Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fingermillet intercropped with pigeonpea in 4:2 row ratio produced 77.7% higher fingermillet equivalent yield than broadcast sown fingermillet.

A claim from Intercropping in fingermillet (Eleusine coracana) with pulses for enhanced productivity, resource conservation and soil fertility in uplands of Southern Orissa. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fingermillet intercropped with pigeonpea in 4:2 row ratio produced 77.7% higher fingermillet equivalent yield than broadcast sown fingermillet.

Taxon
fingermilletEleusine coracanae1
Treatment
Fingermillet + pigeonpeae1
Outcome
fingermillet equivalent yield (FMEY)e1
Direction
highere1
Value
77.7%e1
Qualifier
4:2 row ratioe1
Comparator
broadcast sown fingermillete1
Setting
Kokriguda watershed, Koraput (Orissa)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment on diversification of fingermillet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) through blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.) and pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) intercropping was carried out for 3 years during 2001 - 2003 at Kokriguda watershed, Koraput (Orissa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–270
e1

“Fingermillet + pigeonpea and fingermillet + blackgram both in 4:2 row ratio produced 77.7% and 67.4% higher fingermillet equivalent yield (FMEY) over broadcast sown fingermillet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–556

Title

Intercropping in fingermillet (Eleusine coracana) with pulses for enhanced productivity, resource conservation and soil fertility in uplands of Southern Orissa.

Anchal Dass; S. Sudhishri Indian Journal of Agronomy 2010

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e5483af220691dc925b0edc4c5cd08a26ac8e70f6795c5b6f8cb64b930c9e3a6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Cajanus cajan · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.