Abstract
In rainfed and dry regions of southern Karnataka, sole cropping is not much remunerative in the present scenario of climate change in agriculture to fulfill the diverse demands of consumers and burgeoning population. Hence, studies on intercropping systems were conducted in Alanatha cluster of villages in Ramanagara district and Chikkamaranahalli cluster in Bengaluru Rural district from 2010 to 2014 as a part of Operational Research Project (ORP) and National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA). In both the locations, finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) + pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) (8:2) with moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea intercropping recorded higher yield and economics as compared to the farmers’ practices of growing finger millet with akkadi crops. In groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) based cropping, groundnut+ pigeonpea (8:2) intercropping with moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea proved to be the better climate resilient intercropping system with higher yields in red soils of southern Karnataka. Under pulse based cropping systems, pigeonpea + cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) and pigeonpea + field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were remunerative when grown in additive series compared to sole crop of pigeonpea.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet plus pigeonpea with a moisture conservation furrow had higher yield than farmers’ finger millet and akkadi crop practice.
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanae0 - Treatment
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) + pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) (8:2) with moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- farmers’ practices of growing finger millet with akkadi cropse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) + pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) (8:2) with moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea intercropping recorded higher yield and economics as compared to the farmers’ practices of growing finger millet with akkadi crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet plus pigeonpea with a moisture conservation furrow had better economics than farmers’ practice.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) + pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) (8:2) with moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- economicse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- farmers’ practices of growing finger millet with akkadi cropse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) + pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) (8:2) with moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea intercropping recorded higher yield and economics as compared to the farmers’ practices of growing finger millet with akkadi crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut plus pigeonpea with a moisture conservation furrow produced higher yields in southern Karnataka red soils.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- groundnut+ pigeonpea (8:2) intercropping with moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpeae0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Setting
- southern Karnatakae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) based cropping, groundnut+ pigeonpea (8:2) intercropping with moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea proved to be the better climate resilient intercropping system with higher yields in red soils of southern Karnataka”
Claim · model-written summary
The groundnut plus pigeonpea system was judged the better climate resilient intercropping system.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- groundnut+ pigeonpea (8:2) intercropping with moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpeae0
- Outcome
- better climate resilient intercropping systeme0
- Setting
- southern Karnatakae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) based cropping, groundnut+ pigeonpea (8:2) intercropping with moisture conservation furrow between paired rows of pigeonpea proved to be the better climate resilient intercropping system with higher yields in red soils of southern Karnataka”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea plus cowpea in additive series was remunerative compared with sole pigeonpea.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0 - Treatment
- pigeonpea + cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)e0
- Outcome
- remunerativee0
- Comparator
- sole crop of pigeonpeae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pigeonpea + cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) and pigeonpea + field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were remunerative when grown in additive series compared to sole crop of pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea plus field bean in additive series was remunerative compared with sole pigeonpea.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)e0
- Outcome
- remunerativee0
- Comparator
- sole crop of pigeonpeae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pigeonpea + cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) and pigeonpea + field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were remunerative when grown in additive series compared to sole crop of pigeonpea”
The same questions in other papers
Cajanus cajan · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Cajanus cajan · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →intercropping · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
115 papers more in this group
See all 119 papers →irrigation · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →intercropping · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →irrigation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
167 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
187 papers more in this group
See all 191 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.