Paper · 2016 · The Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences

BIO-CONTROL ACTIVITY OF BACTERIAL STRAINS ON POSTHARVEST PERFORMANCE OF Gladiolus L. HYBRIDS ‘MAMMOTH’

Iftikhar Ahmad; Muhammad Saleem; John M. Dole; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was carried out to elucidate the efficacy of different bacterial strains on controlling detrimental bacteria and on vase life extension of Gladiolus L. hybrids 'Mammoth'. In a preliminary study, three bacterial strains (Bacillus pumilus, Delftia acidovorans, and Herbasperillum sp.) were isolated from the vase solutions of cut Gladiolus, identified and cultured to obtain the bacteria to be used in the study. These isolated strains were compared with two strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens (PF-279 and PF-417). All tested strains produced similar vase life of cut gladiolus stems, which was also similar to that of stems placed in tap water. However, stems placed in solutions with PF-279 Pseudomonas fluorecsens resulted in highest water uptake, while the stems placed in solutions with higher concentrations of Herbasperillum sp. (10 or 20 mL L -1 ) had lowest water uptake. Cut stems require low pH for sustaining water uptake and vase life extension, but use of nutrient broth to culture bacteria increased initial solution pH, which resulted in early senescence of cut stems due to rapid bacterial growth, vascular occlusion due to embolisms and reduced stem hydraulic conductance compared to the stems placed in tap water (control). In summary, tested bacterial strains had no effect on controlling detrimental bacteria present in the vase solutions or vase life extension of cut gladiolus and cannot be used in organic floral preservatives for holding cut stems after harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested bacterial strains yielded similar vase life to tap-water controls.

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse0
Treatment
tested strainse0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
tap watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All tested strains produced similar vase life of cut gladiolus stems, which was also similar to that of stems placed in tap water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PF-279 Pseudomonas fluorecsens produced the highest cut-stem water uptake.

Taxon
stemse0
Treatment
solutions with PF-279 Pseudomonas fluorecsense0
Interactor
PF-279 Pseudomonas fluorecsense0other
Outcome
water uptakee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“However, stems placed in solutions with PF-279 Pseudomonas fluorecsens resulted in highest water uptake, while the stems placed in solutions with higher concentrations of Herbasperillum sp. (10 or 20 mL L -1 ) had lowest water uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher concentrations of Herbasperillum sp. produced the lowest cut-stem water uptake.

Taxon
stemse0
Treatment
higher concentrations of Herbasperillum sp. (10 or 20 mL L -1 )e0
Interactor
Herbasperillum sp.e0other
Outcome
water uptakee0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“However, stems placed in solutions with PF-279 Pseudomonas fluorecsens resulted in highest water uptake, while the stems placed in solutions with higher concentrations of Herbasperillum sp. (10 or 20 mL L -1 ) had lowest water uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient broth increased initial vase-solution pH.

Taxon
stemse0
Treatment
nutrient brothe0
Outcome
initial solution pHe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cut stems require low pH for sustaining water uptake and vase life extension, but use of nutrient broth to culture bacteria increased initial solution pH, which resulted in early senescence of cut stems due to rapid bacterial growth, vascular occlusion due to embolisms and reduced stem hydraulic conductance compared to the stems placed in tap water (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1248 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient broth led to early cut-stem senescence compared with tap water.

Taxon
stemse0
Treatment
nutrient brothe0
Outcome
early senescence of cut stemse0
Qualifier
rapid bacterial growth, vascular occlusion due to embolismse0

Verbatim

e0

“Cut stems require low pH for sustaining water uptake and vase life extension, but use of nutrient broth to culture bacteria increased initial solution pH, which resulted in early senescence of cut stems due to rapid bacterial growth, vascular occlusion due to embolisms and reduced stem hydraulic conductance compared to the stems placed in tap water (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient broth reduced cut-stem hydraulic conductance compared with tap water.

Taxon
stemse0
Treatment
nutrient brothe0
Outcome
stem hydraulic conductancee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
tap water (control)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Cut stems require low pH for sustaining water uptake and vase life extension, but use of nutrient broth to culture bacteria increased initial solution pH, which resulted in early senescence of cut stems due to rapid bacterial growth, vascular occlusion due to embolisms and reduced stem hydraulic conductance compared to the stems placed in tap water (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested bacterial strains did not control detrimental bacteria in gladiolus vase solutions.

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse0
Treatment
tested bacterial strainse0
Outcome
controlling detrimental bacteria present in the vase solutionse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In summary, tested bacterial strains had no effect on controlling detrimental bacteria present in the vase solutions or vase life extension of cut gladiolus and cannot be used in organic floral preservatives for holding cut stems after harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested bacterial strains did not extend vase life of cut gladiolus.

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse0
Treatment
tested bacterial strainse0
Outcome
vase life extensione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In summary, tested bacterial strains had no effect on controlling detrimental bacteria present in the vase solutions or vase life extension of cut gladiolus and cannot be used in organic floral preservatives for holding cut stems after harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1493 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The tested bacterial strains should not be used in organic floral preservatives for cut gladiolus.

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse0
Outcome
cannot be used in organic floral preservatives for holding cut stems after harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In summary, tested bacterial strains had no effect on controlling detrimental bacteria present in the vase solutions or vase life extension of cut gladiolus and cannot be used in organic floral preservatives for holding cut stems after harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1493 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: postharvest · GladiolusPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.