet + pigeonpea (8: 2) and groundnut + pigeonpea (8: 2) recorded significantly higher yields (2749 kg/ha and 1347 kg/ha, respectively) compared to farmers’ practice”
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet transplanting yielded 2461 kg/ha, significantly above broadcasting.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- transplantinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2461 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- conventional method of broadcastinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among different methods of establishment in finger millet, transplanting recorded significantly higher grain yield (2461 kg/ha) and sowing of finger millet using modified bullock drawn seed drill recorded significantly higher yield (2417 kg/ha) compared to conventional method of broadcasting”
Claim · model-written summary
Modified bullock drawn seed drill sowing yielded 2417 kg/ha, significantly above broadcasting.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- sowing of finger millet using modified bullock drawn seed drille0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2417 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- conventional method of broadcastinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sowing of finger millet using modified bullock drawn seed drill recorded significantly higher yield (2417 kg/ha) compared to conventional method of broadcasting”
The same questions in other papers
Cajanus cajan · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Cajanus cajan · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →irrigation · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →transplanting · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →irrigation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
167 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
187 papers more in this group
See all 191 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.