Paper · 2016 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Copper and zinc forms in soil fertilized with pig slurry in the bean crop

Marco A. Grohskopf; Juliano C. Correa; Paulo C. Cassol; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The application of pig slurry may have different influence on copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) dynamics in the soil compared with mineral fertilization. The aim of this research was to determine the different forms of Cu and Zn in soil and their uptake by bean plants in response to the application of mineral fertilizer and pig slurry (PS). The treatments were: mineral fertilizer (Cu and Zn oxides) and liquid pig slurry, at increasing rates (0/0, 1.7/6.0, 3.4/12.0 and 6.8/24.0 kg ha-1 Cu/Zn, respectively) applied in a Rhodic Kandiudox. PS increased the Cu content in soil in the exchangeable form, Fe oxides and residual, while the mineral fertilizer increased Cu contents in the fraction associated with soil organic matter. Soil Zn contents in the fractions available, exchangeable and SOM were highest under mineral fertilization, while in the soluble fraction the contents were highest under PS. The fertilizers had not impact on Cu and Zn contents associated with Al oxides, and these elements were mostly associated with Fe oxides in the soil. PS promoted the highest biomass production in shoots and roots of the bean plants, reflecting in the highest accumulation of Cu and Zn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pig slurry increased exchangeable soil Cu.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
PSe0
Outcome
Cu content in soil in the exchangeable forme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“PS increased the Cu content in soil in the exchangeable form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–603 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pig slurry increased soil Cu associated with Fe oxides.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
PSe0
Outcome
Cu content in soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“PS increased the Cu content in soil in the exchangeable form, Fe oxides and residual”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–627 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pig slurry increased residual soil Cu.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
PSe0
Outcome
Cu content in soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“PS increased the Cu content in soil in the exchangeable form, Fe oxides and residual”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–627 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer increased Cu associated with soil organic matter.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
mineral fertilizere0
Outcome
Cu contents in the fraction associated with soil organic mattere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the mineral fertilizer increased Cu contents in the fraction associated with soil organic matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available, exchangeable and SOM soil Zn fractions were highest under mineral fertilization.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
mineral fertilizatione0
Outcome
Soil Zn contents in the fractions available, exchangeable and SOMe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Soil Zn contents in the fractions available, exchangeable and SOM were highest under mineral fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble soil Zn was highest under pig slurry.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
PSe0
Outcome
contentse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in the soluble fraction the contents were highest under PS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers did not affect soil Cu and Zn associated with Al oxides.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
fertilizerse0
Outcome
Cu and Zn contents associated with Al oxidese0
Direction
not impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilizers had not impact on Cu and Zn contents associated with Al oxides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Cu and Zn were mostly associated with Fe oxides.

Taxon
beant0
Outcome
mostly associated with Fe oxides in the soile0

Verbatim

e0

“these elements were mostly associated with Fe oxides in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pig slurry produced the highest shoot and root biomass in bean plants.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
PSe0
Outcome
biomass production in shoots and rootse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“PS promoted the highest biomass production in shoots and roots of the bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pig slurry produced the highest Cu and Zn accumulation in bean plants.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
PSe0
Outcome
accumulation of Cu and Zne0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“PS promoted the highest biomass production in shoots and roots of the bean plants, reflecting in the highest accumulation of Cu and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 52 positive, 13 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

372 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.