Paper · 2016 · Ciência e Agrotecnologia

Co-inoculation with diazotrophic bacteria in soybeans associated to urea topdressing

Glauber Monçon Fipke; Gerusa Massuquini Conceição; Luiz Fernando Teleken Grando; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Increased grain yield can be obtained via an interaction between plants and growth-promoting microorganisms. The Bradyrhizobium spp. are capable of fixing atmospheric nitrogen in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merril], and Azospirillum spp. induce the synthesis of phytohormones. The aim of this study was to evaluate inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium + Azospirillum brasilense in soybeans in combination with the application a topdressing of 0, 75 or 150 kg of N ha-1 of urea during the reproductive stage. Three soybean cultivars (BMX Ativa, TEC 6029 and BMX Potência), were tested in field experiments in Santa Maria, RS, Brazil, during two agricultural years (2013/2014 and 2014/2015) and two sowing times. Morphological, nodulation and yield components were evaluated. Co-inoculation increased the grain yield by 240 kg ha-1 compared with conventional inoculation. When co-inoculated, cultivars BMX Ativa, TEC 6029 and BMX Potência showed increased grain yields of 6, 4 and 12%, respectively. The application of 150 kg ha-1 of N as a topdressing increased the grain yield by 300 kg ha-1 in the co-inoculated cultivars TEC 6029 and BMX Potência, but without a financial return. When inoculated only with Bradyrhizobium, the cultivars did not respond positively to the application of urea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum brasilense increased soybean grain yield by 240 kg ha-1 compared with conventional inoculation.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe2
Treatment
Co-inoculatione1
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee2symbiont
Second interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume2symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
240 kg ha-1e1
Comparator
conventional inoculatione1
Setting
field experiments in Santa Maria, RS, Brazile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Co-inoculation increased the grain yield by 240 kg ha-1 compared with conventional inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–910 · show in text ↑
e2

“evaluate inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium + Azospirillum brasilense in soybeans in combination with the application a topdressing of 0, 75 or 150 kg of N ha-1 of urea during the reproductive stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–548 · show in text ↑
e3

“Three soybean cultivars (BMX Ativa, TEC 6029 and BMX Potência), were tested in field experiments in Santa Maria, RS, Brazil, during two agricultural years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculated cultivar BMX Ativa had a grain yield increase of 6%.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe2
Material
BMX Ativae4
Treatment
co-inoculatede4
Outcome
grain yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
6e4
Qualifier
6, 4 and 12%, respectivelye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“evaluate inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium + Azospirillum brasilense in soybeans in combination with the application a topdressing of 0, 75 or 150 kg of N ha-1 of urea during the reproductive stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–548 · show in text ↑
e4

“When co-inoculated, cultivars BMX Ativa, TEC 6029 and BMX Potência showed increased grain yields of 6, 4 and 12%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculated cultivar TEC 6029 had a grain yield increase of 4%.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe2
Material
TEC 6029e4
Treatment
co-inoculatede4
Outcome
grain yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
4e4
Qualifier
6, 4 and 12%, respectivelye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“evaluate inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium + Azospirillum brasilense in soybeans in combination with the application a topdressing of 0, 75 or 150 kg of N ha-1 of urea during the reproductive stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–548 · show in text ↑
e4

“When co-inoculated, cultivars BMX Ativa, TEC 6029 and BMX Potência showed increased grain yields of 6, 4 and 12%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculated cultivar BMX Potência had a grain yield increase of 12%.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe2
Material
BMX Potênciae4
Treatment
co-inoculatede4
Outcome
grain yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
12%e4
Qualifier
6, 4 and 12%, respectivelye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“evaluate inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium + Azospirillum brasilense in soybeans in combination with the application a topdressing of 0, 75 or 150 kg of N ha-1 of urea during the reproductive stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–548 · show in text ↑
e4

“When co-inoculated, cultivars BMX Ativa, TEC 6029 and BMX Potência showed increased grain yields of 6, 4 and 12%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topdressing with 150 kg N ha-1 increased grain yield by 300 kg ha-1 in co-inoculated cultivars TEC 6029 and BMX Potência.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe2
Material
TEC 6029 and BMX Potênciae5
Treatment
150 kg ha-1 of N as a topdressinge5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
increasede5
Value
300 kg ha-1e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“evaluate inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium + Azospirillum brasilense in soybeans in combination with the application a topdressing of 0, 75 or 150 kg of N ha-1 of urea during the reproductive stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–548 · show in text ↑
e5

“The application of 150 kg ha-1 of N as a topdressing increased the grain yield by 300 kg ha-1 in the co-inoculated cultivars TEC 6029 and BMX Potência, but without a financial return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The topdressing with 150 kg N ha-1 gave no financial return.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe2
Treatment
150 kg ha-1 of N as a topdressinge5
Outcome
financial returne5
Qualifier
withoute5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“evaluate inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium + Azospirillum brasilense in soybeans in combination with the application a topdressing of 0, 75 or 150 kg of N ha-1 of urea during the reproductive stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–548 · show in text ↑
e5

“The application of 150 kg ha-1 of N as a topdressing increased the grain yield by 300 kg ha-1 in the co-inoculated cultivars TEC 6029 and BMX Potência, but without a financial return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When inoculated only with Bradyrhizobium, soybean cultivars did not respond positively to urea application.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe2
Treatment
application of ureae6
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume6symbiont
Outcome
respond positivelye6
Direction
did not respond positivelye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“evaluate inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium + Azospirillum brasilense in soybeans in combination with the application a topdressing of 0, 75 or 150 kg of N ha-1 of urea during the reproductive stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–548 · show in text ↑
e6

“When inoculated only with Bradyrhizobium, the cultivars did not respond positively to the application of urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1333 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · Bradyrhizobium · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · Azospirillum brasilense · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 491 positive, 75 negative or no effect

490 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,188 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.